How to get Trump out

[basquebromance]

Trump's rollercoaster ride from Coney Island to colossus to collapse is a tragedy. but Trump made a comeback. and now as president, Trump will make another comeback!

 

[emilynghiem]

Dear Obama2020
America has its own issues and divisions that are destroying our country and killing our relations and budgets.
We can't blame the Russians for pointing out what was already there!

Guess what ! The Russians know what's going on in the US of A. and they're exploiting their cyberpower to the fullest to interfere with your state affairs and ideology.

And you will stand there doing nothing ?
Maybe you should start by plugging that hole before the damn breaks.... then you can start fixing your 'urgent' stuff.

Dear Obama2020
1. We can bypass any issues with depending on electronic systems for voting
by setting up more direct proportional by district by expanding the electoral system.
2. We should be more concerned that WE know what is going on within our
parties and corporate relations with govt. That's where the danger is of
disenfranchising and excluding our own citizens and taxpayers.
3. By empowering an informed citizenry with direct relations with govt
so we can manage our own programs, that's where we eliminate the
risk of manipulation.

We can change the system where there is no way or motivation
for disrupting it. By governing our resources and programs more
directly, then we have direct visibility and accountability.

That's how we are going to solve that problem
as well as all the others obfuscated by politics!

And yes it can be done by
A. repurposing our party structure and leadership to focus on
local democratic management per district and state so there is
direct accountability and visibility to check against abuses and corruption
B. applying "spiritual healing" to our political relationships so we
remove the whole problem of adversarial division over conflicts.
We can better accept, include, manage and respect our differences
by working TOGETHER not being divided in competition which is
how outside interests get away with exploitation.

You make fun of spiritual healing, but the basis of restoring good
faith relations is on forgiving and changing our whole approach
to be more effective and sustainable by solving problems. So it
has a greater impact than just individual healing, but heals
relations and whole groups, institutions, communities and nations.

 

[Obama2020]

You make fun of spiritual healing, but the basis of restoring good
faith relations is on forgiving and changing our whole approach
to be more effective and sustainable by solving problems. So it
has a greater impact than just individual healing, but heals
relations and whole groups, institutions, communities and nations.

Sorry girl... you're out of touch.
You let Russia lead you to a civil war... go for it.
Your house is on fire... who are you gonna call? The ghost busters LOLOL

 

[Obama2020]

Trump's rollercoaster ride from Coney Island to colossus to collapse is a tragedy. but Trump made a comeback. and now as president, Trump will make another comeback!

Yeah for sure ! as a Russian operative ? Absolutely !

 

[Obama2020]

It's sad to see such a bitter old hag like yourself, longing for Trump to grab your pussy.
You need to find a boyfriend.

You're not very original.... for a tree that is.
LMAO

 

[MAGAman]

2/3 of Democrats voted against impeachment because they're smart enough to know it will never get past the senate.
A bit like a wet fart. Elections have consequences and McConnell has the reigns letting nothing coming from the Dems go through.

In effect... caught in a twilight zone until subpoenas are finally enforced to get the information to the population of the USA.

Are you saying 2/3 voted against their conscience for political gain?

Amazing admission

 

[MAGAman]

Trump is an incompetent bozo.

Everyone is tired of his malfeasance, ineptitude and fear mongering.

This is why he has the lowest approval ratings of any president in US history.

He's gonna be flushed down the shitter of history in '20.

Bigly.

Sounds like the same tripe the America-Haters said 4 years ago.

 

[BluesLegend]

In 2020, you don't get him out whipping the wet noodle of socialism that's for sure.... especially with 1 trillion USD$ deficits incrementally stacking up every year rendering any socialist agenda unthinkable in the future.

Deficit Tracker | Bipartisan Policy Center

Regardless of any stupid behavior Trump might have, the effect of reckless tax breaks for the rich, deregulation and removing fail-safe measures set up by Obama-era administrators after the crash of 2008, should technically lead to another crash. This predictable outcome will truly lead to the eventual demise of Donald Trump and this at unfathomable cost to the world economy.

Anyone with a bit of cash knows that artificially fueling the economy to meet unrealistic political objectives (ie... GW Bush deregulation of real estate) is reckless and has already felt the painful bite.

Bush can share the blame for financial crisis

Time to get out of the stock market... I think the cards are set for another very painful episode. Final question will be: Where will the guy saved from bankruptcy by German and Russian banks go to ?

