how long should it continue?

[Seawytch]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.

Do you really think that with all the leaks that have occurred that if there was ANY damaging evidence against Trump that we wouldn't know about it by now? The only reason why the investigation is still ongoing is for political purposes and that's it.

I'm sure you said the exact same thing about Benghazi, right?

No, they didn't. Every single one of these "time to end this investigation" dumbfucks cheered each and every one of the gazillion investigations that went well into 2015.

 

[Doc1]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.

Do you really think that with all the leaks that have occurred that if there was ANY damaging evidence against Trump that we wouldn't know about it by now? The only reason why the investigation is still ongoing is for political purposes and that's it.

utter bull crud

russian speak

We know, the investigation is a wet dream for you, TDS at it's finest.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

One day less than the Benghazi witchhunt.

Did the four people Obie and shrillary get killed return to life?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

No evidence?

That's ril funny but how is it you RWNJ Pootarian traitors haven't noticed the constant flow of very incriminating evidence. Just the lies are more than enough.

This same thing went on during both the Nixon and Reagan investigations went on for what seemed like forever and the nutters were lined up, whining and bitching, every inch of the way.

Why aren't the RWNJs demanding his investigation continue nail were certain our democracy and elections are safe from foreign meddling?

Why are they okay with the enormous lies from ALL players associated with rump? Including Eric the Sleaze, Little DonDon and the daughter-wife.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[tyroneweaver]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

Until byu can beat ohio state in the nc volley ball game

 

[Luddly Neddite]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

One day less than the Benghazi witchhunt.

Did the four people Obie and shrillary get killed return to life?

They didn't kill anyone.

However, there's a very good possibility that had the Repubs not cut embassy security and then refused both President Obama's and Secty Clinton's equestrian for more security, those people would not have been killed.

Don't you find it reprehensible that, among the lying Repubs who voted to take security away, were Trey Gowdy and Jason Chaffetz?

Nasty little crooked Chaffetz planned for an entire career feeding at the public trough but instead, dump "won" the election. Faced with having to deal with corrupt drump, he turned tail and ran.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Care4all]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.

Do you really think that with all the leaks that have occurred that if there was ANY damaging evidence against Trump that we wouldn't know about it by now? The only reason why the investigation is still ongoing is for political purposes and that's it.

utter bull crud

russian speak

We know, the investigation is a wet dream for you, TDS at it's finest.

From when Donald Trump was on the Primary debate stage and compared his hand size to his pee pee size, I have not been a fan of him ever being President...knew he was over his head then and since then....



before that, I thought he was kind of funny, a real bizarre self centered showman, and followed him from way young....since he and Ivana went through their troubles and mistress problems and divorced....

 

[NYcarbineer]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

One day less than the Benghazi witchhunt.

Did the four people Obie and shrillary get killed return to life?

Did the 4000 Bush killed? Did the REPUBLICANS conclude that Hillary and/or Obama committed ANY crimes?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Trump presidency and everyone associated with it are now doomed, politically, no matter what happens.

 

[Doc1]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.

Do you really think that with all the leaks that have occurred that if there was ANY damaging evidence against Trump that we wouldn't know about it by now? The only reason why the investigation is still ongoing is for political purposes and that's it.

utter bull crud

russian speak

We know, the investigation is a wet dream for you, TDS at it's finest.

From when Donald Trump was on the Primary debate stage and compared his hand size to his pee pee size, I have not been a fan of him ever being President...knew he was over his head then and since then....



before that, I thought he was kind of funny, a real bizarre self centered showman, and followed him from way young....since he and Ivana went through their troubles and mistress problems and divorced....

I detest him, but there is no proof of anything at all yet, nothing.

 

[Doc1]

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?

One day less than the Benghazi witchhunt.

Did the four people Obie and shrillary get killed return to life?

They didn't kill anyone.

However, there's a very good possibility that had the Repubs not cut embassy security and then refused both President Obama's and Secty Clinton's equestrian for more security, those people would not have been killed.

Don't you find it reprehensible that, among the lying Repubs who voted to take security away, were Trey Gowdy and Jason Chaffetz?

