The only thing that matters is whether or not the good guy's are winning against the bad guy's ...
Again, I must point out that's just not very is important to those left behind.
Doesn't anyone FEEL anything anymore?
Of course -- we FEEL grief and anger. But that's gonna fix stuff.
Largest issue is that the science of Psychology aint good enough at the moment
to identify and treat and isolate these timebombs. In fact -- it sucks because we
cannot trust individual judgements affecting the civil liberties of people who are
unstable. There needs to be QUANTITATIVE and scientific assessment of the danger.
Santa Barbara shooter was in counseling from the AGE OF EIGHT.. ONE definition of
public danger is if you've been in counseling SINCE THE AGE OF EIGHT.. YA THINK?
All that and the general coarsening of society.. The vulgararity, the sleasy easy porn, the violence themes of games and movies and the ridicule of people who get dressed early on Sunday and FORCE themselves to listen to inspiration to do good. All of that plays a role as well..
AND -- the press coverage.. MANY TOP anchors are REFUSING to name the shooters or show pictures of the creeps. Might not be a bad idea..
Wring your hands? redefine statistics? Or attempt to figure out what can be fixed?
CERTAINLY if there was a PROVEN measurement of sociopathic danger -- these people would have restricted access to weapons.. Because I KNOW that's why you posted this thread.. Sadly...