How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

[abu afak]

The Sun does warm the Earth and caused most PREVIOUS Warm periords, with CO2 lagging but Exacerbating the problem.
.. but now/THIS TIME the Sun's radiation hitting the earth has NOT changed in at least 50 years.. yet it is warming.

What has changed is the ever and Rapidly increasing/Spiking (50%) concentration/Density of our Fossil Fuel Burning GHG (CO2/CH4/etc) Blanket is trapping the heat and preventing Re-Radiation back out into space.

`

And the CO2 problem is CUMULATIVE.
It stays in the atmosphere for 5-200 years.
If we cut worldwide emissions 50% or even 80% (which we are not) the problem would still get worse Every year.

The last time we had over 400PPM CO2 the temp was higher and melting/Sea Level was 50' Higher.
We are in the Oven, just waiting waiting for the Earth catch up/'Cook Through.'


MEANWHILE we are constantly Turning up the Oven Temp/GHG effect!

`

 

[CrusaderFrank]

CO2 is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo powerful, but never does dick in a lab experiment

Odd

 

[abu afak]

CO2 is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo powerful, but never does dick in a lab experiment

Odd

Google: 'co2 lab experiments warming'

Search Results​

Videos

4:00 YouTube · Erik Christensen

The Greenhouse Gas Demo
YouTube · Erik Christensen
Jun 13, 2011

3 key moments in this video

2:08
YouTube · AusEarthEd

Greenhouse Effect (II): Enhanced Greenhouse Effect
YouTube · AusEarthEd
Feb 22, 2021

5 key moments in this video

2:37
YouTube · carltfross

Carbon Dioxide Trapping of Earth's Heat - A Laboratory ...
YouTube · carltfross
Jan 13, 2013

A simple experiment on global warming - Journals​

Royal Society
https://royalsocietypublishing.org › doi › rsos.192075
by YA Levendis · 2020 · Cited by 5 — A simple experiment has been developed to demonstrate the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) gas in the Earth's atmosphere.
Introduction
Experimental design
Experimental results
Theoretical calculations

LAB ACTIVITY: GETTING TO KNOW CO2​

Global Monitoring Laboratory (.gov)
https://gml.noaa.gov › info_activities › pdfs › Tea...

PDF

PROCEDURE: 1. Prepare the limewater to use as the indicator for CO2. Mix 1 teaspoon of lime powder with 1 cup of water.
6 pages

Carbon Dioxide and Air Temperature Lab Instructions​

NASA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (.gov)
https://gpm.nasa.gov › files › lesson_plan_files
PDF
Greenhouse gases don't hold in heat exactly the same way as the plastic wrap, but using various methods of adding actual carbon dioxide doesn't produce ...
2 pages

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Search Results​

Videos

View attachment 1108189
4:00
YouTube · Erik Christensen

The Greenhouse Gas Demo
YouTube · Erik Christensen
Jun 13, 2011

View attachment 1108194

3 key moments in this video

View attachment 1108190

2:08

YouTube · AusEarthEd

Greenhouse Effect (II): Enhanced Greenhouse Effect
YouTube · AusEarthEd
Feb 22, 2021


View attachment 1108191

5 key moments in this video

View attachment 1108192

2:37
YouTube · carltfross

Carbon Dioxide Trapping of Earth's Heat - A Laboratory ...
YouTube · carltfross
Jan 13, 2013

Feedback

---

View all

A simple experiment on global warming - Journals​

View attachment 1108196
Royal Society
https://royalsocietypublishing.org › doi › rsos.192075
by YA Levendis · 2020 · Cited by 5 — A simple experiment has been developed to demonstrate the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) gas in the Earth's atmosphere.
Introduction
Experimental design
Experimental results
Theoretical calculations

LAB ACTIVITY: GETTING TO KNOW CO2​

View attachment 1108195
Global Monitoring Laboratory (.gov)
https://gml.noaa.gov › info_activities › pdfs › Tea...

