How the Trump Administration Rushed to Judgment in Minneapolis Shooting - The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act.

You are the one who is sick. You and the Hodge clickbait boys. Pretti was not doing anythinng thee fools said.
I'm going to watch the video before I really go off on you. But by the woman's video I saw and you're reaction. I already know the truth.
 
Nope. No he did not.

next

New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.


Bullshit.... This is the same guy that's scuffled with agents last week. I don't care what he had in his hand.... If he had one gun on him he could have had two. Just because the video shows them removing a gun from him prior to the shooting does not mean that the officers did not feel threatened. It doesn't matter what the opinion is.... What matters is whether or not the officers genuinely felt threatened.

Split second decisions are often the difference between breathing and not breathing. It's easy to look at the video in retrospect but it's not so easy to place oneself in the shoes of the people at the moment.
 
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.
Congress Must Act.

Now, that's funny.
 
Bullshit.... This is the same guy that's scuffled with agents last week. I don't care what he had in his hand.... If he had one gun on him he could have had two. Just because the video shows them removing a gun from him prior to the shooting does not mean that the officers did not feel threatened. It doesn't matter what the opinion is.... What matters is whether or not the officers genuinely felt threatened.

Split second decisions are often the difference between breathing and not breathing. It's easy to look at the video in retrospect but it's not so easy to place oneself in the shoes of the people at the moment.
Especially when you don't know what's behind you.

They all get tied up with this guy and they have to be wondering if there isn't someone on the crowd drawing a bead and going unchallenged.
 
Nope. No he did not.

next

New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.


So many assumptions and so many out-and-out lies.
 
Everyone around trump takes on his stench, the stench of lies. These people lie to our face, even though video evidence prove they are lying. trump has been doing that very thing since he came down on the golden escalator, and you simple minded Magats fall for every lie.
You are correct, and a very large factor in that calculation is that Trump, his cabinet, and the vast majority of congress are functionally Zionists. They are bought and paid for by AIPAC and believe all the psychobabble put forth by the Zionist cause.
 
Nope. No he did not.

next

New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.


This is just gosh awful....and sad.
 
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.
Rush to judgement?

Kiss my ass. :shutupsmiley:



G_hDT62XkAAzNhk.webp
 
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.
The first incident was a little questionable. This second one is not at all.. The facts that matter are simple 1. Pretti did have a gun in his back pocket , Minnesota is a right to carry state and it was legal.2. At no time did Pretti reach for the weapon. 3. Three men had him pinned to the ground when a fourth man removed the gun from Pretti. 4. The first shot was fired on a helpless man with no weapon to defend himself.5. They kept shooting to make sure he was dead.
 
The first incident was a little questionable. This second one is not at all.. The facts that matter are simple 1. Pretti did have a gun in his back pocket , Minnesota is a right to carry state and it was legal.2. At no time did Pretti reach for the weapon. 3. Three men had him pinned to the ground when a fourth man removed the gun from Pretti. 4. The first shot was fired on a helpless man with no weapon to defend himself.5. They kept shooting to make sure he was dead.
Cut the bullshit until an entire review is released.
This is the same guy who got a rib broken after spitting on and kicking the tailight out on an ICE vehicle a week prior.
Doesn't excuse the shooting but he's not the saintly VA nurse the media built him up to be.
It's funny when the media gets punked by themselves.
 
15th post
Cut the bullshit until an entire review is released.
This is the same guy who got a rib broken after spitting on and kicking the tailight out on an ICE vehicle a week prior.
Doesn't excuse the shooting but he's not the saintly VA nurse the media built him up to be.
It's funny when the media gets punked by themselves.
And Stann laps it up like a shih tsu.
 
Cut the bullshit until an entire review is released.
This is the same guy who got a rib broken after spitting on and kicking the tailight out on an ICE vehicle a week prior.
Doesn't excuse the shooting but he's not the saintly VA nurse the media built him up to be.
It's funny when the media gets punked by themselves.
Does that changeanyoff the facts I listed above. No. I prefer the facts of the case , not the innuendo.
 
Does that change any off the facts I listed above. No. I prefer the facts of the case , not the innuendo.
Well no 'facts of the case' investigation have been released publicly unless you want to accept Internet lawyering for your findings.

Stann, it's quite evident you have made your mind up solely based on Internet evidence....and not legal findings. Of course we all realize you will not accept any investigative findings unless they suit your political views.
 
Back
Top Bottom