How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

there's a thing called bibles and scrolls where history was documented. You should go to school and learn how to educate yourself.
They kept track of the temperature?

Nothing from Jesus' day survived. Isn't that weird? Chinese, Italy, all over the world, history was being documented and saved. But NOTHING from God's visit survived. Interesting huh?

Do you even know when the first bible was written?
 
GNR_SchoolBusRoofTornado-WinterboroAL031625.jpg

 
They kept track of the temperature?

Nothing from Jesus' day survived. Isn't that weird? Chinese, Italy, all over the world, history was being documented and saved. But NOTHING from God's visit survived. Interesting huh?

Do you even know when the first bible was written?
you should read up on the shroud of turin

 
you should read up on the shroud of turin


What a joke. You may as well tell me the Mother Mary in your piece of toast is a sign from god. LOL.

There is no evidence to support any of the claims made in the Bible concerning the existence of a god. Any ‘evidence’ proposed by theists to support the Bible’s various historical and supernatural claims is non-existent at best, manufactured at worst.

The Bible is not self-authenticating; it is simply one of many religious texts. Like those other texts, it itself constitutes no evidence for the existence of a god. Its florid prose and fanciful content do not legitimise it nor distinguish it from other ancient works of literature.

The Bible is historically inaccurate, factually incorrect, inconsistent and contradictory. It was artificially constructed by a group of men in antiquity and is poorly translated, heavily altered and selectively interpreted. Entire sections of the text have been redacted over time.

There is no contemporary evidence for Jesus’ existence or the Bible’s account of his life; no artefacts, dwellings, works of carpentry, self-written manuscripts, court records, eyewitness testimony, official diaries, birth records, reflections on his significance or written disputes about his teachings. Nothing survives from the time in which he is said to have lived.

All historical references to Jesus derive from hearsay accounts written decades or centuries after his supposed death. These historical references generally refer to early Christians rather than a historical Jesus and, in some cases, directly contradict the Gospels or were deliberately manufactured.

The Gospels themselves contradict one-another [2] on many key events and were constructed by unknown authors up to a century after the events they describe are said to have occurred. They are not eyewitness accounts. The New Testament, as a whole, contains many internal inconsistencies as a result of its piecemeal construction and is factually incorrect on several historical claims, such as the early existence of Nazareth, the reign of Herod and the Roman census. Like the Old Testament, it too has had entire books and sections redacted.

The Biblical account of Jesus has striking similarities with other mythologies and texts and many of his supposed teachings existed prior to his time. It is likely the character was either partly or entirely invented [2] by competing first century messianic cults from an amalgamation of Greco-Roman, Egyptian and Judeo-Apocalyptic myths and prophecies.

Even if Jesus’ existence could be established, this would in no way validate Christian theology or any element of the story portrayed in the Bible, such as the performance of miracles or the resurrection. Simply because it is conceivable a heretical Jewish preacher named Yeshua lived circa 30 AD, had followers and was executed, does not imply the son of a god walked the Earth at that time.

The motivation for belief in a divine, salvational Jesus breaks down when you accept evolution:

“Now, if the book of Genesis is an allegory, then sin is an allegory, the Fall is an allegory and the need for a Savior is an allegory – but if we are all descendants of an allegory, where does that leave us? It destroys the foundation of all Christian doctrine—it destroys the foundation of the gospel.” – Ken Ham

See also: Evidence for Jesus, Did Jesus Exist? [2][3], Why I am not a Christian (a must read), the Christological Argument, Hitchens – Core of the Jesus myth and Christianity is Immoral (both must watch).

“Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.” – Anonymous

sogk1.jpg
 
How are you accounting for water vapor's roll in the convective transfer of energy? ... mind you, that's 2,100 J/g for the latent heat of evaporation ... that much energy raises the temperature of a gram of air 2,100ºC ... is that what you mean? ...

Your "positive feedback loop" fails conservation laws my friend ... please explain why carbon dioxide goes up and temperatures go down between 1940 and 1980 ...

YOU are a FRAUD who just seeks to dump as many Physics Terms you can into your pointless chatter.

You Cannot and have Not laid out your position on AGW (or Not) lest you lose your Status/Wanted Persona of a RWer.

What is your position on AGW you FRAUD?
Tell all the Dumbbells you post with.

`
 
The Discovery of Global Warming by Spencer Weary

 
The only good thing about the 5 word TrollS jc456 (and Ding, ToadstoolParrot) is you can choose when to reply and bump a meaty thread.

EDIT: and ToasterParrot has done it again below.
while ReinyDays, who doesn't know if there's AGW OR NOT! continues wasting everyone's time dropping irrelevant Physics terms in the section.
`
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom