How They Lie, And How They Are Exposed....

[depotoo]

He was asked in context to the campaign- nothing else. That had nothing to do with the campaign.

Now, care to comment on the topic here?

Appears I've hit a nerve among the fifth columnists.....

Further posts may be even more painful.


Excellent.

You consider the Keebler Attorney General caught lying again to be excellent? Carter page just threw him under the bus too.

 

[BULLDOG]

He was asked in context to the campaign- nothing else. That had nothing to do with the campaign.

Now, care to comment on the topic here?

Appears I've hit a nerve among the fifth columnists.....

Further posts may be even more painful.


Excellent.

You consider the Keebler Attorney General caught lying again to be excellent? Carter page just threw him under the bus too.

Yep, Sessions is trying to use that excuse too. Don't think Mueller is going to fall for that. Only a hard core RWNJ would believe that.

 

[depotoo]

“Still, it’s somewhat disingenuous to say this uranium is now Russia’s, to do with what it pleases, or to suggest that any amount of the uranium will end up in Iran. The current licenses – held by the US-based subsidiaries and approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission – do not allow exports from any U1H US facility. “

Does Russia Really Own 20% Of The US’ Uranium Reserves? | OilPrice.com

This was repeated over and over.
Yet in 2012 they were allowed to ship it out under another company’s license-


“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release that announced that ARMZ, a subsidiary of the Russian state-owned Rosatom, had been approved to take ownership of the Uranium One mining firm and its American assets.

A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance in a letter to Sen. John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican in whose state Uranium One operated mines.

Uranium One Inc. nor AMRZ holds a specific NRC export license. In order to export uranium from the United States, Uranium One Inc. or ARMZ would need to apply for and obtain a specific NRC license authorizing the exports of uranium for use in reactor fuel,” then-NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko wrote to Barrasso.

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported on Monday, linking to the 2011 Barrasso letter.

Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe, government documents show.

NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount of uranium that Uranium One exported because the information is proprietary. They did, however, say that the shipments only lasted from 2012 to 2014 and that they are unaware of any exports since then.

NRC officials told The Hill that Uranium One exports flowed from Wyoming to Canada and on to Europe between 2012 and 2014, and the approval involved a process with multiple agencies.

Rather than give Rosatom a direct export license — which would have raised red flags inside a Congress already suspicious of the deal — the NRC in 2012 authorized an amendment to an existing export license for a Paducah, Ky.-based trucking firm called RSB Logistics Services Inc. to simply add Uranium One to the list of clients whose uranium it could move to Canada.

The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment. “
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



This was repeated over and over, but it was a lie, as they did get to ship it under another company’s license.

Honey, are you naive? It can be processed into weapons grade.
But now, let’s see you quit ignoring the fact they lied about it’s export, why don’t we?

No, you choose to ignore the fact the Dems lied about it. Period. End of story.

(Wow, a new budget for paid progressive posters must have been developed in light of all the recent revelations, to try to help tamp down their further destruction)

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment.

Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, stressing all the exports complied with federal law.

“None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said. “Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation.”

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

It's not weapons-grade. You make electricity from it not bombs. Stop wetting your panties over it.

What's the lie?

 

[Guysguy]

“Still, it’s somewhat disingenuous to say this uranium is now Russia’s, to do with what it pleases, or to suggest that any amount of the uranium will end up in Iran. The current licenses – held by the US-based subsidiaries and approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission – do not allow exports from any U1H US facility. “

Does Russia Really Own 20% Of The US’ Uranium Reserves? | OilPrice.com

This was repeated over and over.
Yet in 2012 they were allowed to ship it out under another company’s license-


“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release that announced that ARMZ, a subsidiary of the Russian state-owned Rosatom, had been approved to take ownership of the Uranium One mining firm and its American assets.

A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance in a letter to Sen. John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican in whose state Uranium One operated mines.

Uranium One Inc. nor AMRZ holds a specific NRC export license. In order to export uranium from the United States, Uranium One Inc. or ARMZ would need to apply for and obtain a specific NRC license authorizing the exports of uranium for use in reactor fuel,” then-NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko wrote to Barrasso.

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported on Monday, linking to the 2011 Barrasso letter.

Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe, government documents show.

NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount of uranium that Uranium One exported because the information is proprietary. They did, however, say that the shipments only lasted from 2012 to 2014 and that they are unaware of any exports since then.