PDF

PROCEDURE: 1. Prepare the limewater to use as the indicator for CO2. Mix 1 teaspoon of lime powder with 1 cup of water.
6 pages

Carbon Dioxide and Air Temperature Lab Instructions​

View attachment 1108193
NASA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (.gov)
https://gpm.nasa.gov › files › lesson_plan_files


PDF

Greenhouse gases don't hold in heat exactly the same way as the plastic wrap, but using various methods of adding actual carbon dioxide doesn't produce ...
2 pages

All fake shit experiments that NEVER show a temperature increase when going from 280 to 420 PPM

NEVER

NEVER EVER

NOT ONE TIME

 

[CrusaderFrank]

All fake shit experiments that NEVER show a temperature increase when going from 280 to 420 PPM

NEVER

NEVER EVER

NOT ONE TIME

It's like 20 years now we ask, "Can you show us the evidence linking temperature increase to CO2 increase from 280 to 420PPM?" -- and you can't do it

Does 280 to 320 cause a .5F increase? Can you show that?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Sun does warm the Earth and caused most PREVIOUS Warm periords, with CO2 lagging but Exacerbating the problem.
.. but now/THIS TIME the Sun's radiation hitting the earth has NOT changed in at least 50 years.. yet it is warming.

What has changed is the ever and Rapidly increasing/Spiking (50%) concentration/Density of our Fossil Fuel Burning GHG (CO2/CH4/etc) Blanket is trapping the heat and preventing Re-Radiation back out into space.


View attachment 1108182

`
View attachment 1108183


And the CO2 problem is CUMULATIVE.
It stays in the atmosphere for 5-200 years.
If we cut worldwide emissions 50% or even 80% (which we are not) the problem would still get worse Every year.

The last time we had over 400PPM CO2 the temp was higher and melting/Sea Level was 50' Higher.
We are in the Oven, just waiting waiting for the Earth catch up/'Cook Through.'


MEANWHILE we are constantly Turning up the Oven Temp/GHG effect!

View attachment 1108184


`

Blanket is trapping the heat and preventing Re-Radiation back out into space.

Who says you're too old and stupid to learn something?

 

[ding]

The Sun does warm the Earth and caused most PREVIOUS Warm periords, with CO2 lagging but Exacerbating the problem.
.. but now/THIS TIME the Sun's radiation hitting the earth has NOT changed in at least 50 years.. yet it is warming.

What has changed is the ever and Rapidly increasing/Spiking (50%) concentration/Density of our Fossil Fuel Burning GHG (CO2/CH4/etc) Blanket is trapping that Radiation and preventing it from Otherwise being reflected back out into space.


View attachment 1108174

`
View attachment 1108175


And the CO2 problem is CUMULATIVE.
It stays in the atmosphere for 5-200 years.
If we cut worldwide emissions 50% or even 80% (which we are not) the problem would still get worse Every year.

The last time we had over 400PPM CO2 the temp was higher and melting/Sea Level was 50' Higher.
We are in the Oven, just waiting waiting for the Earth catch up/'Cook Through.'


MEANWHILE we are constantly Turning up the Oven Temp/GHG effect!

View attachment 1108176


`

Correlation does not prove causation. You are mistaking the natural warming of an interglacial period for AGW.

 

[ding]

The Sun does warm the Earth and caused most PREVIOUS Warm periords, with CO2 lagging but Exacerbating the problem.
.. but now/THIS TIME the Sun's radiation hitting the earth has NOT changed in at least 50 years.. yet it is warming.

What has changed is the ever and Rapidly increasing/Spiking (50%) concentration/Density of our Fossil Fuel Burning GHG (CO2/CH4/etc) Blanket is trapping the heat and preventing Re-Radiation back out into space.


View attachment 1108182

`
View attachment 1108183


And the CO2 problem is CUMULATIVE.
It stays in the atmosphere for 5-200 years.
If we cut worldwide emissions 50% or even 80% (which we are not) the problem would still get worse Every year.

The last time we had over 400PPM CO2 the temp was higher and melting/Sea Level was 50' Higher.
We are in the Oven, just waiting waiting for the Earth catch up/'Cook Through.'


MEANWHILE we are constantly Turning up the Oven Temp/GHG effect!

View attachment 1108184


`

Spamming the same thing doesn't change the fact that... Correlation does not prove causation. You are mistaking the natural warming of an interglacial period for AGW.

 

[ding]

Google: 'co2 lab experiments warming'

Search Results​

Videos

View attachment 1108189
4:00 YouTube · Erik Christensen

The Greenhouse Gas Demo
YouTube · Erik Christensen
Jun 13, 2011

View attachment 1108194

3 key moments in this video

View attachment 1108190

2:08
YouTube · AusEarthEd

Greenhouse Effect (II): Enhanced Greenhouse Effect
YouTube · AusEarthEd
Feb 22, 2021


View attachment 1108191

5 key moments in this video

View attachment 1108192

2:37
YouTube · carltfross

Carbon Dioxide Trapping of Earth's Heat - A Laboratory ...
YouTube · carltfross
Jan 13, 2013

A simple experiment on global warming - Journals​

View attachment 1108196
Royal Society
https://royalsocietypublishing.org › doi › rsos.192075
by YA Levendis · 2020 · Cited by 5 — A simple experiment has been developed to demonstrate the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) gas in the Earth's atmosphere.
Introduction
Experimental design
Experimental results
Theoretical calculations

LAB ACTIVITY: GETTING TO KNOW CO2​

View attachment 1108195
Global Monitoring Laboratory (.gov)
https://gml.noaa.gov › info_activities › pdfs › Tea...

