There will always be those who choose to be without wealth and those unwilling to work cooperatively or competitively to acquire and create wealth.
That's a given. What is more difficult to understand is why some are convinced that this maxim applies to all disadvantaged people.
Extend unemployment benefits? Nope! Get a job! That's substantially easier said than done. Most of the unemployed want to work, but the opportunity to work is no longer available.
Of course, we must simultaneously consider, along with other fiscal policies, whether the increased taxation necessitated by further extension of such programs has a marked effect upon the ability of individuals to reintroduce their funds into the market through discretionary spending and/or of businesses to reinvest in their business through either further expansion and purchase of materials wholesale or through the growth of their staff (that is, through hiring new employees).
I've not seen the numbers.
As a social democrat, I support the existence of a social safety net for our citizens. However, we must balance such concerns with what will best help the economy grow in the long run so those people can once again find gainful employment and become self-supporting.
In California, I saw waht happens when people do nothing to help people become gainfully employed and make them too comfortable in their poverty. With 2 hot meals a day and a bag lunch, showers every day, free clothes, a shelter next door, bus passes, no drug tests, and no requirement to prove you were actively seeking employment, people literally spent years in and around the shelter and the center next to it. It did nothing to alleviate the problem and the resulting environment was toxic to those who with intentions of improving their lot.
Back in my home State, I saw things done right. Random drug tests, regular meetings with a case worker, and a strict policy that if you were late a single time during the first stage of the program, you were out. Strict documentation of the businesses you'd contacted and whom you spoken with, as well as other policies, helped people find work while weeding out those who weren't serious about improving their condition. So long as you did as you were supposed to, they'd alleviate you emergency needs for food and clothing and help place you in first a shelter and then a housing program.
It's the difference between handouts and a hand up.