NRC officials told The Hill that Uranium One exports flowed from Wyoming to Canada and on to Europe between 2012 and 2014, and the approval involved a process with multiple agencies.

Rather than give Rosatom a direct export license — which would have raised red flags inside a Congress already suspicious of the deal — the NRC in 2012 authorized an amendment to an existing export license for a Paducah, Ky.-based trucking firm called RSB Logistics Services Inc. to simply add Uranium One to the list of clients whose uranium it could move to Canada.

The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment. “
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



This was repeated over and over, but it was a lie, as they did get to ship it under another company’s license.

Honey, are you naive? It can be processed into weapons grade.
But now, let’s see you quit ignoring the fact they lied about it’s export, why don’t we?

No, you choose to ignore the fact the Dems lied about it. Period. End of story.

(Wow, a new budget for paid progressive posters must have been developed in light of all the recent revelations, to try to help tamp down their further destruction)

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment.

Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, stressing all the exports complied with federal law.

“None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said. “Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation.”

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

It's not weapons-grade. You make electricity from it not bombs. Stop wetting your panties over it.

What's the lie?

You seem to be worried about exported uranium and I am not. I can't help you as I'm not paranoid.

 

[depotoo]

Honey, it has to do with the lies. The fact you find that acceptable by your party over and over and over just tells me who you are. No paranoia here, dear.

“Still, it’s somewhat disingenuous to say this uranium is now Russia’s, to do with what it pleases, or to suggest that any amount of the uranium will end up in Iran. The current licenses – held by the US-based subsidiaries and approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission – do not allow exports from any U1H US facility. “

Does Russia Really Own 20% Of The US’ Uranium Reserves? | OilPrice.com

This was repeated over and over.
Yet in 2012 they were allowed to ship it out under another company’s license-


“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release that announced that ARMZ, a subsidiary of the Russian state-owned Rosatom, had been approved to take ownership of the Uranium One mining firm and its American assets.

A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance in a letter to Sen. John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican in whose state Uranium One operated mines.

Uranium One Inc. nor AMRZ holds a specific NRC export license. In order to export uranium from the United States, Uranium One Inc. or ARMZ would need to apply for and obtain a specific NRC license authorizing the exports of uranium for use in reactor fuel,” then-NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko wrote to Barrasso.

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported on Monday, linking to the 2011 Barrasso letter.

Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe, government documents show.

NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount of uranium that Uranium One exported because the information is proprietary. They did, however, say that the shipments only lasted from 2012 to 2014 and that they are unaware of any exports since then.

NRC officials told The Hill that Uranium One exports flowed from Wyoming to Canada and on to Europe between 2012 and 2014, and the approval involved a process with multiple agencies.

Rather than give Rosatom a direct export license — which would have raised red flags inside a Congress already suspicious of the deal — the NRC in 2012 authorized an amendment to an existing export license for a Paducah, Ky.-based trucking firm called RSB Logistics Services Inc. to simply add Uranium One to the list of clients whose uranium it could move to Canada.

The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment. “
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



This was repeated over and over, but it was a lie, as they did get to ship it under another company’s license.

Honey, are you naive? It can be processed into weapons grade.
But now, let’s see you quit ignoring the fact they lied about it’s export, why don’t we?

No, you choose to ignore the fact the Dems lied about it. Period. End of story.

(Wow, a new budget for paid progressive posters must have been developed in light of all the recent revelations, to try to help tamp down their further destruction)

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment.

Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, stressing all the exports complied with federal law.

“None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said. “Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation.”

It's not weapons-grade. You make electricity from it not bombs. Stop wetting your panties over it.

What's the lie?

You seem to be worried about exported uranium and I am not. I can't help you as I'm not paranoid.

 

[PoliticalChic]

lol.... there is a reason why wiki is not accepted as a reliable, unbiased, factual, verifiable source in the academic world. it can be manipulated at anytime from anybody.

remember this? i do:

The Wikipedia War of Paul Revere and Sarah Palin

Adam Clark Estes,
The Atlantic Wire•June 6, 2011

Sarah Palin will not relent in defending her revisionist history of Paul Revere's ride from Boston to Lexington, in which Revere "warned the British." And her supporters similarly will not relent in revising the history of the event on Wikipedia in order to reflect Palin's version. Wikipedia editors are fed up with the flood of poorly sourced changes to the Paul Revere page--many point to Palin herself as a history expert--and have called for a lock on the page and an end to the discussion.
[...]
The Wikipedia War of Paul Revere and Sarah Palin

or you can pick any other website to read about it.

wikipedia sarah palin paul revere - Google Search


shirley you should have known about wikipedia's unreliabilty political chicky....

