What's new
US Message Board ūü¶Ö Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How unscientific are the Biden's administration "green energy" policies!

OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
24,012
Reaction score
6,510
Points
280
They are already at half the per capita usage of the USA, maybe you should take your own advice first.
Well being the communist as you are I understand how you ignore the communist state doesn't care about the world.
 

Dragonlady

Designing Woman
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
34,265
Reaction score
15,538
Points
1,600
Location
Niagara Escarpment
The hacked emails didn't reveal any fabrication in their methods.

Some people don't think a warmer wetter world will be the end of civilization.

Some people are making a lot of money off drilling, transportation, refining and selling fossil fuels and the machinery which relies on them. If everything changes, they'll be out of business. The American economy is built on a vast supply of cheap fossil fuels.

But the rest of the world doesn't have a cheap supply of fossil fuels, and global warming is occurring at a faster and faster rate as we continue to add carbon to the atmosphere. Now the rainforests which clean the carbon out of the air, are burning, adding to the carbon, and reducing the carbon being cleaned by the trees.

When are you fools going to smarter up and realize that you have stop burning carbon based fuels?
 

DukeU

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2020
Messages
3,852
Reaction score
3,993
Points
1,938

DukeU

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2020
Messages
3,852
Reaction score
3,993
Points
1,938
When are you fools going to smarter up and realize that you have stop burning carbon based fuels?

When are you fools going to realize it's a kill American jobs policy designed to export our jobs around the globe.

We shouldn't stop burning carbon based fuels until the rest of the world does, including CHINA.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
71,503
Reaction score
17,228
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Some people are making a lot of money off drilling, transportation, refining and selling fossil fuels and the machinery which relies on them.

Thank goodness. They create a vital product.

Without it, we'd be like a commie shithole.
 
OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
24,012
Reaction score
6,510
Points
280
Some people are making a lot of money off drilling, transportation, refining and selling fossil fuels and the machinery which relies on them. If everything changes, they'll be out of business. The American economy is built on a vast supply of cheap fossil fuels.

But the rest of the world doesn't have a cheap supply of fossil fuels, and global warming is occurring at a faster and faster rate as we continue to add carbon to the atmosphere. Now the rainforests which clean the carbon out of the air, are burning, adding to the carbon, and reducing the carbon being cleaned by the trees.

When are you fools going to smarter up and realize that you have stop burning carbon based fuels?
FACTS... YOU provide NOTHING! Now here are the FACTS!!!
1) There are approximately 3.04 trillion trees in the world. That’s a huge number that looks even more impressive when it’s written out: 3,040,000,000,000.
2) How much CO2 absorbed by trees...?
in one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange.
3) SO if an average tree absorbs just 35 pounds of CO2 per year... that would be :
3,040,000,000,000 trees X 35 pounds or 53,200,000,000 TONS...
4) How much CO2 emitted per year around the world?
In 2016 over 35,753,305,000 tons of CO2

HMMM.... Seems that 3.04 trillion trees even at 35 lbs per tree absorbs all plus 40% MORE!

So what is the problem???? FACTS not made up stories... FACTS!!!
In summary if the world emits 35.7 billion tons and trees at 35 lbs/tree absorbing CO2 means something is
incorrect. NOW YOU haven't provided any proof for your unsubstantiated statement:
"reducing the carbon being cleaned by the trees."
The above simple facts show how WRONG you are!
 
OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
24,012
Reaction score
6,510
Points
280
As part of the continual BIASED reporting, the MSM totally supports climate change and ignores the realities.
A) The MSM supports China even though it is nearly 3 times the CO2 emitter than the closest.
B) The MSM doesn't tell you there are with 3.04 trillion trees absorb 1.4 Times the amount of CO2 emitted.
There are dozens if not hundreds of further examples of how the BIASED MSM presents the uninformed information
that is derogatory of the USA, millions of Americans like me and millions of "LEGAL" immigrants. All those of us that
point this out want is some honest truthful presentations... but with the MSM politically donating to the Democrat/Communist/Progressives as the attached attest the truth is infrequently disclosed!
MSMdonations.png
 

Dragonlady

Designing Woman
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
34,265
Reaction score
15,538
Points
1,600
Location
Niagara Escarpment
FACTS... YOU provide NOTHING! Now here are the FACTS!!!
1) There are approximately 3.04 trillion trees in the world. That’s a huge number that looks even more impressive when it’s written out: 3,040,000,000,000.
2) How much CO2 absorbed by trees...?
in one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange.
3) SO if an average tree absorbs just 35 pounds of CO2 per year... that would be :
3,040,000,000,000 trees X 35 pounds or 53,200,000,000 TONS...
4) How much CO2 emitted per year around the world?
In 2016 over 35,753,305,000 tons of CO2

HMMM.... Seems that 3.04 trillion trees even at 35 lbs per tree absorbs all plus 40% MORE!

So what is the problem???? FACTS not made up stories... FACTS!!!
In summary if the world emits 35.7 billion tons and trees at 35 lbs/tree absorbing CO2 means something is
incorrect. NOW YOU haven't provided any proof for your unsubstantiated statement:
"reducing the carbon being cleaned by the trees."
The above simple facts show how WRONG you are!

Figures never lie, but liars often figure.

If ANYTHING you posted were true, then we really wouldn't be having a CO2 problem now would we? The CO2 readings captured in drills in the polar ice caps wouldn't be at their highest levels in history, and the world would be free of all of the CO2 in the world.

But in reality, all of our carbon dioxide reading are at their highest levels in history. Just the carbon being emitted by these massive wildfires is more than is being emitted by industry throughout the USA, at present. And Brazil is burning the Amazon rainforest at the rate of over 4000 acres in just the past 12 months, as agriculture trade with China increases.

The California utility, cited in the past for starting wildfires because of its aging and out of date equipment, has now started the two largest wildfires in California history. Billions of dollars, and entire towns lost because this company was too greedy to upgrade it's equipment. But hey, regulation hurts business. We can't force private companies to do what's right for the nation, can we? Their only responsibility is to make a profit for their shareholders, and new equipment reduces profits.

With both the Amazon rainforest ablaze for profit, and the temperate rainforest across North America ablaze because of profit, further increasing carbon dioxide and decreasing the number of trees available to combat it, climate change is acclerating and has now reached the point where it is costing the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars in insurance losses for fires and floods every year.

And still you deny the problem, and come up with your phony numbers to back up your lying about the cause of the problem.
 
Last edited:

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
71,503
Reaction score
17,228
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
The California utility, cited in the past for starting wildfires because of its aging and out of date equipment, has now started the two largest wildfires in California history. Billions of dollars, and entire towns lost because this company was too greedy to upgrade it's equipment.

Green mandates are expensive. They have to do that AND replace their old equipment?
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
71,503
Reaction score
17,228
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
And Brazil is burning the Amazon rainforest at the rate of over 4000 acres in just the past 12 months, as agriculture trade with China increases.

Can't trust those foreigners, eh?
 
OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
24,012
Reaction score
6,510
Points
280
Figures never lie, but liars often figure.

If ANYTHING you posted were true, then we really wouldn't be having a CO2 problem now would we? The CO2 readings captured in drills in the polar ice caps wouldn't be at their highest levels in history, and the world would be free of all of the CO2 in the world.

But in reality, all of our carbon dioxide reading are at their highest levels in history. Just the carbon being emitted by these massive wildfires is more than is being emitted by industry throughout the USA, at present. And Brazil is burning the Amazon rainforest at the rate of over 4000 acres in just the past 12 months, as agriculture trade with China increases.

The California utility, cited in the past for starting wildfires because of its aging and out of date equipment, has now started the two largest wildfires in California history. Billions of dollars, and entire towns lost because this company was too greedy to upgrade it's equipment. But hey, regulation hurts business. We can't force private companies to do what's right for the nation, can we? Their only responsibility is to make a profit for their shareholders, and new equipment reduces profits.

With both the Amazon rainforest ablaze for profit, and the temperate rainforest across North America ablaze because of profit, further increasing carbon dioxide and decreasing the number of trees available to combat it, climate change is acclerating and has now reached the point where it is costing the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars in insurance losses for fires and floods every year.

And still you deny the problem, and come up with your phony numbers to back up your lying about the cause of the problem.
Who in the hell are YOU? Where are your links? You made everything up!
I on the other hand provided you the links. Didn't you read the proof?
You telling me these people are lying? How Many Trees Are In The World? The Answer Will Surprise You

Or the department of Agriculture?

I'm not sure how you can live if you can't do simple math!
Multiple 3.04 trillion trees by the capture each tree does...remember I didn't use the 48 lbs/year but 35 lbs!
3.04 trillion trees by 48 lbs equals 145.9 trillion lbs or 72.96 Billion tons!
Do you refute that in 2016 over 35,753,305,000 tons of CO2 were emitted?
Do you refute this...
In one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange.

When you divide 72.9 billion tons by what has been emitted 35.7 billion that means 2.04 times the amount captured
than is emitted. So again don't fault me as I provide the links....whereas YOU? ZERO! Nothing! Prove the numbers are wrong!
 
OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
24,012
Reaction score
6,510
Points
280
Dragon fly wrote:
But in reality, all of our carbon dioxide reading are at their highest levels in history.
SO f...king WHAT???? If for every lb of CO2 being emitted 1 tree absorbs 2 lbs of CO2? What then is the problem?
SO what if READINGS are at the highest? So are the absorption rates!

You wrote: And Brazil is burning the Amazon rainforest at the rate of over 4000 acres in just the past 12 months,
where is your proof????? 4,000 acres is 333 trees or at 48 lbs....who wee.... a total of 16,000 lbs! no longer be captured! OH MY the sky is falling!!!

You wrote...The California utility, cited in the past for starting wildfires because of its aging and out of date equipment, has now started the two largest wildfires in California history. Billions of dollars, and entire towns lost because this company was too greedy to upgrade it's equipment.
NO it wasn't what you wrote above!!! Where's your proof? Here is the proof as to why the wildfires are so many!
FACTS LINKS!

