How are republicans going to tackle the demographic problems in general elections?

[rightwinger]

Don't you automatically know that democrats will only give advice on how to lose elections, and tell you it's how to win elections?

An independent Republican commission came to the same conclusion. With changing demographics, Republicans will no longer be able to win elections. They recommended that Republicans stop acting like such assholes, reach out to minorities and stop chasing away the vote

Hasn't worked so far

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup, so if you followed the opposite and still lose elections, you are pretty stupid, hmmm?

 

[Vox]

There are no demographic problems for Republicans. The whole whining about demography is a distraction.
The population groups discussed have been voting the same pattern for the last 50 years.

That is why the left so vehemently imposes the welfare handouts on anybody - because they know that not demography, but the state of economic dependency is what guarantees their wins.

When you draw 10% of the black vote, 30% of Hispanics and 0% of gays, you have a demographic problem

nope, you do not.

basic math is your friend

 

[rightwinger]

There are no demographic problems for Republicans. The whole whining about demography is a distraction.
The population groups discussed have been voting the same pattern for the last 50 years.

That is why the left so vehemently imposes the welfare handouts on anybody - because they know that not demography, but the state of economic dependency is what guarantees their wins.

When you draw 10% of the black vote, 30% of Hispanics and 0% of gays, you have a demographic problem

nope, you do not.

basic math is your friend

As long as old white guys can last ya

 

[Iceman]

I will tackle the problem by leaving when I get the money, I don't want to live in a third world, degenerate, corporatist police state for too much longer.

 

[candycorn]

It is not up to me to attack them.
The sane part of the Republican Party needs to grow a set of balls and drive the nutjobs out of the party. Republucans have no problem driving out someone who supports global warming, modest gun controls or reasonable tax increases. Yet those who spout anti-gay, anti-women or anti-immigrant rhetoric are tolerated

unlike the parrots in the dem party, the GOP allows all viewpoints.

No they don't

They are tolerant about hate, but won't allow discussion on taxes, environment , gays or immigration

Most of those 10 Republicans who voted with the Dems to end discrimination for the LGBT community are being fitted for bullseyes by the "all inclusive" TEA party as we speak.

"Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Mark Kirk (Ill.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Dean Heller (Nev.), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Rob Portman (Ohio), Jeff Flake (Ariz.), John McCain (Ariz.), Orrin Hatch (Utah) and Pat Toomey (Pa."

The "all inclusive" House will not vote on it...

 

[ScienceRocks]

Don't you automatically know that democrats will only give advice on how to lose elections, and tell you it's how to win elections?

An independent Republican commission came to the same conclusion. With changing demographics, Republicans will no longer be able to win elections. They recommended that Republicans stop acting like such assholes, reach out to minorities and stop chasing away the vote

Hasn't worked so far

It would be a good idea for republicans to support Obama's "amnesty"/enforcement bill. Enforce the borders, fine the businesses and grants amnesty to the ones within America.

Get this out of the way = a win for republicans. Republicans need 40% support from this community again.

 

[Iceman]

Don't you automatically know that democrats will only give advice on how to lose elections, and tell you it's how to win elections?

An independent Republican commission came to the same conclusion. With changing demographics, Republicans will no longer be able to win elections. They recommended that Republicans stop acting like such assholes, reach out to minorities and stop chasing away the vote

Hasn't worked so far

It would be a good idea for republicans to support Obama's "amnesty"/enforcement bill. Enforce the borders, fine the businesses and grants amnesty to the ones within America.

Get this out of the way = a win for republicans. Republicans need 40% support from this community again.

40% from Latinos wouldn't win them the 2016 election

Republicans need 74% of the Latino vote to win the 2016 election, neither will happen. Wasting time appealing to Latinos guarantees the Democrats another election, which is what Democrats want them to do. Democrats know, even if Republicans support Amnesty, polling shows a strong majority will still vote Democrat.
The statistics show: Passing amnesty will not move Hispanic voters into GOP column | Western Free Press

They are better off moving in a white populist direction to appeal to their white middle class/working class base. All they need is 4 more percent of the White vote.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...math-demographics-and-immigration-reform.html

 

[rightwinger]

Don't you automatically know that democrats will only give advice on how to lose elections, and tell you it's how to win elections?

An independent Republican commission came to the same conclusion. With changing demographics, Republicans will no longer be able to win elections. They recommended that Republicans stop acting like such assholes, reach out to minorities and stop chasing away the vote

Hasn't worked so far

It would be a good idea for republicans to support Obama's "amnesty"/enforcement bill. Enforce the borders, fine the businesses and grants amnesty to the ones within America.

