How come England was so fast counting their vote? It didn't take them 6 days like 2020 in america.

[emilseine]

Look I'm not big on Biden myself, although I don't like Trump at all. But let's stick to the facts.

 

[Adrenochrome Junkie]

England has more dumbass brainwashed liberals which means they don’t have to cheat as hard.

They still worship and bow down to kings, queens, princes, princesses…

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How come england was able to count its votes faster than us which took 6 days in 2020?

It varies from State to State, as each State has its own process.

In several states, nearly every vote was counted on election night.

Other states without the infrastructure in place to handle so many mail ballots took longer. States that have used mail ballots for years counted much more quickly.

 

[rightwinger]

Yeah england doesn't have as many people as us, but it took us 6 days and only b/c of a handful of states which weren't nearly as populated as england. Can you explain it?

California has a population the size of England and was able to declare the winner on election night

Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nevada and Georgia were very close and needed multiple recounts

Thankfully, we got it right

 

[bripat9643]

It varies from State to State, as each State has its own process.

In several states, nearly every vote was counted on election night.

Other states without the infrastructure in place to handle so many mail ballots took longer. States that have used mail ballots for years counted much more quickly.

And, of course, in some states the Dims took a long time to gather up all the fake Biden ballots.

 

[TeeDub]

Most states declared on election night

Those that were close took longer to count all the mail in ballots and conduct recounts

The key is we got it right

Wrong there were 3 or 4 states that quit counting and resumed the next day.

 

[francoHFW]

No not on me but I know it's true. How would you explain it?

2020 was the height of the epidemic, lots of absentee/mail in ballots duh...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And, of course, in some states the Dims took a long time to gather up all the fake Biden ballots.

Sorry, nobody outside your embarrassing cult buys into that fantasy.

 

[francoHFW]

And, of course, in some states the Dims took a long time to gather up all the fake Biden ballots.

Brainwashed functional moron much?

 

[bripat9643]

Sorry, nobody outside your embarrassing cult buys into that fantasy.

It's a documented fact, douchebag.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's a documented fact, douchebag.

Poor little cultist has gone off the deep end. And he ain't coming back.

 

[emilseine]

I'm just asking how England which has about 80 million people was able to counts the votes faster (because that's alot more votes than was in the battleground states, see england had more votes to count than those states had, now america as a whole is bigger but those individual states counted slower than england) how do you explain this?

 

[emilseine]

None of your answers explain why england which has 55 mill people were able to count their votes faster than 2020 in usa. We had like 5 states that took 6 days, why does it take us 6 days with 5 states that are way less in population than england? But yet it took us 6 days, how do you explain it?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It used to take less than 12 hours of counting and that were the close races when we used the old-fashioned paper balloting system.

Well that's made up nonsense.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

None of your answers explain why england which has 55 mill people were able to count their votes faster than 2020 in usa

My answer explains precisely that. As did another poster.

Naturally, you ignored both answers.

 

[emilseine]

You anwered but it doesn't explain how England counted faster, they have mail in ballots too. Why didn't take them as long? Do you think they are better equipped with the poll ppl and counting the votes?

 

[WinterBorn]

A smaller population and they were not under a lockdown.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You anwered but it doesn't explain how England counted faster

Absolutely it does.

Many states did not have the infrastructure in place to count so many mail votes. So, many States sent vote counters home overnight, for several days.

The States that took the longest have longer verification processes and never have all the votes counted and verified within a single day, or even two.

Some States had nearly all votes counted on election night.

So the difference is due to different processes in different states. England has a universal process, not 50 different ones.

Consider it explained.

 

[WinterBorn]

2020 was the height of the epidemic, lots of absentee/mail in ballots duh...

And one fact that seems to be ignored by the Big Lie fans, at least in Georgia the poll workers are not allowed to open the absentee ballot containers until after all the regular votes have been cast and counted.

 

[emilseine]

Well that seems about right. Do you think England has a better voting system?