Trump's Right About California's Fires: It Wasn't Climate Change; Two New California Laws Prove It​

The facts are clear: California’s deadliest year of wildfires has been decades in the making, with overlapping environmental rules, both state and federal, making fuel load reductions in forests and coastal chaparral nearly impossible, while hostility towards commercial timber harvesting has allowed a massive build up in tree density and brush with a concurrent reduction of access roads and firebreaks.
Yet in spite of blaming climate change and attacking President Trump for suggesting bad environmental policies made California’s fires worse, California’s outgoing governor, Jerry Brown, quietly signed two bills to correct the worst of the state’s fire management policy missteps, proving Trump was right all along.
As for forest management, it’s not as if the experts didn’t see the problem looming on the horizon. In a 2006 report, the Western Governors’ Association warned that, “…over time the fire-prone forests
that were not thinned, burn in uncharacteristically destructive wildfires‚Ķ ‚ĶIn the long term, leaving forests overgrown (makes them) prone to unnaturally destructive wildfires‚Ķ‚ÄĚ
 
OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
24,012
Reaction score
6,510
Points
280
So please those of you that write subjective, personal, unattributed, unlinked OPINIONS... read the facts.
Takes very little time to use that marvelous PROCESS called the INTERNET!!!!!
 

edthecynic

Censored for Cynicism
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
42,884
Reaction score
6,755
Points
1,830
Well being the communist as you are I understand how you ignore the communist state doesn't care about the world.
Being the NAZI as you are I understand how you blame the commies for everything.
 

edthecynic

Censored for Cynicism
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
42,884
Reaction score
6,755
Points
1,830
FACTS... YOU provide NOTHING! Now here are the FACTS!!!
1) There are approximately 3.04 trillion trees in the world. That’s a huge number that looks even more impressive when it’s written out: 3,040,000,000,000.
2) How much CO2 absorbed by trees...?
in one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange.
3) SO if an average tree absorbs just 35 pounds of CO2 per year... that would be :
3,040,000,000,000 trees X 35 pounds or 53,200,000,000 TONS...
4) How much CO2 emitted per year around the world?
In 2016 over 35,753,305,000 tons of CO2

HMMM.... Seems that 3.04 trillion trees even at 35 lbs per tree absorbs all plus 40% MORE!

So what is the problem???? FACTS not made up stories... FACTS!!!
In summary if the world emits 35.7 billion tons and trees at 35 lbs/tree absorbing CO2 means something is
incorrect. NOW YOU haven't provided any proof for your unsubstantiated statement:
"reducing the carbon being cleaned by the trees."
The above simple facts show how WRONG you are!
So typical of your half assed "logic."
While it is true that trees absorb CO2 in their vegetative season, that is only half the story. When their leaves die and decay they release that sequestered CO2, as you well know but dishonestly left out of your miscalculation.
Over the long-term a forest is neutral with respect to absorbing CO2. In summer when new leaves are active, it tended to absorb more CO2 than it produced, but in fall the reverse happened, but as a know-it-all you knew that already.
 

edthecynic

Censored for Cynicism
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
42,884
Reaction score
6,755
Points
1,830
Who in the hell are YOU? Where are your links? You made everything up!
I on the other hand provided you the links.
You dishonestly provided links to only half the story, just like a professional LIAR, tell just enough truth to deliberately mislead, and then shut up.

Beware of the half-truth. You may have gotten hold of the wrong half.
- Seymour Essrog

A half-truth is a whole lie.
- Yiddish Proverb
 

edthecynic

Censored for Cynicism
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
42,884
Reaction score
6,755
Points
1,830
SO f...king WHAT???? If for every lb of CO2 being emitted 1 tree absorbs 2 lbs of CO2? What then is the problem?
LIAR!
The problem is you LIE by telling half-truths.
 

edthecynic

Censored for Cynicism
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
42,884
Reaction score
6,755
Points
1,830
Do you refute this...
In one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange.
Yes, in half a year that is true, but in the other half of that same year a mature tree releases all that sequestered carbon through decay.
 
OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
24,012
Reaction score
6,510
Points
280
Yes, in half a year that is true, but in the other half of that same year a mature tree releases all that sequestered carbon through decay.
WHO the hell are YOU? Where are your facts? Why do you make dumb ass comments without any substantiation?
GEEZ it is so simple to prove it. USE the Internet!
 
OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
24,012
Reaction score
6,510
Points
280
LIAR!
The problem is you LIE by telling half-truths.
AGAIN I prove my statements!
I on the other hand provided you the links.
You telling me these people are lying?

How Many Trees Are In The World? The Answer Will Surprise You

Or the department of Agriculture?


I'm not sure how you can live if you can't do simple math!
Multiple 3.04 trillion trees by the capture each tree does...remember I didn't use the 48 lbs/year but 35 lbs!
3.04 trillion trees by 48 lbs equals 145.9 trillion lbs or 72.96 Billion tons!
Do you refute that in 2016 over 35,753,305,000 tons of CO2
When you divide 72.9 billion tons by what has been emitted 35.7 billion that means 2.04 times the amount captured
than is emitted.
So again don't fault me as I provide the links....whereas YOU? ZERO! Nothing! Prove the numbers are wrong!
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$145.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top