How is it the Right is Biased but the Left are not?

[martybegan]

Many republicans deny basic science like evolution.

Many democrats invent "science" like man made global warming.






I'm not sure which is worse to be honest.

This!

The point TM was to show just how dumb you sound...

There you go denying science.


The scientific field agrees global warming is effected by mans activities

They agree it is likely that temperature is affected by anthropogenic sources. Unlike you scientists dealing with a system as large as our atmosphere rarely deal in absolutes, thats why thier findings are filled with words like "possibly" "could" and "correlation". The issue becomes when people take the studies referenced and try to use them to further thier political goals, kind of like you do, only smarter.

 

[peach174]

Many republicans deny basic science like evolution.

Many democrats invent "science" like man made global warming.






I'm not sure which is worse to be honest.

This!

The point TM was to show just how dumb you sound...

There you go denying science.


The scientific field agrees global warming is effected by mans activities

Junk science agrees. Real science is still out about it, they are still open minded and still looking at all of the evidence.

 

[Leweman]

I see the Liberals as being the most biased.
The Majority of news and newspapers hire liberals, over conservatives.
The Entertainment industry has more liberals than conservatives. And if you speak out that you are conservative, you a bypassed for any real good roles.
The majority of scientists are liberal with only 6% being conservative.
The majority of college professors are liberal.
There is a very small amount of or no representation in unions or the AARP.
All of our public schools system is based on liberal ideology.
Any woman who calls herself conservative is blasted and to hell with equal opportunity by liberal women's groups.
So who is biased?

Yes, the more educated or creative a person is, the more likely it is that they are liberal.

Educated? Maybe ... Intelligent. Nope.

 

[Truthmatters]

Liberals don't believe in facts

Then why is it you guys keep trying to deny science, rewrite history, deny the very definitions of words, spew hate on teachers, scientists, historians, economists and call anyone who doesn't agree with you all sorts of stupid names?

The left always does the things you just listed better than the right.
We all agree that there is global warming, we disagree that it is mankind that is causing it.Science says man effects GW
The left has always rewritten history,because it doesn't fit with their socialism.Its the right who now claims the generation that fought and won WWII were too stupid to understand FDRs policies
The left are the ones who will not accept the definition of words.Give and example of this
We do not hate teachers we don't like the leaders of the unions.Your party has blamed teachers for decades
We correct historians who have rewritten history.No you try to rewrite history to meet your needs
The left are the ones who will not listen to the economists or our businesses.Then why do you deny that the stimuls worked when the economists said it did?
The left are always better at calling names and accusing.

You call me names all the time and I dont return the trick.

 

[peach174]

I see the Liberals as being the most biased.
The Majority of news and newspapers hire liberals, over conservatives.
The Entertainment industry has more liberals than conservatives. And if you speak out that you are conservative, you a bypassed for any real good roles.
The majority of scientists are liberal with only 6% being conservative.
The majority of college professors are liberal.
There is a very small amount of or no representation in unions or the AARP.
All of our public schools system is based on liberal ideology.
Any woman who calls herself conservative is blasted and to hell with equal opportunity by liberal women's groups.
So who is biased?

Yes, the more educated or creative a person is, the more likely it is that they are liberal.

Do you ever listen to what you say? Talk about biased.
Conservatives are just as educated and creative as any liberals.
There is stupid people in both ideologies.

 

[Truthmatters]

I see the Liberals as being the most biased.
The Majority of news and newspapers hire liberals, over conservatives.
The Entertainment industry has more liberals than conservatives. And if you speak out that you are conservative, you a bypassed for any real good roles.
The majority of scientists are liberal with only 6% being conservative.
The majority of college professors are liberal.
There is a very small amount of or no representation in unions or the AARP.
All of our public schools system is based on liberal ideology.
Any woman who calls herself conservative is blasted and to hell with equal opportunity by liberal women's groups.
So who is biased?

Yes, the more educated or creative a person is, the more likely it is that they are liberal.

Educated? Maybe ... Intelligent. Nope.

