Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
....
The young male students have no positive male role model in the home.
...
Oh, the irony...What are you afraid of? First, you beg for a question, then you duck and duck and duck and duck.
Funny, that's what I said.... those fixes don’t involve simply throwing more money at these schools.
....
That’s not what you said. You said more money alone won’t fix it. You don’t even know your own past statements.Funny, that's what I said.
70+ percent of them. You want more?All of them?
Where did you get that figure? Pull it right out of your ass?70+ percent of them. You want more?
That’s true. When you have 70+ percent of these kid living in a single parent home it’s tough to get the parent involved in a positive way.Parental involvement must comport with parental example.
That’s pretty much common knowledge you idiotWhere did you get that figure? Pull it right out of your ass?
The guy is one of the biggest I’ve seen here.Oh, the irony...
Oh, "pretty much common knowledge." That is some rock-solid evidence.....
That’s pretty much common knowledge you idiot
Is that "pretty much common knowledge" too?The guy is one of the biggest I’ve seen here.
It is hereIs that "pretty much common knowledge" too?
Considering the meager pay and public scorn its amazing even good teachers want to stay in it. People in general dont like even effective educators. Theres zero money in it. High stress. Starting pay requires working a second job to pay the bills. Wheres the motivation to go into it? I commend those that do.There is no broad-based "solution" for failing urban schools. While funding is a problem for many, the ones with good funding (NYC, Philadelphia, D.C., Chicago) don't really do any better because the real problem is not deteriorating facilities, "under-paid" teachers, or racism. The real problem is that the productive middle class largely left for the suburbs a few generations ago, leaving mainly poor people and rich people behind. Poor people are poor for a reason: they lack the intelligence, talents, life habits, and perseverance to be successful, so how would you expect their kids to do in school? Rich people send their kids to private or parochial schools, or see to it that their kids in the public schools access the programs that promote academic success.
The Republican "solution" is a combination of vouchers and charter schools, which give urban middle-class folks the ability to manage their kids' education without breaking the bank. The Democrat "solution" is to keep throwing more and more money at the schools, keeping their Union supporters happy, and always blaming the failures of urban schools on "not enough money." It's never "enough." If only The Rich and Corporations would pay "their fair share."
Why would a good teacher even apply for a teaching job in a failing urban school district? Money is not the answer if you fear for your safety.
We just need to create jobs that don't require an education (oh wait, that's most jobs now).Considering the meager pay and public scorn its amazing even good teachers want to stay in it. People in general dont like even effective educators. Theres zero money in it. High stress. Starting pay requires working a second job to pay the bills. Wheres the motivation to go into it? I commend those that do.
Yep. Keep in mind a large percentage of those jobs dont pay enough to support one person much less a family.We just need to create jobs that don't require an education (oh wait, that's most jobs now).
That's true of many entry level jobs regardless of one's education. Also, education doesn't make someone a good employee, character does.Yep. Keep in mind a large percentage of those jobs dont pay enough to support one person much less a family.
Being a good employee can work against one.That's true of many entry level jobs regardless of one's education. Also, education doesn't make someone a good employee, character does.