PDF

PROCEDURE: 1. Prepare the limewater to use as the indicator for CO2. Mix 1 teaspoon of lime powder with 1 cup of water.
6 pages

Carbon Dioxide and Air Temperature Lab Instructions​

View attachment 1108193
NASA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (.gov)
https://gpm.nasa.gov › files › lesson_plan_files
PDF
Greenhouse gases don't hold in heat exactly the same way as the plastic wrap, but using various methods of adding actual carbon dioxide doesn't produce ...
2 pages

From simple physics the radiative forcing from CO2 calculates to be 1C per doubling of CO2. That's it. It's even in the IPCC reports.

 

[abu afak]

From simple physics the radiative forcing from CO2 calculates to be 1C per doubling of CO2. That's it. It's even in the IPCC reports.

Every post you make is a Lie or Misleading statement.
(ie, Many Obsolete, Modified and Homemade graphs from Nowhere, etc)

1°C per Doubling IPCC says?

AI Overview

• • IPCC Assessment:
    The IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) provides a range for Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS), the temperature increase after the climate system reaches a new equilibrium following a CO2 Doubling. The report indicates that ECS is likely between 2.5°C and 4.0°C, and very likely between 2.0°C and 5.0°C.

`

 

[ding]

Every post you make is a Lie or Misleading statement.
(ie, Many Obsolete, Modified and Homemade graphs from Nowhere, etc)

1°C per Doubling IPCC says?

AI Overview

• • IPCC Assessment:
    The IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) provides a range for Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS), the temperature increase after the climate system reaches a new equilibrium following a CO2 Doubling. The report indicates that ECS is likely between 2.5°C and 4.0°C, and very likely between 2.0°C and 5.0°C.

`

They kind of hide it because they are dishonest and want to fool people like you. But it's in their chart as "emergent" which means the instantaneous radiative effect. Everything else is feedback from their faulty models.

 

[ReinyDays]

AI Overview ...

Garbage in ... garbage out ... AI is the replacement for thought now ...

Just flat lazy ...

 

[abu afak]

Garbage in ... garbage out ... AI is the replacement for thought now ...

Just flat lazy ...

AI specifically Citing the IPCC is "Garbage?"
Compared to Ding's truly Lazy Lie/Fabrication I Busted?
Or all your Un-cited IRRELEVANT dropping of physics terms?

As I said, Your MENTAL Problem/Dishonesty is wanting to be RW-cool by bashing the Truth.
instead of Ever criticizing Hoard of of RW AGW deniers who dominate this place.
You are a DISHONEST little POS who was OUTED be me.

Tell the board YOU believe in AGW and they are wrong.
Go ahead, you SPINELESS POS.
`

 

[ReinyDays]

AI specifically Citing the IPCC is "Garbage?"
Compared to Ding's truly Lazy Lie/Fabrication I Busted?
Or all your Un-cited IRRELEVANT dropping of physics terms?

As I said, Your MENTAL Problem/Dishonesty is wanting to be RW-cool by bashing the Truth.
instead of Ever criticizing Hoard of of RW AGW deniers who dominate this place.
You are a DISHONEST little POS who was OUTED be me.

Tell the board YOU believe in AGW and they are wrong.
Go ahead, you SPINELESS POS.
`

Can you yell a little louder? ...
[giggle] ...

"vorticity" ... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...

 

[abu afak]

Embarrassed huh.
That was the point.
POST ON TOPIC PLEASE CHILD.

Garbage in ... garbage out ... AI is the replacement for thought now ...

Just flat lazy ...

AI specifically Citing the IPCC is "Garbage?"
Compared to Ding's truly Lazy Lie/Fabrication I Busted?
Or all your Un-cited IRRELEVANT dropping of physics terms?

As I said, Your MENTAL Problem/Dishonesty is wanting to be Popular / RW-cool by bashing the Truth.
instead of Ever criticizing Hoard of of RW AGW deniers who dominate this place.
You are a DISHONEST little POS who was OUTED be me.

Tell the board YOU believe in AGW and they are wrong.
Go ahead, you SPINELESS POS.
`