Can you really be this stupid????

But....I never mind putting you in your place.

I quoted The Hill......

"The Hill is an American political journalism newspaper and website published in Washington, D.C. since 1994.[3][4][5] It is published by Capitol Hill Publishing, which is owned by News Communications, Inc. Focusing on politics, policy, business and international relations, The Hillcoverage includes the U.S. Congress, the presidency, and election campaigns.[6]

The newspaper has the largest circulation of any Capitol Hill publication, with more than 24,000 print readers.[4] It also operates a news website which features six blogs dedicated to specific political and policy issues: Ballot Box, Blog Briefing Room, Congress Blog, Floor Action, In the Know, and Twitter Room."
The Hill (newspaper) - Wikipedia


" The Hill covers both sides on the political spectrum and generally sources information, however they sometimes rush stories and have to change them after the fact. Has a left-center reporting bias. (5/18/2016) Updated (4/26/2017)"
The Hill - Media Bias/Fact Check

Most news, and most schools, are center-left. Those are left-learning occupations. It's why Fox News was started as center-right and then went right over the cliff when the black guy was elected and then reelected.

Did you know that the Left is responsible for the slaughter of over 100 million men, women and children?

Did they teach you that in government school?

 

[Guysguy]

lol.... there is a reason why wiki is not accepted as a reliable, unbiased, factual, verifiable source in the academic world. it can be manipulated at anytime from anybody.

remember this? i do:

The Wikipedia War of Paul Revere and Sarah Palin

Adam Clark Estes,
The Atlantic Wire•June 6, 2011

Sarah Palin will not relent in defending her revisionist history of Paul Revere's ride from Boston to Lexington, in which Revere "warned the British." And her supporters similarly will not relent in revising the history of the event on Wikipedia in order to reflect Palin's version. Wikipedia editors are fed up with the flood of poorly sourced changes to the Paul Revere page--many point to Palin herself as a history expert--and have called for a lock on the page and an end to the discussion.
[...]
The Wikipedia War of Paul Revere and Sarah Palin

or you can pick any other website to read about it.

wikipedia sarah palin paul revere - Google Search


shirley you should have known about wikipedia's unreliabilty political chicky....

Can you really be this stupid????

But....I never mind putting you in your place.

I quoted The Hill......

"The Hill is an American political journalism newspaper and website published in Washington, D.C. since 1994.[3][4][5] It is published by Capitol Hill Publishing, which is owned by News Communications, Inc. Focusing on politics, policy, business and international relations, The Hillcoverage includes the U.S. Congress, the presidency, and election campaigns.[6]

The newspaper has the largest circulation of any Capitol Hill publication, with more than 24,000 print readers.[4] It also operates a news website which features six blogs dedicated to specific political and policy issues: Ballot Box, Blog Briefing Room, Congress Blog, Floor Action, In the Know, and Twitter Room."
The Hill (newspaper) - Wikipedia


" The Hill covers both sides on the political spectrum and generally sources information, however they sometimes rush stories and have to change them after the fact. Has a left-center reporting bias. (5/18/2016) Updated (4/26/2017)"
The Hill - Media Bias/Fact Check

Most news, and most schools, are center-left. Those are left-learning occupations. It's why Fox News was started as center-right and then went right over the cliff when the black guy was elected and then reelected.

Did you know that the Left is responsible for the slaughter of over 100 million men, women and children?

Did they teach you that in government school?

100 million? Okay, fine. Now how many by the people forbidden by their religion to kill or wage war? Another 100 million? Mankind has no problem slaughtering the other, faith or no faith. At least the Godless are honest about it. They don't say that they believe one thing and then do another.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

Another fifth columnist posting the usual "is not, issssss nootttttttt!!!' post.

I'm lovin' it.

Stop lovin' it and use your head for a change. Selling uranium doesn't sell out America. It doesn't stop or start the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the deal to sell that part of the company had "extreme vetting". It wasn't a bag of cash handed to Hillary at a coffee shop. She didn't even know of it nor would it matter if she did. You are posting a giant nothing burger for the lack anything better to do I guess.

Now that the outrageous bribery scandal has been revealed.....

...which Democrats are still endorsing it, you dunce????


