How the Trump Administration Rushed to Judgment in Minneapolis Shooting - The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act.

[HikerGuy83]

Don't be a retarded ass....

He can't help it.

 

[Marener]

I dont know about thst

But if you prefer, substitute “scuffle” instead of “fisticuffs”

You should. It’s all on video. Pretti never used violence.

Violence was used against him.

 

[struth]

Pretti never punched a cop or took a swing at one.

You people just can’t stop lying.

Here he is spitting at cops, then going into a violent rage as their leaving kicking and destroying one of our vehicles



He then come back a few days later with a semi automatic weapon and forty rounds of ammo

 

[WorldWatcher]

Here he is spitting at cops, then going into a violent rage as their leaving kicking and destroying one of our vehicles



He then come back a few days later with a semi automatic weapon and forty rounds of ammo

The schuffle over a week before the events on the day he died has no bearing on an unarmed man being shot in the back 10 times.

WW

 

[struth]

The schuffle over a week before the events on the day he died has no bearing on an unarmed man being shot in the back 10 times.

WW

What unarmed man?

 

[Mac-7]

Pretti was attempting to help a woman that DHS Agents pushed to the ground.

For that he was pulled up, OC sprayed in the face multiple times, thrown to the ground and held down by 4-5 officers all while being blinded and in severe pain from skin, eyes, nose, and mouth contact with the OC Spary.

He didn't "engage" in anything, he was the victim.

WW

Yes, Pretti the unofficial Lone Ranger

The police were detaining a woman who did not want to be detained

That was none of Pretti’s business

 

[Mac-7]

What unarmed man?

Libs hang their hat on Pretti being unarmed just moments before he was shot

Bot law enforcement did not know that

The last fact thry knew was “He has a gun”

 

[struth]

Yes, Pretti the unofficial Lone Ranger

The police were detaining a woman who did not want to be detained

That was none of Pretti’s business

Yes Alex, out for blood after he was embarrassed after his last violent out burst a week prior, jumped in the middle of an active law enforcement action putting everyone’s life at risk

 

[struth]

Libs hang their hat on Pretti being unarmed just moments before he was shot

Bot law enforcement did not know that

The last fact thry knew was “He has a gun”

Claiming someone was unarmed because a cop was able to disarm him is rather dishonest

 

[WorldWatcher]

What unarmed man?

Pretti.

Officer Black Mask (red arrow) watch Officer Gray Coat (blue arrow) remove Pretti's holstered firearm from his back holster and exit the scrum.

The proceeded to shoot Pretti in the back.

WW
.
.
.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Yes Alex, out for blood after he was embarrassed after his last violent out burst a week prior, jumped in the middle of an active law enforcement action putting everyone’s life at risk

Pretti was videoing the event and held his camera in his hand the entire time, up to and including being shot in the back.

Hardly someone that was "out for blood", if that was the case he'd have had his firearm in his hand.

WW

 

[struth]

Pretti was videoing the event and held his camera in his hand the entire time, up to and including being shot in the back.

Hardly someone that was "out for blood", if that was the case he'd have had his firearm in his hand.

WW

And we saw him walk over to the person that was the subject of an arrest and either try to help them up, or stand in between them and the officer

Yes out for blood, carrying a semi auto and forty rounds

 

[struth]

Pretti.

Officer Black Mask (red arrow) watch Officer Gray Coat (blue arrow) remove Pretti's holstered firearm from his back holster and exit the scrum.

The proceeded to shoot Pretti in the back.

WW
.
.
.


View attachment 1216417

I didn’t see anymore move in that photo

 

[Marener]

Yes, Pretti the unofficial Lone Ranger

The police were detaining a woman who did not want to be detained

That was none of Pretti’s business

ICE was assaulting a woman.

Because to you psychos, if cops want to assault you, you’re supposed to just accept it.

 

[Mac-7]

Claiming someone was unarmed because a cop was able to disarm him is rather dishonest

Libs misrepresent

In the struggle one officer grabbed the firearm but never called out “ALL CLEAR! I HAVE THE GUN!”

And he may have accidently discharged the weapon which caused the other officers to open fire

 

[WorldWatcher]

I didn’t see anymore move in that photo

Because photo's "don't move", if they did we would call them a video.

The link below is to a video which shows movement. And it is the one I took the screen grab from. It cleary shows from two perspectives that Pretti was disarmed, that Officer Gray Coat exited the scrum and that the shot in the back occured AFTER he'd left the scrum.

Now think through this.

The video's do not show a discharge. The officer (I'll call him Officer Gray for his coat) that recovered the firearm left the scrum with the firearm in his right hand.

Human nature and especially for law enforcement, instinct is going to be to look in the direction of a firearm being discharged to assess the situation and any possible threat.

Now watch the videos, at the time the first shot is fired, Officer Gray looked over his shoulder to his LEFT because that appears to be where the sound comes from. He was holding Pretti's firearm in his right hand, if that gun had accidently discharged he wouldn't have looked left, he would have looked right at the weapon in his hand that had just fired.

The "accidental discharge" theory make no sense. As a matter of fact video analysis shows that the officer in the blank mask behind Pretti that had just watched Officer Gray exit the scrum was the first to fire based on sound, pointing the weapon, and his arm recoiling do to his discharge.

Now if a ballistic report shows the gun was discharged and compares a recovered shell casing against gun markings? Sure, I'll agree there was a discharge of Pretti's firearm.

WW
.
.
.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Claiming someone was unarmed because a cop was able to disarm him is rather dishonest

When the sequence was:

• Officer removes the firearm from the back holster,
• Officer exits the scrum with the firearm,
• Another officer that just watched the weapon be removed shoots the victim in the back

It is not dishonest to say the officer shot an unarmed man in the back.

WW

 

[Lesh]

Dont misrepresent

In the struggle one officer grabbed the firearm but never called out “ALL CLEAR! I HAVE THE GUN!”

And he may have accidently discharged the weapon which caused the other officers to open fire

Sounds like HE fucked up royally

 

[Mac-7]

ICE was assaulting a woman.

Because to you psychos, if cops want to assault you, you’re supposed to just accept it.

They were detaining/arresting a suspect

 

[Mac-7]

Sounds like HE fucked up royally

It was all happening very fast