Well when you are so partisan you define intelligence by party affliation then you would think that

 

[martybegan]

I see the Liberals as being the most biased.
The Majority of news and newspapers hire liberals, over conservatives.
The Entertainment industry has more liberals than conservatives. And if you speak out that you are conservative, you a bypassed for any real good roles.
The majority of scientists are liberal with only 6% being conservative.
The majority of college professors are liberal.
There is a very small amount of or no representation in unions or the AARP.
All of our public schools system is based on liberal ideology.
Any woman who calls herself conservative is blasted and to hell with equal opportunity by liberal women's groups.
So who is biased?

Yes, the more educated or creative a person is, the more likely it is that they are liberal.

Do you ever listen to what you say? Talk about biased.
Conservatives are just as educated and creative as any liberals.
There is stupid people in both ideologies.

Just look at truthmatters, who couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag, with large rips in it, and its a really big paper bag, i mean, the exits are obvious, he just can't seem to find his way out. Its sad actually.

 

[Ernie S.]

Facts have a liberal bias

No, liberals have a bias against facts, as you so often prove.

 

[NoNukes]

I see the Liberals as being the most biased.
The Majority of news and newspapers hire liberals, over conservatives.
The Entertainment industry has more liberals than conservatives. And if you speak out that you are conservative, you a bypassed for any real good roles.
The majority of scientists are liberal with only 6% being conservative.
The majority of college professors are liberal.
There is a very small amount of or no representation in unions or the AARP.
All of our public schools system is based on liberal ideology.
Any woman who calls herself conservative is blasted and to hell with equal opportunity by liberal women's groups.
So who is biased?

Yes, the more educated or creative a person is, the more likely it is that they are liberal.

Educated? Maybe ... Intelligent. Nope.

You probably go to FOX for 'intelejent' people.

 

[Immanuel]

This!

The point TM was to show just how dumb you sound...

There you go denying science.


The scientific field agrees global warming is effected by mans activities

They agree it is likely that temperature is affected by anthropogenic sources. Unlike you scientists dealing with a system as large as our atmosphere rarely deal in absolutes, thats why thier findings are filled with words like "possibly" "could" and "correlation". The issue becomes when people take the studies referenced and try to use them to further thier political goals, kind of like you do, only smarter.

Speaking just for me, it is not whether or not mankind has affected the environment but rather the fear-mongering that goes along with the Gore campaign to send mankind back to the stone ages.

I believe in protecting the environment. I think we should make every effort to be "green" and I believe we will.

Unfortunately, the GW liberals (and not all liberals fit in that category) want to sell their philosophy and their products to force the rest of the world to live like they think we should while they profit on our compliance.

Immie

 

[NoNukes]

I see the Liberals as being the most biased.
The Majority of news and newspapers hire liberals, over conservatives.
The Entertainment industry has more liberals than conservatives. And if you speak out that you are conservative, you a bypassed for any real good roles.
The majority of scientists are liberal with only 6% being conservative.
The majority of college professors are liberal.
There is a very small amount of or no representation in unions or the AARP.
All of our public schools system is based on liberal ideology.
Any woman who calls herself conservative is blasted and to hell with equal opportunity by liberal women's groups.
So who is biased?

Yes, the more educated or creative a person is, the more likely it is that they are liberal.

Do you ever listen to what you say? Talk about biased.
Conservatives are just as educated and creative as any liberals.
There is stupid people in both ideologies.

Read the list though. Scientists, college professors, etc.

 

[Immanuel]

Yes, the more educated or creative a person is, the more likely it is that they are liberal.

Educated? Maybe ... Intelligent. Nope.

Well when you are so partisan you define intelligence by party affliation then you would think that

Pot meet kettle

Immie

 

[Truthmatters]

How very original and very full of lies

 

[Dr.Drock]

.: U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works :: Minority Page :.

Highlights of the Updated 2008/2009 Senate Minority Report featuring over 700 international scientists dissenting from man-made climate fears:

“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.

“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical...The main basis of the claim that man’s release of greenhouse gases is the cause of the warming is based almost entirely upon climate models. We all know the frailty of models concerning the air-surface system.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology, and formerly of NASA, who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”



Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.

