How Trump may be able to swing the deal for Greenland in my opinion, it is not far-fetched: Greenlandic prime minister ‘ready’ to talk with Trump

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
37,402
Reaction score
35,808
Points
2,905
This particular assertion from Trump gained global attention and I was considering it after initially thinking that perhaps Trump was changing the channel because of campaign promises he wouldn't deliver. Greenland would provide major benefits to America from a National Security standpoint and economic security.

Now, Denmark knows that Greenland has plenty of resources, however, they don't have the economy nor the means to extract and maximize the benefit of these resources. America does, and they will spend the money to extract and utilize.

Greenland is a critical point to protect from foreign invaders and would be the perfect location for America to reach a multitude of land masses around the globe to defend their NATO partners.

Greenland is also the shortest route to Europe over water. This would provide excellent cross water trade as well as a strategic location for America to build bases, ports and other useful assets in times of war. War which Europe realizes now is closer than they had ever believed just a few years ago.

What would it cost America to purchase it?

Well, I just throw out ideas but it's a start but consider how much money the U.S has spent on foolish endeavours and the price is quite reasonable.

The population of Greenland is only about 56,000 people or so, they should be allowed to vote in a transparent referendum on the citizenship question "would you like to become American"?. If the vote passed and there were people who didn't want to be American, than maybe the Danes would offer them citizenship and they could move, I don't know. Elections speak though.

If America offered $25,000 in U.S funds to every citizen, American dollars which all of these citizens would now receive as newly minted Americans; it would only cost the U.S $1.4B. You would decrease that significantly if say, you offered that amount to only adults. Allow say, $10,000 for minors to be held in trust. Trump could probably offer far less if the sentiment is as some say that many Greenlanders welcome being Americans so you could offer only $5,000 and they would be more willing to vote but I don't have scientist data to know and human behaviour is unique.

You then offer Denmark say $2-3B and more importantly, "special trade status" with America in which any domestic product of Denmark can be sold in the U.S with 0% tariff for 50 years. That would allow a generation of Denmark companies and entrepreneurs to realize their dreams through hard work and/or ingenuity and build closer relations with the Danes in the process. A win/win for NATO, Greenland, Denmark, Europe and America.

And in terms of Denmarks opinion of Greenland, see the quote below directly from Danish PM Frederiksen. If she believes this, than Greenland should be able to chart their own destiny:

------When it became clear that Trump was serious, Danish PM Frederiksen said: 'Greenland is not for sale. Greenland is not Danish. Greenland is Greenlandic.'-----


Greenlandic Prime Minister Múte Egede said he is “ready” to talk with President-elect Trump, who has recently expressed ambitions for the U.S. to acquire Greenland, the world’s largest island.


Egede was asked during a press conference in Copenhagen on Friday if he was in touch with the president-elect. He said no but added that “we are ready to talk.”
 
Denmark and Greenland said "No way".

To a non-fascist, that would have settled things. Fascists, however, see forcibly grabbing another country as justifiable for the "greater good".
Woah now, Trump didn't invade Greenland. Let's see how it unfolds. He had a lengthy, heated call with Denmarks leader and Greenlands leader is open to discusss, this is his job.

Greenlands citizens want to become American and Trump is offering it. So what's the problem? Aren't citizens free and sovereign to choose self determination?
 
Last edited:
Um, no they don't. That's kind of the point.

Where do you come up with this insane stuff?
You should try to read the research once in awhile and care about America and the Wests long-term plight.

poll finds majority of Greenland respondents support joining US​

https://thehill.com/policy/internat...-of-greenland-respondents-support-joining-us/

According to a poll by Patriot Polling released Sunday, 57.3 percent of respondents approve of Greenland becoming part of the U.S. Just 37.4 percent disapproved of the potential acquisition, and 5.3 percent are undecided about the move.

1737910804307.png
 
The population of Greenland is only about 56,000 people

You could offer each person a million US dollars and that would only be 56 billion $...far less than we've given to Ukraine!

But greenlaners would do much better if a fund was created to hold 5% of all minerals mined from greenland...which would be split among those 56,000...and it would be on-going for ever & ever (until mining in greenland ceased).
 
This particular assertion from Trump gained global attention and I was considering it after initially thinking that perhaps Trump was changing the channel because of campaign promises he wouldn't deliver. Greenland would provide major benefits to America from a National Security standpoint and economic security.

Now, Denmark knows that Greenland has plenty of resources, however, they don't have the economy nor the means to extract and maximize the benefit of these resources. America does, and they will spend the money to extract and utilize.

Greenland is a critical point to protect from foreign invaders and would be the perfect location for America to reach a multitude of land masses around the globe to defend their NATO partners.