Nasty little crooked Chaffetz planned for an entire career feeding at the public trough but instead, dump "won" the election. Faced with having to deal with corrupt drump, he turned tail and ran.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

I'm going to laugh at you, the Pubs never cut security. Hillary pulled the Team on August 11th same year. General Ham OFFERED to incease the detail and testified before Congress that the budget had not been cut. Stevens told him that he himself could not ask the General direct , that it must come from the State Dept itself. Sorry.

 

[Eloy]

Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.

The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.

That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.

It is the subject of liberal hysterics. Nothing more

The FBI protects Americans and upholds the Constitution by investigating crime seriously. Not even a billionaire president is above the law.

 

[Eloy]

Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.

The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.

That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.

Yes, I know. Do I need to ask my question again? It's been a fucking year, how long does it take to find any incriminating evidence? Are you seriously trying to tell me if the FBI or anyone else had incriminating evidence against Trump or his campaign vis-a-vis the hacking/collusion that we wouldn't know about it by now?

The FBI is aware of sufficient evidence to continue their investigation of the Trump personnel's suspicious contacts with the Russians. When all the information is known, a report will be made to Congress and the Dept. of Justice.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.

The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.

That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.

It is the subject of liberal hysterics. Nothing more

The FBI protects Americans and upholds the Constitution by investigating crime seriously. Not even a billionaire president is above the law.

When he's charged with a crime let me know. Until then I will keep laughing at you fools

 

[Eloy]

As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.

Do you really think that with all the leaks that have occurred that if there was ANY damaging evidence against Trump that we wouldn't know about it by now? The only reason why the investigation is still ongoing is for political purposes and that's it.

utter bull crud

russian speak

We know, the investigation is a wet dream for you, TDS at it's finest.

From when Donald Trump was on the Primary debate stage and compared his hand size to his pee pee size, I have not been a fan of him ever being President...knew he was over his head then and since then....



before that, I thought he was kind of funny, a real bizarre self centered showman, and followed him from way young....since he and Ivana went through their troubles and mistress problems and divorced....

I detest him, but there is no proof of anything at all yet, nothing.

The FBI will produce the proof if it is found.

 

[task0778]

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.

The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.

That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.

Yes, I know. Do I need to ask my question again? It's been a fucking year, how long does it take to find any incriminating evidence? Are you seriously trying to tell me if the FBI or anyone else had incriminating evidence against Trump or his campaign vis-a-vis the hacking/collusion that we wouldn't know about it by now?

The FBI is aware of sufficient evidence to continue their investigation of the Trump personnel's suspicious contacts with the Russians. When all the information is known, a report will be made to Congress and the Dept. of Justice.

Where did you get this from? I think you made it up out of thin air. Seriously, to date NO ONE in any of our investigative agencies has said anything about 'sufficient evidence' on Trump or his people.

 

[Eloy]

The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.

That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.

It is the subject of liberal hysterics. Nothing more

The FBI protects Americans and upholds the Constitution by investigating crime seriously. Not even a billionaire president is above the law.

When he's charged with a crime let me know. Until then I will keep laughing at you fools

Keep tuned to TV news (except Fox News) and you will be informed.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Tv news lol

 

[task0778]

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.

That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.

It is the subject of liberal hysterics. Nothing more

The FBI protects Americans and upholds the Constitution by investigating crime seriously. Not even a billionaire president is above the law.

When he's charged with a crime let me know. Until then I will keep laughing at you fools

Keep tuned to TV news (except Fox News) and you will be informed.

As I suspected, you got absolutely nothin'. Does it bother you to spread outright lies like that?

 

[Eloy]

The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.

That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.

Yes, I know. Do I need to ask my question again? It's been a fucking year, how long does it take to find any incriminating evidence? Are you seriously trying to tell me if the FBI or anyone else had incriminating evidence against Trump or his campaign vis-a-vis the hacking/collusion that we wouldn't know about it by now?

The FBI is aware of sufficient evidence to continue their investigation of the Trump personnel's suspicious contacts with the Russians. When all the information is known, a report will be made to Congress and the Dept. of Justice.

Where did you get this from? I think you made it up out of thin air.

The Acting FBI Director said so when testifying before the Senate Intelligence when he explained that the agency considers the investigation of the Trump campaign is serious and ongoing.