“It Will End Badly”: Beware the Time Bomb in the Trump Economy
When the economy turns—and it will; it always does—investors will lose hundreds of billions of dollars as a result of mispricing risk. “At this point, there’s more actual risk exposure than Trump would have you believe,” says one senior Wall Street banker, a friend of mine. “The world is more leveraged than it has ever been before at the corporate level, at the sovereign level, and collectively at the consumer level.”

I see you failed to mention, well pretty much all the Dem's who's fault most of this was.

 

[Pooh]

Dear Obama2020
Not wasting time and energy on this one when there is work
to be done, and people are not going to push for change in regime.
It's too critical to resolve issues with the people in office right now.

Quite correct... it's not 'the people' ... it will be Russian hackers pushing to keep the Trump regime in place.
And you can't keep people in office if there's eventually no money to pay them.

McConnell blocks election security bill so that Russians can keep on meddling in the elections. His conservative vision of america can only be obtained with the help of Russia, As long as Trump stays put McConnell can stack the courts with more fundamentalist christian conservative judges.

Halleluiah... good luck with your spiritual healing.

Nice fiction dude.

 

[elektra]

Why Mueller said he couldn’t indict Trump, explained

“The report presents very substantial evidence that the president is guilty of high crime and misdemeanors, and we have to let Mueller present those facts to the American people and then see where we go from there,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Mueller report shows evidence Trump committed crimes, House Judiciary chairman says - Reuters

Great, your link is before Mueller testified. Muller has now testified. Now tell us what evidence is in the Mueller report.

 

[The Original Tree]

It's sad to see such a bitter old hag like yourself, longing for Trump to grab your pussy.
You need to find a boyfriend.

You're not very original.... for a tree that is.
LMAO

Why didn’t Comey Exonerate Clinton?

 

[covfefe]

Trump is an incompetent bozo.

Everyone is tired of his malfeasance, ineptitude and fear mongering.

This is why he has the lowest approval ratings of any president in US history.

He's gonna be flushed down the shitter of history in '20.

Bigly.

Sounds like the same tripe the America-Haters said 4 years ago.

Herr durr?

 

[basquebromance]

we need a GRASSROOTS EFFORT!

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Mueller, no crimes found. That makes trump squeaky clean.

Fake news again. Here's the real deal:

According to the agency’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), a sitting president cannot be charged with a federal crime.
Crimes were found and Trump could face criminal prosecution (obstruction ) once he leaves office says Mueller.


Why Mueller said he couldn’t indict Trump, explained

“The report presents very substantial evidence that the president is guilty of high crime and misdemeanors, and we have to let Mueller present those facts to the American people and then see where we go from there,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Mueller report shows evidence Trump committed crimes, House Judiciary chairman says - Reuters

LOL, you characterize someone's post as "fake news" and then proceed to support your statement by literally citing fake news that was wholly belied by Mueller's testimony before the House Intelligence Committee.

You really should watch the Mueller hearing from two days ago and listen to all of his testimony, rather than just the clips selected by your go-to TV/internet news source (applies to all of them). I realize that would require you to listen for nearly 6 hours without the help of a media talking head to tell you what's important and what to think. But it's a worthy endeavor, as it would help you avoid future posts like this.

I'll help you out in the meantime by directing you to Mueller's testimony that specifically and unambiguously contradicts the fake news link you posted that purports to explain "why Mueller said he couldn't indict Trump."

John Radcliffe: "So to that point you addressed one of the issues that I needed to, which is from your testimony this morning, which some construed as a change to the written report. You talked about the exchange you had with Congressman Lieu, I wrote it down a little bit different, I want to ask you about it so the record's perfectly clear. I recorded that he asked you, 'the reason you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating you cannot indict a sitting president' to which you responded 'that is correct.' That response is inconsistent, I think you'll agree, with your written report. I want to be clear that it is not your intent to change your written report, it is your intent to clarify the record today?"

Mueller: "As I started today, this afternoon, and added either a footnote or an end note, what I wanted to clarify is the fact that we did not make any determination with regard to culpability, in any way"

So here we have the testimony of Mueller himself, in his own words, under oath, explaining that the much-discussed OLC memo was not the reason he didn't indict Trump; and explaining that Trump was not indicted because Mueller did not make any determination whatsoever with regard to whether a crime was committed by Trump.

