I understand. We disagree. Thats ok. If someone hits me with a rock and steals my wallet, they defeated me in combat, but also committed theft. But I am going to focus on the OP and must remark how my ancestors stole most of Texas fair and square not from Mexico, but from the Comanches.
There are no Comanches in Columbia! She's no comanche!
I understand. We disagree. Thats ok. If someone hits me with a rock and steals my wallet, they defeated me in combat, but also committed theft. But I am going to focus on the OP and must remark how my ancestors stole most of Texas fair and square not from Mexico, but from the Comanches.
The problem with the obsession with the southern border is the fact that America stole the land from Mexico. So what we have today is another example of how our past, fueled by racism, has created the problems we have today.
Mexico wasn't called Mexico, it was split up into several different regions by tribe. I am talking about what America did, which was based on racism. The racism started in Europe, where the first Racial classifications were made up in the 1700's.
" The concept of race is one of the most problematic legacies of the Enlightenment. Most existing historiography on this concept frames its subject by two discontinuities. At the beginning of the story, we have the invention of race by European naturalists and anthropologists, marked by the publication of the book Systema naturae in 1735, in which the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus proposed a classification of humankind into four distinct races. At its end stands the demise of race as a viable biological concept after World War II in favor of population-genetic conceptions of human diversity, again prominently marked by the UNESCO Statement on Race issued in 1950."
The historiography of race is usually framed by two discontinuities: The invention of race by European naturalists and anthropologists, marked by Carl Linnaeus’s Systema naturae (1735); and the demise of racial typologies after WWII in favor of ...
Of course, you only focus on what the white man did, because to acknowledge what the tribes did to each other and what the Europeans did is inconvenient. Mexico was founded by land theft if you want to be accurate, yet you only want to blame America for liberating Texas.
Ever hear of a Frenchman called “ William the Conqueror “? He stole England from the Saxons. You don’t have a very good grasp of real history. However you do have a very vivid imagination.
Ever hear of a Frenchman called “ William the Conqueror “? He stole England from the Saxons. You don’t have a very good grasp of real history. However you do have a very vivid imagination.
The fact here is that most of them are relocating to a place that once belonged to them and was taken illegally. The South Africans should not be here.
The South Africans have a far better claim to political asylum than the faux asylum seekers from South and Central America and the Caribbean. You just hate the fact that they are white.
They spoke French, they used French style armor, weapons and tactics. You might as well say I am a Comanche because my great grandmother was a Comanche despite me not speaking a work of Comanche or following the culture.
They spoke French, they used French style armor, weapons and tactics. You might as well say I am a Comanche because my great grandmother was a Comanche despite me not speaking a work of Comanche or following the culture.
Spain tried to get Mexicans to settle in Texas, but they wouldn't do it because the Indians would kill them.
So Spain gave land grants to American settlers.
Then Mexico had their revolution and kicked out Spain.
Then Texas had their revolution and kicked out Mexico.
Then Mexico kept fxcking with America, until they were taught a lesson.
The problem with the obsession with the southern border is the fact that America stole the land from Mexico. So what we have today is another example of how our past, fueled by racism, has created the problems we have today.
Ah, and there you have it, folks: According to the woke left, we have no right to secure our southern border because we supposedly "stole" so much land from Mexico when we allowed Texas to join the Union and in the Mexican Cession after the Mexican-American War!
The linked video, which I've deleted, is a pathetic woke revision of history. It says nothing about the tyrannical rule and lawlessness that prevailed in the areas that later became Texas and California. Nor does it explain how the "Mexicans" came to possess "Mexico" in the first place: they violently took it from the native peoples in wars that make the Mexican-American War look mild in comparison.
“I believe it to be a war of pretexts, a war in which the true motive is not distinctly avowed, but in which pretenses, afterthoughts, evasions and other methods are employed to put a case before the community which is not the true case.”—Daniel Webster, September 1847
May marks two key anniversaries in the conflict between the United States and Mexico in that set in motion the Civil War—and led to California, Texas, and eight other states joining the Union.