They agree it is likely that temperature is affected by anthropogenic sources. Unlike you scientists dealing with a system as large as our atmosphere rarely deal in absolutes, thats why thier findings are filled with words like "possibly" "could" and "correlation". The issue becomes when people take the studies referenced and try to use them to further thier political goals, kind of like you do, only smarter.
Speaking just for me, it is not whether or not mankind has affected the environment but rather the fear-mongering that goes along with the Gore campaign to send mankind back to the stone ages.
I believe in protecting the environment. I think we should make every effort to be "green" and I believe we will.
Unfortunately, the GW liberals (and not all liberals fit in that category) want to sell their philosophy and their products to force the rest of the world to live like they think we should while they profit on our compliance.
Immie
No way, you mean business people use politics to make money?
We are a capitalistic society, making money is a good thing right?
Now if you can make money and help the country take a path that will benifit them in the end why do you see that as some horrible thing?
Now what do you think about companies that use politics to hold progress back because they own the OLD tech and make big bucks off of it.
That is what the Gore plan is fighting.