"But it’s not just Republicans who have said that the revelation the FBI had evidence that Rosatom was engaged in criminality during the time it was receiving favorable decisions from the U.S. government deserves fresh scrutiny.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a member of both the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees, told The Hill she would like to learn more about what the FBI knew.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) has criticized Republicans for investigating Clinton, but said on “Morning Joe” last month he has "no problem looking into" the Uranium One deal.

And Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) said Sunday on CNN that he believed it was appropriate for Congress to investigate the new information.

“One of the House committees has already begun an oversight committee hearing," King said. "I always think oversight hearings are appropriate. I’ve been trying to understand this deal."

King also repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium.

A legal expert on the CFIUS process told The Hill that the new revelation that the FBI knew that a Rosatom official was engaged in illegality on U.S. soil before the sale was approved could very well have affected the decision if that evidence had been made public in real time."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show





That's the problem with you Leftist acolytes....you're simply too stupid to keep up with changes in direction.....

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Dem politicians are greedy lying demagogues and Dem voters are their shit fed sheep

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, you choose to ignore the fact the Dems lied about it. Period. End of story.

(Wow, a new budget for paid progressive posters must have been developed in light of all the recent revelations, to try to help tamp down their further destruction)

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment.

Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, stressing all the exports complied with federal law.

“None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said. “Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation.”

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

It's not weapons-grade. You make electricity from it not bombs. Stop wetting your panties over it.

Why would all of Europe's energy provider need uranium to make electricity?


What a moron.


In 1996 the NYTimes published this about Hillary Clinton..."a congenital liar"....
...and you still haven't caught on.

 

[Guysguy]

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

Another fifth columnist posting the usual "is not, issssss nootttttttt!!!' post.

I'm lovin' it.

Stop lovin' it and use your head for a change. Selling uranium doesn't sell out America. It doesn't stop or start the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the deal to sell that part of the company had "extreme vetting". It wasn't a bag of cash handed to Hillary at a coffee shop. She didn't even know of it nor would it matter if she did. You are posting a giant nothing burger for the lack anything better to do I guess.

Now that the outrageous bribery scandal has been revealed.....

...which Democrats are still endorsing it, you dunce????


"But it’s not just Republicans who have said that the revelation the FBI had evidence that Rosatom was engaged in criminality during the time it was receiving favorable decisions from the U.S. government deserves fresh scrutiny.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a member of both the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees, told The Hill she would like to learn more about what the FBI knew.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) has criticized Republicans for investigating Clinton, but said on “Morning Joe” last month he has "no problem looking into" the Uranium One deal.

And Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) said Sunday on CNN that he believed it was appropriate for Congress to investigate the new information.

“One of the House committees has already begun an oversight committee hearing," King said. "I always think oversight hearings are appropriate. I’ve been trying to understand this deal."

King also repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium.

A legal expert on the CFIUS process told The Hill that the new revelation that the FBI knew that a Rosatom official was engaged in illegality on U.S. soil before the sale was approved could very well have affected the decision if that evidence had been made public in real time."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show





That's the problem with you Leftist acolytes....you're simply too stupid to keep up with changes in direction.....

You can "look" into anything you like. Whether the crap stayed here or was exported makes no difference. It's capitalism at work. If you don't like it then move to North Korea.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Honey, are you naive? It can be processed into weapons grade.
But now, let’s see you quit ignoring the fact they lied about it’s export, why don’t we?

No, you choose to ignore the fact the Dems lied about it. Period. End of story.

(Wow, a new budget for paid progressive posters must have been developed in light of all the recent revelations, to try to help tamp down their further destruction)

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment.

Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, stressing all the exports complied with federal law.

“None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said. “Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation.”

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

It's not weapons-grade. You make electricity from it not bombs. Stop wetting your panties over it.

What's the lie?

"What's the lie?"

Short term memory loss???


OK.....once again:

2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

 

[Guysguy]

No, you choose to ignore the fact the Dems lied about it. Period. End of story.

(Wow, a new budget for paid progressive posters must have been developed in light of all the recent revelations, to try to help tamp down their further destruction)

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment.

Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, stressing all the exports complied with federal law.

“None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said. “Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation.”

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

It's not weapons-grade. You make electricity from it not bombs. Stop wetting your panties over it.

Why would all of Europe's energy provider need uranium to make electricity?


What a moron.


In 1996 the NYTimes published this about Hillary Clinton..."a congenital liar"....
...and you still haven't caught on.

In capitalism you buy from who is selling at the right price. Remarkable, I know.