Contrast that testimony against the statements you attributed to Mueller about Trump's culpability for obstruction and why he didn't indict Trump:

According to the agency’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), a sitting president cannot be charged with a federal crime.Crimes were found and Trump could face criminal prosecution (obstruction) once he leaves office says Mueller.

I mean, come on man. Whether you came up with that yourself or you're just parroting something you read/heard elsewhere, by posting stuff like that which attributes statements and motivations to Mueller that are in direct contrast to his actual testimony this week, you come off as being either terribly misinformed, or someone who is so committed to the collusion/obstruction narrative that you've decided to ignore Mueller's testimony and invent your own universe of things Mueller said.

For reference, here's the full video of the afternoon session with the House Intelligence Committee. If you want to skip right to the part where Mueller gave the testimony quoted above, it's at about 28:35:

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), questioning former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III hours into Mueller’s House Judiciary Committee testimony, posed a fairly straightforward question.

“The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump,” Lieu asked, “is because of OLC opinion that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”

The “OLC” in that question refers to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel. In 2000, the OLC issued a ruling that a sitting president couldn’t be indicted on criminal charges. Was that ruling, Lieu was asking, the reason that Trump didn’t face criminal charges?

“That is correct,” Mueller responded.

This, standing by itself, is an explosive exchange. The implication is that but for the OLC Trump would face indictment, presumably on charges of obstruction of justice.

This is yet another prime example of why you should watch the source material yourself, rather than looking to media sources to tell you what happened and what you should think about it. Here you are, acting like you've dropped a knowledge bomb by citing an article that was written during the morning session of the Mueller hearing, before Mueller came back for the afternoon session and specifically clarified that testimony TWO separate times.

First, in his opening statement to the House Intelligence Committee, Mueller retracted his testimony as to that specific exchange with Congressman Lieu, and provided a corrected answer (see afternoon session video @ 11:48):

Mueller: "Now before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu who said, and I quote, 'you didn't charge the president because of the OLC opinion.' That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report, and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination about whether the president committed a crime. And with that, Mr. Chairman, I'm ready to answer questions.

Second, as referenced in my last post, he further explained his retraction of that testimony and his clarified answer answer to Congressman Radcliffe (see afternoon session video @ 28:35)

Radcliffe: "So to that point you addressed one of the issues that I needed to, which is from your testimony this morning, which some construed as a change to the written report. You talked about the exchange you had with Congressman Lieu, I wrote it down a little bit different, I want to ask you about it so the record's perfectly clear. I recorded that he asked you, 'the reason you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating you cannot indict a sitting president' to which you responded 'that is correct.' That response is inconsistent, I think you'll agree, with your written report. I want to be clear that it is not your intent to change your written report, it is your intent to clarify the record today?"

Mueller: "As I started today, this afternoon, and added either a footnote or an end note, what I wanted to clarify is the fact that we did not make any determination with regard to culpability, in any way"

So to break this down for you, if Muller never determined that Trump committed an indictable crime, then obviously the OLC opinion is not the reason he wasn't indicted. In other words, this testimony--which you obviously did not watch--belies your conclusion that but for the OLC Trump would face indictment.

 

[elektra]

I mean, come on man. Whether you came up with that yourself or you're just parroting something you read/heard elsewhere, by posting stuff like that which attributes statements and motivations to Mueller that are in direct contrast to his actual testimony this week, you come off as being either terribly misinformed, or someone who is so committed to the collusion/obstruction narrative that you've decided to ignore Mueller's testimony and invent your own universe of things Mueller said.

For reference, here's the full video of the afternoon session with the House Intelligence Committee. If you want to skip right to the part where Mueller gave the testimony quoted above, it's at about 28:35:

Great, I challenge you to post, the evidence in the Mueller report, and you can not do that. You post anything but the evidence. What is the evidence. You made the claim it is there. You have testimony from Mueller. Simply quote and link! You can not do that. All you can do is attempt to denigrate me. Support your claim.
Show us the evidence.

 

[covfefe]

Regardless of the Mueller Report Trump has the lowest approval ratings of any president in modern history. Clearly some in his base of screaming racist idiots love him but they are the vast minority. Moderate Republicans don't support him. Independents don't support him. Democrats don't support him.

His base is not enough.

He will lose.

Bigly.

Tick tock.