- Sep 16, 2012
- 66,696
- 62,386
- 3,605
Of course not.Not at all. My point is that we are not frozen from action because of the Founders.
I look forward to the status report on yoar petition to repeal the Fist Amendment.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course not.Not at all. My point is that we are not frozen from action because of the Founders.
Use spell checker. You are worse than me.Of course not.
I look forward to the status report on yoar petition to repeal the Fist Amendment.
![]()
I am sure that there are lots of folks on this site that appreciate your information.
Because only one side does this. . .
. . oh wait.
![]()
He's not going to report any churches telling their members to vote for Harris.Damn OP....There won't be any big city black churches left. Why do you hate black churches?![]()
Nope. Just a lot lot smarter than you.Use spell checker. You are worse than me.![]()
yoar
Unless said chuch is supporting dems, right?Churches are not allowed to be political and keep their 501C status.
Here's how to report them:
To: eoclass@irs.gov
Subject: Report of Illegal Church Electioneering
Body:
“To whom it may concern,
I am contacting you in regards to [Church name] for their partisan political actions despite claiming non profit status. They reside at [Full address]. Photo evidence of their electioneering is attached to this email in the form of a [Type of political advertisement] posted at/distributed from [Detailed location; i.e. SW corner of building]; photo taken [time and date].
Regards,
Full name, address, and contact information”
IRS complaint process - Tax-Exempt Organizations | Internal Revenue Service
An article describing the process for communicating alleged exempt organization tax law violations to the IRS and how the IRS handles such information.www.irs.gov
I found this information on reddit after a bit of digging around and used it a few days ago.
The church down the street has taken down their sign..
Would electionerring include inviting candidates to a church potluck and give a speech? It is traditional here in the south.
Seems that we are talking about real property...not religious beliefs.... and the responsibility an owner has to contribute to the governance infrastructure necessary for it to exist in our society.What part of the First Amendment don't you understand?
Because all the residents, all the members of the various congregations, in their communities, already pay their property tax.Seems that we are talking about real property...not religious beliefs.... and the responsibility an owner has to contribute to the governance infrastructure necessary for it to exist in our society.
So, why should religious property owners not meet the responsibility all other property owners perform? Rather than be a restriction on religion ...property tax responsibility allows religions to have the other freedoms the 1st suggests.
Why should the religious pay twice the property tax as the godless heathens?
Churches are not allowed to be political and keep their 501C status.
Here's how to report them:
To: eoclass@irs.gov
Subject: Report of Illegal Church Electioneering
Body:
“To whom it may concern,
I am contacting you in regards to [Church name] for their partisan political actions despite claiming non profit status. They reside at [Full address]. Photo evidence of their electioneering is attached to this email in the form of a [Type of political advertisement] posted at/distributed from [Detailed location; i.e. SW corner of building]; photo taken [time and date].
Regards,
Full name, address, and contact information”
IRS complaint process - Tax-Exempt Organizations | Internal Revenue Service
An article describing the process for communicating alleged exempt organization tax law violations to the IRS and how the IRS handles such information.www.irs.gov
I found this information on reddit after a bit of digging around and used it a few days ago.
The church down the street has taken down their sign..
Because as you well know. Prior to 1987, there was ZERO conservative media. At least none with substantial reach and influence. And AM radio stations didn't have talk programming for fear of the wrath from the FCC.How does fairness quash conservatives?
Leftists like Craptasticus and Bovineexcrement love their double standards.He's not going to report any churches telling their members to vote for Harris.
Harris blasting Trump in a black church yesterday was pathetic. That church should lose its tax-exemption.
Public Schools don't pay property tax. And folks that vehemently disagree with the STATE'S ideological agendas and choose to home school? Those folks still have to pay their property taxes for a services they ideologically oppose.----------------------------------------------
And so it is with employees of corporations.
The Corp pays property taxes.
So do the employees. Why the double dip?
The Religions that possess real estate are getting a free ride at taxpayer expense. If their church real estate benefits by good roads, police & fire protection, and other socialized improvements and safeguards.....then the church/mission/mosque etc. needs to pay its fair share. Our Constitution does not proscribe that the religion's dirt should benefit more than "heathen" dirt.
My point is: "Property Ownership"....in and of itself applies a burden upon the owner. Regardless if the owner prays, or profanes.
It is the real estate that is the defining principal. Not reverence or irreverence.
Nope. That's a violation of the first amendment.Harris blasting Trump in a black church yesterday was pathetic. That church should lose its tax-exemption.
Agreed. You make an excellent case for abolition corporate or personal property taxes.And so it is with employees of corporations.
The Corp pays property taxes.
So do the employees. Why the double dip?
----------------------------------------------
And so it is with employees of corporations.
The Corp pays property taxes.
So do the employees. Why the double dip?
The Religions that possess real estate are getting a free ride at taxpayer expense. If their church real estate benefits by good roads, police & fire protection, and other socialized improvements and safeguards.....then the church/mission/mosque etc. needs to pay its fair share. Our Constitution does not proscribe that the religion's dirt should benefit more than "heathen" dirt.
My point is: "Property Ownership"....in and of itself applies a burden upon the owner. Regardless if the owner prays, or profanes.
It is the real estate that is the defining principal. Not reverence or irreverence.