red states rule
Senior Member
- May 30, 2006
- 16,011
- 573
- 48
I beg to disagree. let's leave it at that.
It is hard for you to prove my list of what Dems want to do - since it is true
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I beg to disagree. let's leave it at that.
If it comes down to Rudy or Hillary - the voters wil go with Rudy
Libs are a fine bunch to lecture the folks on values after the 15 years of defending Bill
I don't think they are lecturing per say rsr, it is more speculation based on how they have seen the Religious Right stand on issues of importance, they do not think that the Religious right will run out and vote for him, even if he was up against Hillary.
I agree with that, I don't think they will either, at least based on my own Religious Right Relatives on my husband's side...
Care
It is hard for you to prove my list of what Dems want to do - since it is true
and how will the religious left go?
Trust me, Hillary will fire up the conservative base very well
I do think democrats need to be honest about what they want to do. If the american people wanted them to end the war, and they didnt. Is that not that not doing the peoples business?. Just a thought. Remember im neutral on the iraq war right now.
I don't think they are lecturing per say rsr, it is more speculation based on how they have seen the Religious Right stand on issues of importance, they do not think that the Religious right will run out and vote for him, even if he was up against Hillary.
I agree with that, I don't think they will either, at least based on my own Religious Right Relatives on my husband's side...
Care
When MM says "lets agree to disagree" he is caught and can't counter the facts
Dems do want to raise taxes, increase spending, add more pork to the spending bills, have the government run the health care indistry, appoint judges that make law from the bench, appease terrorists, and surrender in Iraq
I do think democrats need to be honest about what they want to do. If the american people wanted them to end the war, and they didnt. Is that not that not doing the peoples business?. Just a thought. Remember im neutral on the iraq war right now.
I think the religious right, needs to calm down a bit. If the choice is between hillary and rudy, they better get off their arrogant ass, and vote for rudy. Since when does a candidate have to agree with everything you stand for.
That sounds more like intellectual elitism, and its not just the right, so please dont start /
and how would you suggest that democrats end the war? Pass a bill and send it to the president? Been there done that. It is impossible for a party without a veto proof majority to run anything by a president of the opposite party without his consent.
When MM says "lets agree to disagree" he is caught and can't counter the facts
Dems do want to raise taxes, increase spending, add more pork to the spending bills, have the government run the health care indistry, appoint judges that make law from the bench, appease terrorists, and surrender in Iraq
I am tired of the same old flatulent Rush rhetoric from you...it never changes. Of course I want to raise taxes - on the wealthy who got a tax break from Dubya.... of course I want to increase spending - on schools and families and healthcare...of course I do not want to add pork...I do not want government to RUN the health care industry but to help subsidize it so that all americans have some minimal baseline healthcare coverage. I do want to appoint more liberal judges, but that does not mean that I want them to "make laws"... I do not want to appease terrorists and I do not want to surrender to anyone anywhere.
That's all you got....same old oneliner talking points that you keep repeating. It really gets boring. That is why I suggested we agree to disagree....because I really would like to move on to something new with someone who has something new to say. OK?
and how would you suggest that democrats end the war? Pass a bill and send it to the president? Been there done that. It is impossible for a party without a veto proof majority to run anything by a president of the opposite party without his consent.
I am tired of the same old flatulent Rush rhetoric from you...it never changes. Of course I want to raise taxes - on the wealthy who got a tax break from Dubya.... of course I want to increase spending - on schools and families and healthcare...of course I do not want to add pork...I do not want government to RUN the health care industry but to help subsidize it so that all americans have some minimal baseline healthcare coverage. I do want to appoint more liberal judges, but that does not mean that I want them to "make laws"... I do not want to appease terrorists and I do not want to surrender to anyone anywhere.
That's all you got....same old oneliner talking points that you keep repeating. It really gets boring. That is why I suggested we agree to disagree....because I really would like to move on to something new with someone who has something new to say. OK?
That's all you got....same old oneliner talking points that you keep repeating. It really gets boring. That is why I suggested we agree to disagree....because I really would like to move on to something new with someone who has something new to say. OK?
what part of that did you not understand the first time?
Dems want ALL the tax cuts repealed. Even on the lowest wage earners and retired folks. They are increasing spending across the board and the pork is increasing past what Republicans spent
The "wealthy" are pating a huge majority of the taxes. The top 25% pat 85% of Federal income taxes - how much more do you want from them?
Liberal judges DO make law from the bench - that is why Dems want them on the bench, so they can invent laws
Anyone who needs medical care can get it - we do not need "health care fo all"
Dems are not standing up to the terrorists, they are willing to walk away from the fight and hope they will leave us alone
They can cut off the funding - but they do not have the political guts to do it
Their party means more to them then anything else