 

[Guysguy]

Honey, are you naive? It can be processed into weapons grade.
But now, let’s see you quit ignoring the fact they lied about it’s export, why don’t we?

No, you choose to ignore the fact the Dems lied about it. Period. End of story.

(Wow, a new budget for paid progressive posters must have been developed in light of all the recent revelations, to try to help tamp down their further destruction)

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment.

Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, stressing all the exports complied with federal law.

“None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said. “Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation.”

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

It's not weapons-grade. You make electricity from it not bombs. Stop wetting your panties over it.

What's the lie?

"What's the lie?"

Short term memory loss???


OK.....once again:

2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

Exporting things, including uranium, is a good thing you little moron. We do that here, we are capitalists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

lol.... there is a reason why wiki is not accepted as a reliable, unbiased, factual, verifiable source in the academic world. it can be manipulated at anytime from anybody.

remember this? i do:

The Wikipedia War of Paul Revere and Sarah Palin

Adam Clark Estes,
The Atlantic Wire•June 6, 2011

Sarah Palin will not relent in defending her revisionist history of Paul Revere's ride from Boston to Lexington, in which Revere "warned the British." And her supporters similarly will not relent in revising the history of the event on Wikipedia in order to reflect Palin's version. Wikipedia editors are fed up with the flood of poorly sourced changes to the Paul Revere page--many point to Palin herself as a history expert--and have called for a lock on the page and an end to the discussion.
[...]
The Wikipedia War of Paul Revere and Sarah Palin

or you can pick any other website to read about it.

wikipedia sarah palin paul revere - Google Search


shirley you should have known about wikipedia's unreliabilty political chicky....

Can you really be this stupid????

But....I never mind putting you in your place.

I quoted The Hill......

"The Hill is an American political journalism newspaper and website published in Washington, D.C. since 1994.[3][4][5] It is published by Capitol Hill Publishing, which is owned by News Communications, Inc. Focusing on politics, policy, business and international relations, The Hillcoverage includes the U.S. Congress, the presidency, and election campaigns.[6]

The newspaper has the largest circulation of any Capitol Hill publication, with more than 24,000 print readers.[4] It also operates a news website which features six blogs dedicated to specific political and policy issues: Ballot Box, Blog Briefing Room, Congress Blog, Floor Action, In the Know, and Twitter Room."
The Hill (newspaper) - Wikipedia


" The Hill covers both sides on the political spectrum and generally sources information, however they sometimes rush stories and have to change them after the fact. Has a left-center reporting bias. (5/18/2016) Updated (4/26/2017)"
The Hill - Media Bias/Fact Check

Most news, and most schools, are center-left. Those are left-learning occupations. It's why Fox News was started as center-right and then went right over the cliff when the black guy was elected and then reelected.

Did you know that the Left is responsible for the slaughter of over 100 million men, women and children?

Did they teach you that in government school?

100 million? Okay, fine. Now how many by the people forbidden by their religion to kill or wage war? Another 100 million? Mankind has no problem slaughtering the other, faith or no faith. At least the Godless are honest about it. They don't say that they believe one thing and then do another.

" Now how many by the people forbidden by their religion to kill or wage war?"

None.

Not in the faiths that founded this nation, the Judeo-Christian faiths.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

Another fifth columnist posting the usual "is not, issssss nootttttttt!!!' post.

I'm lovin' it.

Stop lovin' it and use your head for a change. Selling uranium doesn't sell out America. It doesn't stop or start the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the deal to sell that part of the company had "extreme vetting". It wasn't a bag of cash handed to Hillary at a coffee shop. She didn't even know of it nor would it matter if she did. You are posting a giant nothing burger for the lack anything better to do I guess.

Now that the outrageous bribery scandal has been revealed.....

...which Democrats are still endorsing it, you dunce????


"But it’s not just Republicans who have said that the revelation the FBI had evidence that Rosatom was engaged in criminality during the time it was receiving favorable decisions from the U.S. government deserves fresh scrutiny.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a member of both the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees, told The Hill she would like to learn more about what the FBI knew.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) has criticized Republicans for investigating Clinton, but said on “Morning Joe” last month he has "no problem looking into" the Uranium One deal.

And Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) said Sunday on CNN that he believed it was appropriate for Congress to investigate the new information.

“One of the House committees has already begun an oversight committee hearing," King said. "I always think oversight hearings are appropriate. I’ve been trying to understand this deal."

King also repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium.

