How can there be any reasonable political accommodation when one side doesn't believe the other has the right to an opinion?

[scruffy]

My daughter didn't drop out of med school. She finished and is now medical-board-certified emergency medicine Physican in two states. I asked her. She isn't a cardiologist, but heart attacks are among the most common reasons people appear in the ER. As a baferd, she is familiar with lots of reasons for heart attacks and strokes. I doubt you know the difference between an artery and a vein.

I doubt you do either. You're not an expert because of your daughter's credentials. You're just a nasty little attack dog who thinks politics is about getting one over on the opponent. I'm getting tired of your senseless game. Grow up.

 

[BULLDOG]

I doubt you do either. You're not an expert because of your daughter's credentials. You're just a nasty little attack dog who thinks politics is about getting one over on the opponent. I'm getting tired of your senseless game. Grow up.

As I said. I asked her. DUMB ASS

 

[Billo_Really]

And provided zero medical evidence for it.

He is a medical expert.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

He is a medical expert.

Great. He still provided no medical evidence for it. An expert would have been able to do so.

 

[BULLDOG]

Great. He still provided no medical evidence for it. An expert would have been able to do so.

His expert testimony is evidence dumb ass.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

His expert testimony is evidence dumb ass.

No it isn't. Expert witnesses have to provide evidence to support their testimony.

 

[BULLDOG]

No it isn't. Expert witnesses have to provide evidence to support their testimony.

They often describe what they based their opinion on in court, but a previously qualified expert's opinion is considered evidence in itself.

 

[Billo_Really]

Great. He still provided no medical evidence for it. An expert would have been able to do so.

His medical opinion isn't evidence?

 

[LeroyDumonde]

His medical opinion isn't evidence?

If an expert gives testimony in court he needs to back up his opinion with facts.

 

[Foxfyre]

There are countless examples of the left trying to stop right leaning events such as marches, symposiums, round tables, and other gatherings. This is just the latest.

AMERICA IS Under Siege : The same day that Trump was nearly assas...

There is a difference between protesting/counter protesting and trying to stop an event from happening as well as trying to assault those at the event you want to counter protest. Until the left gets it through their heads that we have a right to our views, no resolution to the current civility problem is possible.

One of the very first goals of Marxism is to control the message which they do by infiltrating and controlling what the media, entertainment, education, scientific institutions, big business, even religious organizations are allowed to say and suppress any contrary message. As much and as fast as they dare, they are demonizing and criminalizing speech that could interfere with their larger agenda.

We for the most part no longer have a free and open press but have mostly propaganda machines putting out whatever message they are ordered to put out however dishonest and/or harmful it might be.

 

[john doe 101]

One day, J6, vs. years of stopping people from expressing themselves.

The left CONSTANTLY does this shit. We've been dealing with months of it over Israel.

Again, one day vs hundreds of days at thousands of locations.

I'm at you miss.

You poor victim.

 

[martybegan]

One of the very first goals of Marxism is to control the message which they do by infiltrating and controlling what the media, entertainment, education, scientific institutions, big business, even religious organizations are allowed to say and suppress any contrary message. As much and as fast as they are, they are demonizing and criminalizing speech that could interfere with their larger agenda.

We for the most part no longer have a free and open press but have mostly propaganda machines putting out whatever message they are ordered to put out however dishonest and/or harmful it might be.

It's free, it's just dominated by one side, at least the legacy media is.

The government doesn't have to tell it what to do, it does it freely and willingly.

 

[john doe 101]

Yet you linked to none of them

ANTIFA ... isn’t a political ideology or party.

Unite the Right? That’s you.

ANTIFA doesnt even exist.

 

[martybegan]

You poor victim.

You useless twat.

 

[martybegan]

ANTIFA doesnt even exist.

It does. It's a loose organization of like minded groups of hard leftists.

 

[john doe 101]

You useless twat.

Who is stopping you from expressing yourself?

 

[john doe 101]

It does. It's a loose organization of like minded groups of hard leftists.

Who is the leader?

 

[martybegan]

Who is stopping you from expressing yourself?

Read the links I provided. It's about people being assaulted and forced to cancel events. or being shouted over when trying to speak.

 

[martybegan]

Who is the leader?

It doesn't have one, hence the inherent benefit of a cellular lose organization.

Stop saying it doesn't exist. That is a lie.

Rose City Antifa - Wikipedia

 

[Foxfyre]

It's free, it's just dominated by one side, at least the legacy media is.

The government doesn't have to tell it what to do, it does it freely and willingly.

Don't kid yourself. The government is heavily involved in what the media 'freely and willingly' reports and/or doesn't report. Otherwise you wouldn't have them all in unison using the exact same dog whistles, phrases, code words, metaphors, etc. in any given news cycle.