How to save inner city schools.

It sounds to me like you were one of the gangs that stuck people's heads in toilets. People like that found out in Junior High School to leave me alone because I was a berserker. Once I was forced to fight, I never stopped until the other guy stopped moving or I was pulled off. By the time I got to high school all six foot and 140 pounds of me never had a fight because people would take the bullies aside and say, "leave him alone, he will kill you". I would break up bully's attacks just by walking up and standing between them and their victim. I've always hated bullies.

Naah. Dipshit just makes excuses for jocks and bullies. I suspect he'd walk away if he saw the entire football team taking turns beating you with clubs.
 
Nonsense. God made Eric Harris his disorders were genetic and experiential. Thats how you get a psychopath
Pampered Preppy Predator
His mutant genes couldn't be recognized by his wealthy parents, because that would reflect on them. Denying what they had spawned, they denied him nothing. This, to him, was not a satire and his parents knew that:

 
Pampered Preppy Predator
His mutant genes couldn't be recognized by his wealthy parents, because that would reflect on them. Denying what they had spawned, they denied him nothing. This, to him, was not a satire and his parents knew that:



:cuckoo:
 
Soccer isn't an easy sport. It's a sport for the small and agile. I tried it a few times when I was in the army and very fit. The high school kids we were training with ran me to death. I survived a game of Rugby once, but soccer is a game at a much higher level of exertion.
"Let Them Eat Headers"

Peasants love to be worked to death. Like soccer peons, they are disarmed.
 
We played 5 matches in 3 days in a tournament once. That was brutal though. The only thing I recall after about half way through the third one was how increasingly painful every freaking step became just because of muscle fatigue.
Shot at and Missed, Shit at and Hit

Reminds me of patrolling ten hours a day under a blazing sun or drenching rain, on uneven ground with a heavy pack, in Vietnam.
 
Money isn't the issue, it's motivation and parental support. Most teachers (at east in L.A. Unified School District where I went) don't really give a damn about student success. A few do and they are worth their weight in gold, most are there to get a paycheck. The higher up the educational ladder you go, the worse it is, Administrators NEVER care about the kids, they are just attendance numbers for extra funding. There is an old, but very accurate saying, "those that can DO, those than can't do, TEACH, those that can't teach ADMINSTER". I always knew the first two, my wife who was a career Special Ed teacher taught me the third.
I don’t believe that MOST teachers in LA “don’t give a damn.”
 
Pampered Preppy Predator
His mutant genes couldn't be recognized by his wealthy parents, because that would reflect on them. Denying what they had spawned, they denied him nothing. This, to him, was not a satire and his parents knew that:



"Let Them Eat Headers"

Peasants love to be worked to death. Like soccer peons, they are disarmed.

Shot at and Missed, Shit at and Hit

Reminds me of patrolling ten hours a day under a blazing sun or drenching rain, on uneven ground with a heavy pack, in Vietnam.

Are you a bot?
 
Nice to know everything is so simple. :rolleyes:
NCJ Number

167327

Author(s)

R L Maginnis
Date Published

1997
Length

5 pages
Annotation
Children from single-parent families are more likely to have behavioral problems because they tend to lack economic security and adequate time with parents.
Abstract
The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. Fathers typically offer economic stability, a role model for boys, greater household security, and reduced stress for mothers. This is especially true for families with adolescent boys, the most crime-prone cohort. Children from single-parent families are more prone than children from two-parent families to use drugs, be gang members, be expelled from school, be committed to reform institutions, and become juvenile murderers. Single parenthood inevitably reduces the amount of time a child has in interaction with someone who is attentive to the child's needs, including the provision of moral guidance and discipline. According to a 1993 Metropolitan Life Survey, "Violence in America's Public Schools," 71 percent of teachers and 90 percent of law enforcement officials state that the lack of parental supervision at home is a major factor that contributes to the violence in schools. Sixty-one percent of elementary students and 76 percent of secondary children agree with this assessment.
 
Nice to know everything is so simple. :rolleyes:
There is no understating the destructiveness of single parenting. Are there exceptions? Of course! There are exceptions to everything. But there is no arguing that every single study, on every single way to measure - children growing up in a nucleus family do better than those who do not.
 
15th post
There is no understating the destructiveness of single parenting. Are there exceptions? Of course! There are exceptions to everything. But there is no arguing that every single study, on every single way to measure - children growing up in a nucleus family do better than those who do not.
1765552398291.webp
 
:rolleyes:
Spell check is what it is. And not surprised this is all you got
His point was correct. Single mothers are the main cause of poverty and crime as well as poor academic performance. A child needs two parents to develop to the best of his ability. Want an example. Blakcs have 73% single mothers 53 % of homicide and poor academic performance and mean IQ 85.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom