I'm pretty sure I don't give a rat's ass what people have been convinced to think about their healthcare system, particularly since most of them have never experienced any other sort of system. Making judgements based on feelings is a leftist thing; I prefer to make my judgements based on facts.
Fact 1: Nations with taxpayer-funded, government-controlled healthcare systems pay vastly higher taxes than the United States.
Fact 2: Those same nations tend to be plagued with less-desirable outcomes which I do not wish to incorporate into my healthcare, such as longer wait times for treatment, healthcare rationing, lower survival rates for serious illnesses such as cancer, and government intrusion into private decisions to a shocking degree.
Fact 3: The United States already has healthcare programs funded by taxes and administered by government bureaucrats, and they are anything but models of inexpensive, caring efficiency.
Also, on a more personal note, my husband had a friend from the UK who had moved to Arizona and was diabetic. British John, as we called him, used to gripe constantly about how much his insulin and supplies were costing him here in the US, as opposed to being "free" back when he was in the UK. Finally, my husband got tired of hearing it and did the math for him. All told, he was paying far less for his health insurance and co-pays for his diabetes than he had been for the taxes to get the "free" UK supplies. The real difference was that in the US, he could actually see the costs instead of having them hidden from him. And he was quite honest about his medical care being as good as or better than it had been back home. We never had to hear another word out of him on the subject after that.