How hard is it

OP
buckeye45_73

buckeye45_73

Lakhota's my *****
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
30,429
Reaction score
4,569
Points
1,130
It should be automatic for death certificates to be accounted for by the Registrar's office. But, that would take more "nanny-Statism". Right wingers only seem to like the nanny-State when it involves the general warfare and common offense not the general welfare or common defense.
how is that nanny statism? Voting is a constitutional right.....when you're dead you should be off the rolls......it's not hard nor difficult.
Any public sector intervention is nanny-Statism for the right wing, not True free market capitalism like they allege in socialism threads.
Dipshit, I'm not a pure libertarian....I don't mind SOME regulation.....making sure people don't sell spoiled meat is good regulation.....telling someone they have to have mirrors in their bathrooms for people 3' tall incase a dwarf is going to use it, is complete bullshit....
So I'm fine with making sure voter rolls are accurate and it's a government ability labeled in the constitution...voting rights.....so yeah it's not only acceptable, but should be done.
Here is the rub:

I read it, whats the rub?
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,580
Reaction score
1,976
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
It should be automatic for death certificates to be accounted for by the Registrar's office. But, that would take more "nanny-Statism". Right wingers only seem to like the nanny-State when it involves the general warfare and common offense not the general welfare or common defense.
I understand the first part of your post, and you're right.
What is the rest of that shit you're posting?
I am not calling anyone a moron.
Not sure I said anything about a moron....did I?
No, but do other posters not complain about that from some other posters, but do complain about my use of rhetoric not merely ad hominems regarding right wingers which is consistent with my view of right propaganda and rhetoric? Seems like right wing bias.
ad hominems? I mean the left just calls names.....they rarely discuss an actual issue.......

The left: Why don't we have discussions on race?
The Right: because you won't discuss things seriously
The Left: What do you mean?
The Right: I despise BLM
The Left: Wait you don't value black lives? You must be a white supremacist!
Simple stereotypes. I resort to the fewest fallacies while right wingers tend have nothing but ad hominems and other forms of fallacies. It sometimes seems that right wingers would have no arguments at all, if they can't resort to fallacy.
that's not a stereotype.....the left does that all the time.....
Ben Shapiro is going to speak?
Instead of not attending they try:
to get the school to disinvite
if that doesnt work, they try to drive up security costs
they show up and protest
and they call him a NAZI


Sorry man, your side does that shit.....mine does not prevent people from speaking....maybe if Bin Laden wanted to........but it's very very rare and usually justified...
Typical right wing modus operandi is to simply ban people. Insist left wingers have good arguments or you are going to call them right wingers.
 
OP
buckeye45_73

buckeye45_73

Lakhota's my *****
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
30,429
Reaction score
4,569
Points
1,130
It should be automatic for death certificates to be accounted for by the Registrar's office. But, that would take more "nanny-Statism". Right wingers only seem to like the nanny-State when it involves the general warfare and common offense not the general welfare or common defense.
I understand the first part of your post, and you're right.
What is the rest of that shit you're posting?
I am not calling anyone a moron.
Not sure I said anything about a moron....did I?
No, but do other posters not complain about that from some other posters, but do complain about my use of rhetoric not merely ad hominems regarding right wingers which is consistent with my view of right propaganda and rhetoric? Seems like right wing bias.
ad hominems? I mean the left just calls names.....they rarely discuss an actual issue.......

The left: Why don't we have discussions on race?
The Right: because you won't discuss things seriously
The Left: What do you mean?
The Right: I despise BLM
The Left: Wait you don't value black lives? You must be a white supremacist!
Simple stereotypes. I resort to the fewest fallacies while right wingers tend have nothing but ad hominems and other forms of fallacies. It sometimes seems that right wingers would have no arguments at all, if they can't resort to fallacy.
that's not a stereotype.....the left does that all the time.....
Ben Shapiro is going to speak?
Instead of not attending they try:
to get the school to disinvite
if that doesnt work, they try to drive up security costs
they show up and protest
and they call him a NAZI


Sorry man, your side does that shit.....mine does not prevent people from speaking....maybe if Bin Laden wanted to........but it's very very rare and usually justified...
Typical right wing modus operandi is to simply ban people. Insist left wingers have good arguments or you are going to call them right wingers.
Wow, you're not even clever.....we all know the left bans in the name of racism, it's the only play you have.....
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top