Get this out of the way = a win for republicans. Republicans need 40% support from this community again.

What do Republicans have to lose?

For Christ sakes....it is the right thing to do

 

[rightwinger]

An independent Republican commission came to the same conclusion. With changing demographics, Republicans will no longer be able to win elections. They recommended that Republicans stop acting like such assholes, reach out to minorities and stop chasing away the vote

Hasn't worked so far

It would be a good idea for republicans to support Obama's "amnesty"/enforcement bill. Enforce the borders, fine the businesses and grants amnesty to the ones within America.

Get this out of the way = a win for republicans. Republicans need 40% support from this community again.

40% from Latinos wouldn't win them the 2016 election

Republicans need 74% of the Latino vote to win the 2016 election, neither will happen. Wasting time appealing to Latinos guarantees the Democrats another election, which is what Democrats want them to do. Democrats know, even if Republicans support Amnesty, polling shows a strong majority will still vote Democrat.
The statistics show: Passing amnesty will not move Hispanic voters into GOP column | Western Free Press

They are better off moving in a white populist direction to appeal to their white middle class/working class base. All they need is 4 more percent of the White vote.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...math-demographics-and-immigration-reform.html

Florida, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas

How many do Republicans want to give up?

 

[Iceman]

It would be a good idea for republicans to support Obama's "amnesty"/enforcement bill. Enforce the borders, fine the businesses and grants amnesty to the ones within America.

Get this out of the way = a win for republicans. Republicans need 40% support from this community again.

40% from Latinos wouldn't win them the 2016 election

Republicans need 74% of the Latino vote to win the 2016 election, neither will happen. Wasting time appealing to Latinos guarantees the Democrats another election, which is what Democrats want them to do. Democrats know, even if Republicans support Amnesty, polling shows a strong majority will still vote Democrat.
The statistics show: Passing amnesty will not move Hispanic voters into GOP column | Western Free Press

They are better off moving in a white populist direction to appeal to their white middle class/working class base. All they need is 4 more percent of the White vote.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...math-demographics-and-immigration-reform.html

Florida, Arizona, New Mexico, Florida, Texas

How many do Republicans want to give up?

I'm just giving you the reality of the situation. In reality, the Latino vote is irrelevant; it wont swing elections and is a solid democrat constituency. The White vote does swing elections and republicans only need 4-5% of it for the foreseeable future(20 years), to win elections.

The GOP needs a Southern Strategy Version 2.0. Where's Atwater when you need him?

 

[rightwinger]

40% from Latinos wouldn't win them the 2016 election

Republicans need 74% of the Latino vote to win the 2016 election, neither will happen. Wasting time appealing to Latinos guarantees the Democrats another election, which is what Democrats want them to do. Democrats know, even if Republicans support Amnesty, polling shows a strong majority will still vote Democrat.
The statistics show: Passing amnesty will not move Hispanic voters into GOP column | Western Free Press

They are better off moving in a white populist direction to appeal to their white middle class/working class base. All they need is 4 more percent of the White vote.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...math-demographics-and-immigration-reform.html

Florida, Arizona, New Mexico, Florida, Texas

How many do Republicans want to give up?

I'm just giving you the reality of the situation. In reality, the Latino vote is irrelevant; it wont swing elections and is a solid democrat constituency. The White vote does swing elections and republicans only need 4-5% of it for the foreseeable future(20 years), to win elections.

The GOP needs a Southern Strategy Version 2.0. Where's Atwater when you need him?

Our elections are decided by eight swing states

Republicans lose Florida and they never get the WhiteHouse again

 

[Iceman]

Florida, Arizona, New Mexico, Florida, Texas

How many do Republicans want to give up?

I'm just giving you the reality of the situation. In reality, the Latino vote is irrelevant; it wont swing elections and is a solid democrat constituency. The White vote does swing elections and republicans only need 4-5% of it for the foreseeable future(20 years), to win elections.

The GOP needs a Southern Strategy Version 2.0. Where's Atwater when you need him?

Our elections are decided by eight swing states

Republicans lose Florida and they never get the WhiteHouse again

So there are no Whites in Florida? So do you bother reading my links, or do you always just talk out of your ass?

 

[rightwinger]

I'm just giving you the reality of the situation. In reality, the Latino vote is irrelevant; it wont swing elections and is a solid democrat constituency. The White vote does swing elections and republicans only need 4-5% of it for the foreseeable future(20 years), to win elections.

