Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is a simple question of fact - but so far AG Barr has refused to say? Why is that? Reportedly, AG Barr has told Nadler today that it is "very substantial". What does "very substantial" mean? What do you think?
Apparently the DOJ has now confirmed that the Mueller Report is 300 plus pages.
As long as you are getting your 411 from Nadler, you don't know squat either...
What is 411? The 300 plus pages report was released by a DOJ official.
I fail to see how directory assistance enters into CNN and MSNBC reporting that a DOJ official confirmed that the Mueller Report is 300 plus pages. Do you?
That is a simple question of fact - but so far AG Barr has refused to say? Why is that? Reportedly, AG Barr has told Nadler today that it is "very substantial". What does "very substantial" mean? What do you think?
Just curious why are liberals whining about Barr when they had no issue with Rosenstein with holding information? Democrats went to great lengths to protect Rosenstein, and Rosenstein is working with Barr and Barr is a BFF with Mueller. Barr is a republican and Mueller is a republican. Why are you okay with Mueller and not Barr? Also why didn't democrats try and get the release of any information on TRUMP having interviewed Mueller for Comeys job before Rosenatein picked him to run the SC?
Rosenstein is a Republican who was appointed by Trump. Democrats had no control over that. However, we were pleased that Rosenstein hired Mueller as special prosecutor to investigate Trump. BTW, have you ever read Barr's 19-page letter before he was appointed by Trump? Mueller has a history of honor - Barr does not.
READ: Bill Barr's 19-Page Memo Ripping Mueller Probe | National Law Journal
That is a simple question of fact - but so far AG Barr has refused to say? Why is that? Reportedly, AG Barr has told Nadler today that it is "very substantial". What does "very substantial" mean? What do you think?
Just curious why are liberals whining about Barr when they had no issue with Rosenstein with holding information? Democrats went to great lengths to protect Rosenstein, and Rosenstein is working with Barr and Barr is a BFF with Mueller. Barr is a republican and Mueller is a republican. Why are you okay with Mueller and not Barr? Also why didn't democrats try and get the release of any information on TRUMP having interviewed Mueller for Comeys job before Rosenatein picked him to run the SC?
Rosenstein is a Republican who was appointed by Trump. Democrats had no control over that. However, we were pleased that Rosenstein hired Mueller as special prosecutor to investigate Trump. BTW, have you ever read Barr's 19-page letter before he was appointed by Trump? Mueller has a history of honor - Barr does not.
READ: Bill Barr's 19-Page Memo Ripping Mueller Probe | National Law Journal
Funny I don't recall a report on Hillary's emails or Benghazi having been released from the Obama DOJ...
That is a simple question of fact - but so far AG Barr has refused to say? Why is that? Reportedly, AG Barr has told Nadler today that it is "very substantial". What does "very substantial" mean? What do you think?
Just curious why are liberals whining about Barr when they had no issue with Rosenstein with holding information? Democrats went to great lengths to protect Rosenstein, and Rosenstein is working with Barr and Barr is a BFF with Mueller. Barr is a republican and Mueller is a republican. Why are you okay with Mueller and not Barr? Also why didn't democrats try and get the release of any information on TRUMP having interviewed Mueller for Comeys job before Rosenatein picked him to run the SC?
Rosenstein is a Republican who was appointed by Trump. Democrats had no control over that. However, we were pleased that Rosenstein hired Mueller as special prosecutor to investigate Trump. BTW, have you ever read Barr's 19-page letter before he was appointed by Trump? Mueller has a history of honor - Barr does not.
READ: Bill Barr's 19-Page Memo Ripping Mueller Probe | National Law Journal
Funny I don't recall a report on Hillary's emails or Benghazi having been released from the Obama DOJ...
You don't recall? Duh, all those hearings were PUBLIC. I watched them all on live TV. Did you?
That is a simple question of fact - but so far AG Barr has refused to say? Why is that? Reportedly, AG Barr has told Nadler today that it is "very substantial". What does "very substantial" mean? What do you think?
Just curious why are liberals whining about Barr when they had no issue with Rosenstein with holding information? Democrats went to great lengths to protect Rosenstein, and Rosenstein is working with Barr and Barr is a BFF with Mueller. Barr is a republican and Mueller is a republican. Why are you okay with Mueller and not Barr? Also why didn't democrats try and get the release of any information on TRUMP having interviewed Mueller for Comeys job before Rosenatein picked him to run the SC?
Rosenstein is a Republican who was appointed by Trump. Democrats had no control over that. However, we were pleased that Rosenstein hired Mueller as special prosecutor to investigate Trump. BTW, have you ever read Barr's 19-page letter before he was appointed by Trump? Mueller has a history of honor - Barr does not.
READ: Bill Barr's 19-Page Memo Ripping Mueller Probe | National Law Journal
Funny I don't recall a report on Hillary's emails or Benghazi having been released from the Obama DOJ...
You don't recall? Duh, all those hearings were PUBLIC. I watched them all on live TV. Did you?
If democrats wanted to have public hearing to investigate Russian involvement they shouldn't have whined about the need for a SC and they went on to allow Rosenstein to block and redact massive amounts of information and block any form of congressional oversight.
Barr should tell the Rats they can see the report the day Adam Schitt resigns from CONgress and watch them throw him overboard.
Barr should tell the Rats they can see the report the day Adam Schitt resigns from CONgress and watch them throw him overboard.
Why should Chairman Schiff resign? Because he scares the shit out of NaziCons? Schiff is a national hero!
Barr should tell the Rats they can see the report the day Adam Schitt resigns from CONgress and watch them throw him overboard.
Why should Chairman Schiff resign? Because he scares the shit out of NaziCons? Schiff is a national hero!
No, he's a pencil-neck, bug-eyed dork who's a liar, a leaker, and guilty of collusion when a prank caller posing as a russian told him he had "naked pictures of Trump". Adam got all excited, popped a tiny boner, and told the prankster he wanted to see them and to call his office back for details on the handoff. Schitt is going down....HARD.
That is a simple question of fact - but so far AG Barr has refused to say? Why is that? Reportedly, AG Barr has told Nadler today that it is "very substantial". What does "very substantial" mean? What do you think?
Funny. Aside from your childish personal attacks on Schiff - all that other conspiracy bullshit has been thoroughly debunked by Snopes and others.
"debunked"?
I fail to see how directory assistance enters into CNN and MSNBC reporting that a DOJ official confirmed that the Mueller Report is 300 plus pages. Do you?
I'm in no big hurry - so long as the truth all comes out. In the meantime - Trump is taking a victory lap like he's all in the clear. I seriously doubt he's in the clear.