Sarah G
Yes and I do have a problem with that. If you want to send your child to a Christian school, pay for it yourself. That's "you" in a general sense.
Why? Why should I have to pay any less to send my child to an atheist school than the person down the street does to send their child to a catholic school? There is no reason a religious school should be exempt from a voucher program. A school is a school weather or not you have an extra religious class or not. As long as it is capable of meeting education requirements it should be allowed to take any vouchers allowed to a non religious equivalent.
Dude
Make it the responsibility of the state and communities to find ways to educate the indigent.
Turning schooling into a welfare program for the middle class has proven to be a bust and it's high time to junk the current top-down model.
Bullshit. We are where we are today because we have made it an issue to educate EVERYONE. We are not slipping because we have educated people, we are slipping because others are getting it and have started to educate their people MORE.
blu
or private schools with gov backed vouchers for people that can't afford it. the dept of education controlled schools are a joke and waste of time for people attending them
Also bullshit. SOME public schools fall into this and others do not. There are some very good public schools, you just have to find them.
sboyle
A smart kid does fine in a public school. It is the less gifted individuals who need the discipline of a private school. Sorry I misunderstood your point lol
WTF? The problem is you have a different definition of ‘fine.’ Fine to me does NOT mean they managed to get a diploma with a decent GPA. Fine is measured in the knowledge gained by the student and the challenges that were presented and overcome by the same. Intelligent individuals get nothing from a bad school.
The thing is there are 2 ways to approach the voucher issue. There is the transfer of students and the money that they bring from one public school to another OR the transfer of the same to ANY school.
The first is an absolute no brainer. There is absolutely NO reason that a parent should not be able to take their child from a crap public school and move them to a better public school as long as they are able to get the there. This accomplishes two major game changes. For one, parent have a much greater ability to influence a schools teaching ability as students will no longer be forced to pay for a local school whether or not the curriculum is sufficient. If you are a crap school then you will lose students and the money those students get for their education will be transferred to a school that IS able to give them a real education. This in of itself is a HUGE point. Of course teachers unions are completely against this as it would then require that teaches actually do their job.
Another benefit is parents will have greater control and interest where their children are attending school. While this is similar to the above point, it is a major plus. This give parents much more power and options over their children’s educational opportunities and has virtually no ramifications. I live in a not so great school district and without a voucher system I do not have the ability to send my child to an institution he needs to challenge his intelligence. It is a travesty that there are intelligent, hardworking individuals wasted because of a broken system and union interests.
The latter option I would also like to see implemented. I see no reason that you should not be able to move those funds from a public school over to a private equivalent. I do not agree that the public schools should be eliminated though. If private industry is able to compete and puts them out of business then that is another matter altogether but I doubt that will ever happen. Public school would still be ‘free’ and able to operate on a smaller budget as there are no other constituents to please and will have some benefits from being part of the state.