The GOP needs a Southern Strategy Version 2.0. Where's Atwater when you need him?

Our elections are decided by eight swing states

Republicans lose Florida and they never get the WhiteHouse again

So there are no Whites in Florida? So do you bother reading my links, or do you always just talk out of your ass?

What makes you worth reading?

 

[Iceman]

Our elections are decided by eight swing states

Republicans lose Florida and they never get the WhiteHouse again

So there are no Whites in Florida? So do you bother reading my links, or do you always just talk out of your ass?

What makes you worth reading?

Well, you are reading me instead of the links I post from others, you tell me.

 

[Old Rocks]

I will tackle the problem by leaving when I get the money, I don't want to live in a third world, degenerate, corporatist police state for too much longer.

Don't let the door hit you in the ass.

 

[Iceman]

I will tackle the problem by leaving when I get the money, I don't want to live in a third world, degenerate, corporatist police state for too much longer.

Don't let the door hit you in the ass.

Oh, I won't. As soon as I get the money(which may take more than a few years in this declining economy), I will.

 

[JakeStarkey]

An independent Republican commission came to the same conclusion. With changing demographics, Republicans will no longer be able to win elections. They recommended that Republicans stop acting like such assholes, reach out to minorities and stop chasing away the vote

Hasn't worked so far

It would be a good idea for republicans to support Obama's "amnesty"/enforcement bill. Enforce the borders, fine the businesses and grants amnesty to the ones within America.

Get this out of the way = a win for republicans. Republicans need 40% support from this community again.

40% from Latinos wouldn't win them the 2016 election

Republicans need 74% of the Latino vote to win the 2016 election, neither will happen. Wasting time appealing to Latinos guarantees the Democrats another election, which is what Democrats want them to do. Democrats know, even if Republicans support Amnesty, polling shows a strong majority will still vote Democrat.
The statistics show: Passing amnesty will not move Hispanic voters into GOP column | Western Free Press

They are better off moving in a white populist direction to appeal to their white middle class/working class base. All they need is 4 more percent of the White vote.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...math-demographics-and-immigration-reform.html

The white populist position can't carry enough of that white vote, who want nothing to do with white supremacist nationalists.

 

[Iceman]

It would be a good idea for republicans to support Obama's "amnesty"/enforcement bill. Enforce the borders, fine the businesses and grants amnesty to the ones within America.

Get this out of the way = a win for republicans. Republicans need 40% support from this community again.

40% from Latinos wouldn't win them the 2016 election

Republicans need 74% of the Latino vote to win the 2016 election, neither will happen. Wasting time appealing to Latinos guarantees the Democrats another election, which is what Democrats want them to do. Democrats know, even if Republicans support Amnesty, polling shows a strong majority will still vote Democrat.
The statistics show: Passing amnesty will not move Hispanic voters into GOP column | Western Free Press

They are better off moving in a white populist direction to appeal to their white middle class/working class base. All they need is 4 more percent of the White vote.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...math-demographics-and-immigration-reform.html

The white populist position can't carry enough of that white vote, who want nothing to do with white supremacist nationalists.

Most Americans want a non-interventionist foreign policy, repeal of free trade, oppose bailouts, want lower middle class taxes, no amnesty, and less immigration, among other things. These aren't White Supremacist positions, this is what most people want, but their interests aren't represented in Washington.

And representing your core constituency is not racist, it is reasonable and should be the norm, increasing your share of the vote to win elections isn't racist, it is rational.

 

[Toro]

40% from Latinos wouldn't win them the 2016 election

Republicans need 74% of the Latino vote to win the 2016 election, neither will happen. Wasting time appealing to Latinos guarantees the Democrats another election, which is what Democrats want them to do. Democrats know, even if Republicans support Amnesty, polling shows a strong majority will still vote Democrat.
The statistics show: Passing amnesty will not move Hispanic voters into GOP column | Western Free Press

They are better off moving in a white populist direction to appeal to their white middle class/working class base. All they need is 4 more percent of the White vote.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...math-demographics-and-immigration-reform.html

The white populist position can't carry enough of that white vote, who want nothing to do with white supremacist nationalists.

Most Americans want a non-interventionist foreign policy, repeal of free trade, oppose bailouts, want lower middle class taxes, no amnesty, and less immigration, among other things. These aren't White Supremacist positions, this is what most people want, but their interests aren't represented in Washington.

And representing your core constituency is not racist, it is reasonable and should be the norm, increasing your share of the vote to win elections isn't racist, it is rational.

Americans generally support free trade.

You can't have freedom without free trade.