Greenland is also the shortest route to Europe over water. This would provide excellent cross water trade as well as a strategic location for America to build bases, ports and other useful assets in times of war. War which Europe realizes now is closer than they had ever believed just a few years ago.

What would it cost America to purchase it?

Well, I just throw out ideas but it's a start but consider how much money the U.S has spent on foolish endeavours and the price is quite reasonable.

The population of Greenland is only about 56,000 people or so, they should be allowed to vote in a transparent referendum on the citizenship question "would you like to become American"?. If the vote passed and there were people who didn't want to be American, than maybe the Danes would offer them citizenship and they could move, I don't know. Elections speak though.

If America offered $25,000 in U.S funds to every citizen, American dollars which all of these citizens would now receive as newly minted Americans; it would only cost the U.S $1.4B. You would decrease that significantly if say, you offered that amount to only adults. Allow say, $10,000 for minors to be held in trust. Trump could probably offer far less if the sentiment is as some say that many Greenlanders welcome being Americans so you could offer only $5,000 and they would be more willing to vote but I don't have scientist data to know and human behaviour is unique.

You then offer Denmark say $2-3B and more importantly, "special trade status" with America in which any domestic product of Denmark can be sold in the U.S with 0% tariff for 50 years. That would allow a generation of Denmark companies and entrepreneurs to realize their dreams through hard work and/or ingenuity and build closer relations with the Danes in the process. A win/win for NATO, Greenland, Denmark, Europe and America.

And in terms of Denmarks opinion of Greenland, see the quote below directly from Danish PM Frederiksen. If she believes this, than Greenland should be able to chart their own destiny:

------When it became clear that Trump was serious, Danish PM Frederiksen said: 'Greenland is not for sale. Greenland is not Danish. Greenland is Greenlandic.'-----


Greenlandic Prime Minister Múte Egede said he is “ready” to talk with President-elect Trump, who has recently expressed ambitions for the U.S. to acquire Greenland, the world’s largest island.


Egede was asked during a press conference in Copenhagen on Friday if he was in touch with the president-elect. He said no but added that “we are ready to talk.”
This past week, I watched a Greenland program about ALCOA coming to Greenland. At the end of the program, ALCOA had cancelled the deal. Greenland waited on ALCOA for more than 7 years. Greenland gets freebies from Denmark. Greenland really needs freebies.

 
Denmark and Greenland said "No way".

To a non-fascist, that would have settled things. Fascists, however, see forcibly grabbing another country as justifiable for the "greater good".

Denmark doesn't have a say here.

Its really up to the Greenlandites on whether they will throw off the chains of European colonialists.

Hard to believe, but the libs suddenly think colonialism is a great idea.
 
Those big Brick and Mortar stores you see with Big Retail signs on them?

They're not owned by them. They lease them.

A Big Company will have a building built to order for them, 'sell' it to a holding company and lease it back. They're not in the Landlord Business, they're in the Retail Business. They don't want to be bothered with all the day to day bullshit of upkeep, maintenance, taxes, etc.

And just like Greenland, we don't want to govern them, or tax them or Police them, or build their roads or put up with their bullshit in the political arena.

We should lease what we need and let Denmark (or whoever) worry about all the other bullshit.
 
Denmark doesn't have a say here.

Its really up to the Greenlandites on whether they will throw off the chains of European colonialists.

Hard to believe, but the libs suddenly think colonialism is a great idea.
Alcoa has planted seeds that Greenland can't rely on America. The word got to Greenland that ALCOA was going to employ many Greenlanders. Then after years of waiting, ALCOA said no, it was not coming.
 
Those big Brick and Mortar stores you see with Big Retail signs on them?

They're not owned by them. They lease them.

A Big Company will have a building built to order for them, 'sell' it to a holding company and lease it back. They're not in the Landlord Business, they're in the Retail Business. They don't want to be bothered with all the day to day bullshit of upkeep, maintenance, taxes, etc.

And just like Greenland, we don't want to govern them, or tax them or Police them, or build their roads or put up with their bullshit in the political arena.

We should lease what we need and let Denmark (or whoever) worry about all the other bullshit.
Greenlanders have a bad drug use problem.
 
Denmark and Greenland said "No way".
It's not what people of Denmark and Greenland said. It's what they governments said. And if a government say something that the USA doesn't want to hear - it's not democratical, it's evil dictatorship. Truly democratic governments can say only "Sir, yessir!"

To a non-fascist, that would have settled things. Fascists, however, see forcibly grabbing another country as justifiable for the "greater good".
Thats what the USA did with 2/3 of Mexico. Where they "fascist" then?
 
Of course its good. "Better dead than red", isn't it?
You just solved Russia's problem. When can this be done to Russia?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom