Or, there is risk.That is curious Kondor. By that reckoning Hamas, when it fires rockets is not at risk of hitting ANY civilians in Israel. According to you.
There is simply a laughable lack of accuracy, which renders the attempted comparison of shielding against intentionally-targeted munitions fire comedic.
The risk being that a rocket is aimed at Village A but ends-up hitting Village B, or an open-field a few K's from town.
So what's the excuse for those ever so accurate bombing runs into Gaza hitting schools and hospitals?
IDF Has the capability to take out targets very accurately yet still manages to kills a great many civilians...
Please don't come back with Hamas Human Shield...
The only way you can say they killed a lot of civilians is if you calculate how many separate attacks Israel did and divide it with how many civilians were killed.
Fir example, if Israel only launched 10 artillery shells, but killed 1000 Palestinians, then that's pretty bad accuracy.
Bit the fact is that Israel launched thousands of separate shells, bombs, missiles in a condensed area like Gaza.

