They didn't attack us, because WE HAVE ICBM's, also.Russia has had ICBMs aimed at us for over 50 yearsYou are really laughable, RW. Does your security clearance give this privileged information, or are you assuming you're right?Protecting ourselves and our assets isn't a benefit? Really?I support space programs that provide a benefit and make senseWho thinks we do not already have one? Right now it is under the purview of the air force, kind of like how the air used to belong to the army until a separate command was created.
The question here is if space is in need of its own command or can the air force handle it along with airspace close to earth.
I don't understand the left's general dislike of space programs. Cost should be irrelevant when speaking to the left - I thought government spending was a boon for the economy and better for the country. Suddenly that is no longer the case?
Space Force doesn’t
Nobody is threatening our assets
Spending billions to fight imaginary threats in space is as wasteful as spending $30 billion for a wall against imaginary threats
Russia's Kosmos 2521 satellite could very well be a weaponized satellite. Yet, you call that imaginary only because they haven't used
it yet. Seems you would rather react to a tragedy than be proactive in preventing a tragedy.
It's a new age, the horse and buggy has been replaced, try and catch up, dude.
They do not attack us because they know the retaliation would be fierce
Same as our satellites
You're not even putting up a good argument, RW.