I-480 was part of an effort to connect the 101 via freeway from it's Bayshore section to the GG Bridge and counties to the north. It was a bad idea and an expensive one, which made it both a political and fiscal impossibility.
Doyle Drive, coming from the GG Bridge into the Marina is currently under major construction and will be safer, but it will still dump cars onto Van Ness Ave who want to continue south to Silicon Valley, San Jose and SoCAL; where it splits onto Park Presidio and then 19th Ave, for those wanting to go to SFSU or connect to 280 will remain a problem for a long long time.
Your point was irrelevant to the discussion and thus dishonest; supported by a very weak personal attack verifies what I already knew about you. Why not try to be honest?
No, my point was, and is, very relevant to the discussion. The city fathers had a blank slate to start with and they dithered and hymmed and hawed and still, 26 YEARS after the earthquake, the Bay area has fewer freeways than prior to the event.
Those are called facts. Your opinion about whether the I-480 was a worthwhile project is cute, but at the time, prior to the quake, it was a needed and funded project. Then the quake occurred and all bets were off.
Funny, I don't live in the area and I seem to know more than you do about the freeway systems, how is that possible?
You
believe you know, I know you're full of shit.
Freeway numbers are kinda new, when I first drove we referred to the highways by names - the Nimitiz, the Bayshore, The Coast, The Redwoods, the Great Highway, the Skyline and the Cyprus which collapsed in the '89 Quake.
Since the collapse of the Cypress, overpasses and bridges have been retrofitted (or replaced as was the eastern span of the Bay Bridge) all around the bay area. Something you fail to mention.
The Embarcadero Freeway was both an eyesore and a source of high traffic dumped onto surface streets, as well gridlock on service streets trying to get to the EF on ramp.
Yes, that is immaterial to my statement. Bridges that were destroyed were replaced, however as I said before there are fewer freeways now, than existed 26 years ago. No amount of wriggling can separate you from the ignorance you displayed by saying that was an untrue statement. It doesn't matter if the Embarcadero was an eyesore or not. IT MOVED TRAFFIC EFFICIENTLY! Something that the boulevard that replaced it does not.
You can call me names all you wish but the facts remain I know more about the freeway system there than you do. Funny how you call it the Nimitz, and not the Nitwitz like native Bay Area folks do. Where did you move to the Bay Area from?
Other than the EF, which was less than thee miles long, what freeways existed 26 years ago that are no longer in existence? I was born, raised and attended K - 12 in San Francisco. Went to CAL and returned to The City for graduate school. I still live in the Bay Area and still drive on the same freeways I did when I was 16.
I said, that the powers that be had not rebuilt back to the level that existed before the quake. How stupid are you? I mean you were able to pass a government employee test so you can't be entirely stupid but the Embarcadero Freeway is GONE. Replaced by a boulevard, you know the kind that has stop lights.
The Cypress structure was not rebuilt so the 880 has half the capacity it once had. Of course the I-480 is no longer needed because the freeway it was supposed to feed into was removed. Is this so hard for your tiny little head to wrap around? These are called FACTS. Instead of calling people names how about addressing the FACTS they present.
So, once again, where did you move to the Bay Area from?
The cypress has been rebuilt. Name others.
A large double-decker section in Oakland, known as the
Cypress Street Viaduct, collapsed during the 1989
Loma Prieta earthquake, causing 42 deaths; initial estimates were significantly higher, but because many commuters on both sides of the bay had left early or stayed late to watch Game 3 of the
San Francisco-
Oakland World Series, the freeway was far less crowded than normal at the time of the quake.
[23] This was the greatest loss of life caused by that
earthquake. Rebuilding the affected section of the freeway took nearly a decade, due to environmental impact concerns, the feeling that the freeway divided the
neighborhood,
designconsiderations and most importantly a huge outcry from the West Oakland community demanding that the freeway find a new route - not in West Oakland. The protest was successful. The freeway reopened in July 1997 on a new route parallel to railroad tracks around the outskirts of
West Oakland with the entire project being completed shortly before 2000.
Although only about three miles (5 km) in length, the replacement freeway cost over $1.2 billion, for several reasons: it crossed over
andunder the elevated
BART line to San Francisco; it squeezed between a post office, the West Oakland BART station, the Port of Oakland, a rail yard, and a sewage treatment plant; it occupied an entirely new right-of-way, which required the acquisition of large amounts of valuable industrial real estate near the Port of Oakland; and of course, it had to be earthquake-proof.
The former path of the structure, Cypress Street, was renamed
Mandela Parkway, and the median where the freeway stood became a landscaped linear park.
[24]