A legal expert on the CFIUS process told The Hill that the new revelation that the FBI knew that a Rosatom official was engaged in illegality on U.S. soil before the sale was approved could very well have affected the decision if that evidence had been made public in real time."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show





That's the problem with you Leftist acolytes....you're simply too stupid to keep up with changes in direction.....

You can "look" into anything you like. Whether the crap stayed here or was exported makes no difference. It's capitalism at work. If you don't like it then move to North Korea.

" Whether the crap stayed here or was exported makes no difference."

Then why did your side lie about it?



Quite a retreat on your part from this:


2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

 

[Guysguy]

This one seems to believe that the only way you can build nuclear weapons is to get uranium from the USA? Somehow that never stopped Russia, China, France, Germany, the UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. It won't stop anybody else either no matter who owns the companies that mine uranium in the United States. Capitalism says if you're buying them I'm selling. Get over it, Snowflake.

Another fifth columnist posting the usual "is not, issssss nootttttttt!!!' post.

I'm lovin' it.

Stop lovin' it and use your head for a change. Selling uranium doesn't sell out America. It doesn't stop or start the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the deal to sell that part of the company had "extreme vetting". It wasn't a bag of cash handed to Hillary at a coffee shop. She didn't even know of it nor would it matter if she did. You are posting a giant nothing burger for the lack anything better to do I guess.

Now that the outrageous bribery scandal has been revealed.....

...which Democrats are still endorsing it, you dunce????


"But it’s not just Republicans who have said that the revelation the FBI had evidence that Rosatom was engaged in criminality during the time it was receiving favorable decisions from the U.S. government deserves fresh scrutiny.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a member of both the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees, told The Hill she would like to learn more about what the FBI knew.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) has criticized Republicans for investigating Clinton, but said on “Morning Joe” last month he has "no problem looking into" the Uranium One deal.

And Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) said Sunday on CNN that he believed it was appropriate for Congress to investigate the new information.

“One of the House committees has already begun an oversight committee hearing," King said. "I always think oversight hearings are appropriate. I’ve been trying to understand this deal."

King also repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium.

A legal expert on the CFIUS process told The Hill that the new revelation that the FBI knew that a Rosatom official was engaged in illegality on U.S. soil before the sale was approved could very well have affected the decision if that evidence had been made public in real time."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show





That's the problem with you Leftist acolytes....you're simply too stupid to keep up with changes in direction.....

You can "look" into anything you like. Whether the crap stayed here or was exported makes no difference. It's capitalism at work. If you don't like it then move to North Korea.

" Whether the crap stayed here or was exported makes no difference."

Then why did your side lie about it?



Quite a retreat on your part from this:


2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

Lied or didn't lie I couldn't care less. The point is it doesn't matter where the crap goes. It's just business as usual.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

You can repeat these dishonest rants as often as you want but their not going to save your rapist lover, Donald Trump.

If only you had integrity. I'm betting you ran with the Party line in the 90s, "his private life (a REAL RAPIST), doesn't affect his job."

 

[Ava]

You can repeat these dishonest rants as often as you want but their not going to save your rapist lover, Donald Trump.

Ewww....just thinking of having him touch me in any way makes me want to regurgitate. But I'm thrilled I voted for him and as of this post would do so again. Just don't touch me, DJT.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Honey, are you naive? It can be processed into weapons grade.
But now, let’s see you quit ignoring the fact they lied about it’s export, why don’t we?

No, you choose to ignore the fact the Dems lied about it. Period. End of story.

(Wow, a new budget for paid progressive posters must have been developed in light of all the recent revelations, to try to help tamp down their further destruction)

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

The move escaped notice in Congress.

Officials at RSB, Cameco and Rosatom did not return repeated phone calls or emails seeking comment.

Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, stressing all the exports complied with federal law.

“None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said. “Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation.”

It's not weapons-grade. You make electricity from it not bombs. Stop wetting your panties over it.

What's the lie?

"What's the lie?"

Short term memory loss???


OK.....once again:

2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

Exporting things, including uranium, is a good thing you little moron. We do that here, we are capitalists.

Leftists aren't capitalists.....they're big government collectivists.


Me. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


You. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



" Franklin Roosevelt had pictured a place where citizens were joined in a collective enterprise ... Reagan pictured a more individualistic America where everyone would flourish once freed from the shackles of the state, and so the watchwords became self-reliance and small government."
The Liberal Crackup



You know nothing....other than the lock-step acceptance taught you in government school, huh?