beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 48,420
- 18,830
- 2,250
Exactly, and this is where the nation groans exceedingly over such a situation, because people aren't getting their money's worth in these situations anylonger, even when they are in a huge pool that should easily afford them and their situations as found within the pool, yet they are continually coming out of these situations broke or threatened for the rest of their days, even though they had these high priced policies in which the insurance companies that sold them to them "figured" upon, that they would never hardly use them, and if they did well look out, because you are then placed in a risk category from that point onward, and if have to (I think), the insurance company will figure everyway that it can to get you off of their insurance. They will do this or have done this, even if it means dropping entire companies just to get the higher risk clients off of them.No, I don't think most people would place a dollar value on their life, which is why the idea that a completely open market will solve health care costs is sheer lunacy.
I don't see how you can draw that conclusion. Yes, life is priceless, but if someone needs healthcare that costs millions of dollars, who pays for it? People can say that their life is the most important thing to them, but when people buy ipods before insurance, it sure doesn't seem like it.
Because the amount owed after insurance is so huge anyway that it's not entirely rational to pay the very high cost of individual insurance.
(Pre-existing conditions was a testement to what the insurance companies think like and act out by not accepting those in the past with pre-existing conditions), in which showed that they were in it all for profits mainly, and not truly for the health of their entire nation as it should have always been in conjunction with. When company employee's are placed in a higher risk category because of the usage of their policies over and above another in their groups, it sends a huge flag up to the insurance company, where as it begins the process of elimination afterwards in which I have seen. I have had insurance all my life offered through my companies worked for, in which were only a few, but I have had multiple policies over the years (to many to count), because the insurance companies would either drive up their rates to levels that were un-exceptable in which led to the changes, and even though personally I have never used these polices much (very healthy), I still got taken by the system over the years, and have been raped when it came to my input over the years for something I never even used, and even so I got kicked out of the insurance companies pools over the years (because just as it should be others were using their policies), thus causing the flags to fly against the profits or bottom lines that were expected always by the board.
I was a part of the pool that was supposed to be holding up others because of my health being good, where as the insurance company could still pay for peoples problems in the pool, and still make a decent profit while handling the individual cases because many were just like me who were also within the pool, but that wasn't good enough for them, because it became that they wanted to profit beyond what anyone could give to them, and thus the rollercoaster ride began in this nation for many upn dealing with these giants who controlled to much of the industry in certain circles (monopolies), thus limiting choice and leaving many behind because of the numbers game being played at these institutiions for profit, and not for ones health as it should have been always instead.
Should insurance companies be (non-profit) organizations in anyones opinions ?