 

[peach174]

Then why is it you guys keep trying to deny science, rewrite history, deny the very definitions of words, spew hate on teachers, scientists, historians, economists and call anyone who doesn't agree with you all sorts of stupid names?

The left always does the things you just listed better than the right.
We all agree that there is global warming, we disagree that it is mankind that is causing it.Science says man effects GW
The left has always rewritten history,because it doesn't fit with their socialism.Its the right who now claims the generation that fought and won WWII were too stupid to understand FDRs policies
The left are the ones who will not accept the definition of words.Give and example of this
We do not hate teachers we don't like the leaders of the unions.Your party has blamed teachers for decades
We correct historians who have rewritten history.No you try to rewrite history to meet your needs
The left are the ones who will not listen to the economists or our businesses.Then why do you deny that the stimuls worked when the economists said it did?
The left are always better at calling names and accusing.

You call me names all the time and I dont return the trick.

Well it depends on your point of view. I say for you to get actual facts, like going to thomas.gov and reading the actual bills.
I say go to the libray and read some books on history instead of getting it from the inertnet.
If that's name calling then so be it.
To me name calling is saying things like bitch, stupid,not enough marbels upstairs.
I don't do that.

 

[martybegan]

There you go denying science.


The scientific field agrees global warming is effected by mans activities

They agree it is likely that temperature is affected by anthropogenic sources. Unlike you scientists dealing with a system as large as our atmosphere rarely deal in absolutes, thats why thier findings are filled with words like "possibly" "could" and "correlation". The issue becomes when people take the studies referenced and try to use them to further thier political goals, kind of like you do, only smarter.

Speaking just for me, it is not whether or not mankind has affected the environment but rather the fear-mongering that goes along with the Gore campaign to send mankind back to the stone ages.

I believe in protecting the environment. I think we should make every effort to be "green" and I believe we will.

Unfortunately, the GW liberals (and not all liberals fit in that category) want to sell their philosophy and their products to force the rest of the world to live like they think we should while they profit on our compliance.

Immie

The problem they face is they have to explain very complicated systems, models and formulas to non scientific people. It is far easier to convince people not experts or at least basically knowledgeable in the field by trying to scare them than trying to convince them.

A layperson doesnt understand what the hell an X% increase in CO2 or a 0.5 M increase in sea level means. They do understand ZOMG its 100 DEGREES OUT GOLBAL WARMING.

 

[Truthmatters]

There you go denying science.


The scientific field agrees global warming is effected by mans activities

They agree it is likely that temperature is affected by anthropogenic sources. Unlike you scientists dealing with a system as large as our atmosphere rarely deal in absolutes, thats why thier findings are filled with words like "possibly" "could" and "correlation". The issue becomes when people take the studies referenced and try to use them to further thier political goals, kind of like you do, only smarter.

Speaking just for me, it is not whether or not mankind has affected the environment but rather the fear-mongering that goes along with the Gore campaign to send mankind back to the stone ages.

I believe in protecting the environment. I think we should make every effort to be "green" and I believe we will.

Unfortunately, the GW liberals (and not all liberals fit in that category) want to sell their philosophy and their products to force the rest of the world to live like they think we should while they profit on our compliance.

Immie

No way, you mean business people use politics to make money?


We are a capitalistic society, making money is a good thing right?


Now if you can make money and help the country take a path that will benifit them in the end why do you see that as some horrible thing?


Now what do you think about companies that use politics to hold progress back because they own the OLD tech and make big bucks off of it.

That is what the Gore plan is fighting.

 

[peach174]

Yes, the more educated or creative a person is, the more likely it is that they are liberal.

Do you ever listen to what you say? Talk about biased.
Conservatives are just as educated and creative as any liberals.
There is stupid people in both ideologies.

Read the list though. Scientists, college professors, etc.

That is what I am talking about.
Liberal infiltrated institutions who will not hire conservatives because they are biased.

 

[Truthmatters]

That is not fact and is merely your opinion

 

[peach174]

The numbers don't lie.
There is only 6% of conservatives in the science field.
The college's will not hire equal amounts of college professor's, who are conservative as well as liberal.
Some liberal college's will not allow conservative view points to be heard. Or guest speakers.