The answer to this question should be obvious based on the context of the conversation. So answer for me why?
The country isn't full of nuts. That MSM and Political propaganda. I've never been shot, threatened with a gun, or anyone ever pull out a gun in my presence in a threatening way. However, the left would like you to be believe so. So which narrative do you believe, propaganda or statistical facts?
And this is why I do advocate for training for those that want to own firearms responsibly. There are idiots out there, I think every gun owner in America can agree to that point. There is a lot to think about when it comes to either mandatory training or involuntary training. Perhaps involuntary training could allow for the owner for better protection legally, or greater penalties if they break laws that were outlined in training.
You've never been kicked by a mule then have you.
Anything can be an assault weapon. I see plenty of idiots driving 2 ton vehicles while aimlessly entranced by their phones every day, yet, our gov't and tech giants do little to stop those higher risk encounters. Phone laws are in place, but I don't see them enforced.
True story, first time I fired a shotgun I was told how to hold but, but didn't pull it into the shoulder with any pressure. My shoulder hurt for a few days after that.
There are a number of shotguns fed by removable magazines. Here are a few of the best:
I would have to shorten the stock drastically for any shotgun to fit in the soft part of my shoulder. It always sits on the shoulder bone, and that hurts like hell. Even then I would add a recoil pad.
Aim is NOT affected by recoil unless you are an idiot who is pulling the trigger as fast as you can. Even with an AR-15, you have to reacquire your sight alignment after a shot and the AR-15 has a very minor recoil.
I ran the pistol range for my unit's officers in the Army because I had shot match in my reserve unit. EVERY single officer was flinching from the recoil of the M-1911A1s we used in those days. The all complained that the pistols were inaccurate. I told them to give me the pistol they thought was the worst and put seven rounds in the head of a target at 10 meters in rapid fire. I then told them what they were doing wrong and played the game where I'd load the pistol with either an empty mag or a loaded one until they stopped flinching as they pulled the trigger. After that they could all match my score, but they shot at center of mass rather than the showy head shots I used as a demonstration. Recoil isn't an obstacle to accurate shooting unless you are either poorly trained or trying to shoot something like a M-2 fifty caliber machine gun offhand which I don't recommend.
Training that you propose generally sucks! There is no one shooting back! You have to develop a mindset of no fear to get the job done. I volunteered training special ops troops in urban combat. They are trained to shoot back while being shot at! Some of them are outstanding shots, hitting me in the left hand with their first shot so my weapon is very difficult to shoot accurately. Of course, that is usually followed by several shots center mass and a head shot, especially if I am exposed, which I try not to happen.
In a “target rich environment” like a mall or a school the recoil on an AR is so slight it would hardly matter. Pray and spray.
So you are ignoring all the magazine fed shotguns I posted. Why am I not surprised. You always ignore FACTS that don't agree with your OPINIONS.
A lot and many. Of the twelve listed nine have STANDARD magazines holding more than six rounds and the other three have extended magazines available.
How many black people did Rittenhouse shoot?
You are SO good and finding new and unusual ways to be wrong
Until that happens:
Another idiot speaks.
Another idiot speaks.
.... and he dropped the mag.
Another idiot speaks.
Another idiot speaks.
Because you don't have any idea what you;re talking about.
Another idiot speaks.
