how long should it continue?

We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?
Considering there was never any legitimate basis for the investigation in the first place, a year ago.
 
We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?
As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.
lol If it is not evidence of criminal activity what is it evidence of?

Business as usual. Does anyone think the Clinton campaign had no meetings or conversations with the Russians or any other foreign gov'ts?
 
We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?
As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.
lol If it is not evidence of criminal activity what is it evidence of?

Business as usual. Does anyone think the Clinton campaign had no meetings or conversations with the Russians or any other foreign gov'ts?
Stop changing the subject.
 
why would you want to end this counter intelligence investigation?

I'm talking about the criminal investigation

It should end when they say it's complete, and present their findings. Just like any other investigation. Right?
lol How will you know when it is complete? When you have investigated for a year and found nothing? 2 years and found nothing? Ten years and found nothing? There was never any legitimate basis for the investigation in the first place.
 
We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?
As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.

Comey and others have testified that there is no evidence of collusion between Russia and trump. Having the FBI say it again will satisfy you?

Never heard that!!
 
We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?
Good question. It just took 2 days for Comey to review the entire Clinton case and say she was free from the indictment process. How many emails did they have to go through? Tens of thousands in such a short time? Impossible.
 
We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?
As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.
lol If it is not evidence of criminal activity what is it evidence of?

Business as usual. Does anyone think the Clinton campaign had no meetings or conversations with the Russians or any other foreign gov'ts?
Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.
 
We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?
As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.

Comey and others have testified that there is no evidence of collusion between Russia and trump. Having the FBI say it again will satisfy you?

Never heard that!!
James Clapper, Obama's DNI, has said he has seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government as have Democratic senators, Diane Feinstein and Joe Manchin.
 
We know the investigation into Russia and trump has gone on for almost a year. As of this day we have on the record testimony that there is no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia. How long do we continue this investigation when there is no evidence? If you are for more investigations, at what point would you be satisfied that no evidence exists? If there is no evidence in six months? In a year? 4?
As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.
lol If it is not evidence of criminal activity what is it evidence of?

Business as usual. Does anyone think the Clinton campaign had no meetings or conversations with the Russians or any other foreign gov'ts?
Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.
The FBI sees it differently from you.
 
As soon as the FBI or DOJ announces that the evidence that they are investigating has yielded proof or no proof of criminal actions. Of course there is evidence, what do you think they have been investigating for a year? There wouldn't be an investigation if there wasn't evidence. What hasn't been shown is proof that the evidence shows criminal activity or not.
lol If it is not evidence of criminal activity what is it evidence of?

Business as usual. Does anyone think the Clinton campaign had no meetings or conversations with the Russians or any other foreign gov'ts?
Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.
The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.
 
lol If it is not evidence of criminal activity what is it evidence of?

Business as usual. Does anyone think the Clinton campaign had no meetings or conversations with the Russians or any other foreign gov'ts?
Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.
The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.
That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.
 
Business as usual. Does anyone think the Clinton campaign had no meetings or conversations with the Russians or any other foreign gov'ts?
Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.
The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.
That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.
It is the subject of liberal hysterics. Nothing more
 
Business as usual. Does anyone think the Clinton campaign had no meetings or conversations with the Russians or any other foreign gov'ts?
Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.
The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.
That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.

Yes, I know. Do I need to ask my question again? It's been a fucking year, how long does it take to find any incriminating evidence? Are you seriously trying to tell me if the FBI or anyone else had incriminating evidence against Trump or his campaign vis-a-vis the hacking/collusion that we wouldn't know about it by now?
 
Stop changing the subject.

Just answering a question. The truth is that the democrats will seize on ANYTHING to delay and disrupt the Trump agenda, and that includes trying to prolong this investigation all the way to 2020 if they can, in an attempt to smear Trump. Which would be okay if there was anything behind the story to indicate any wrongdoing, you know like classified emails that should have been protected but were found on a unprotected server. But after all this time, over year and there is nothing. NOTHING. It's about time to pull the plug on this fishing expedition IMHO.
The FBI sees it differently from you.

Show me the quote from the FBI where they said they have any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or someone is his campaign that indicates collusion with the Russians over the DNC hacking.
That is the subject of a serious ongoing FBI investigation.
It is the subject of liberal hysterics. Nothing more

It's politics. Delay and disrupt. It's what everybody seems to do in Washington if they are the minority party. Those of us outside the beltway want things to get done but it doesn't happen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top