- Dec 29, 2008
- 19,716
- 4,751
- 280
Oh please.
In none of those cases did the hostile party make it their goal to have the President fail. You're such a drama queen.
In all of these cases the hostile legislatures opposed the administration's proposals, but Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Romney managed to prevail nonetheless. The difference today is not that the Congress in more hostile than those were in the past but that Obama is less competent than those leaders.
Oh baloney. Never before has the opposing party set out with their only goal being to make the President fail and stating ahead of time they would all vote against him - no matter what. In all of the above cases the opposing party did not act in lockstep to obstrcut legislation.The entire Republican plan for the past 4 years has been to obstruct plain and simple, they have stated essentially that and their voting record reflects it. Not a single one of them voted for ObamaCare even though it was a fucking REPUBLICAN idea to begin with! What fuckin' more do you need to know?
That's the conspiracy theory the Democrats are pushing to explain Obama's incompetence, but if you examine his career, it is clear that he has failed to achieve any notable accomplishments in any job he has ever had, so his failure as President should come as no surprise and it shouldn't require a conspiracy theory to explain.