How are republicans going to tackle the demographic problems in general elections?

[JakeStarkey]

The white nationalists do not want freedom is the point.

 

[Iceman]

The white nationalists do not want freedom is the point.

Yes we do, we believe in sovereignty and self determination for our people and all peoples.

 

[rdean]

This is question they should be asking themselves.

Undercut Dem subsidies on tacos to illegals.

More rubbers to negro men

Later abortions to negro women

More favorable notes in chinese fortune cookies

Allahu akbar on all stop signs

EBT bonus program for cracker libtards

Almost forgot...free booze at Redskins games

Because only "Negroes" have babies out of wedlock. Ask Bristol.

 

[FA_Q2]

I'm just giving you the reality of the situation. In reality, the Latino vote is irrelevant; it wont swing elections and is a solid democrat constituency. The White vote does swing elections and republicans only need 4-5% of it for the foreseeable future(20 years), to win elections.

The GOP needs a Southern Strategy Version 2.0. Where's Atwater when you need him?

Our elections are decided by eight swing states

Republicans lose Florida and they never get the WhiteHouse again

So there are no Whites in Florida? So do you bother reading my links, or do you always just talk out of your ass?

This is TM. Do you REALLY need an answer to that question

 

[FA_Q2]

The white populist position can't carry enough of that white vote, who want nothing to do with white supremacist nationalists.

Most Americans want a non-interventionist foreign policy, repeal of free trade, oppose bailouts, want lower middle class taxes, no amnesty, and less immigration, among other things. These aren't White Supremacist positions, this is what most people want, but their interests aren't represented in Washington.

And representing your core constituency is not racist, it is reasonable and should be the norm, increasing your share of the vote to win elections isn't racist, it is rational.

Americans generally support free trade.

You can't have freedom without free trade.

Yes, actually you can. What you cannot have is freedom in a world where you have open and free trade agreements with nations who have slave labor and no EPA, FDA etc. regulating local manufacturing into the ground.

Sure, free trade sounds nice when the world plays on a levelish field and moving product costs cash but that cost and level field are diminishing VERY quickly.

 

[The Rabbi]

Most Americans want a non-interventionist foreign policy, repeal of free trade, oppose bailouts, want lower middle class taxes, no amnesty, and less immigration, among other things. These aren't White Supremacist positions, this is what most people want, but their interests aren't represented in Washington.

And representing your core constituency is not racist, it is reasonable and should be the norm, increasing your share of the vote to win elections isn't racist, it is rational.

Americans generally support free trade.

You can't have freedom without free trade.

Yes, actually you can. What you cannot have is freedom in a world where you have open and free trade agreements with nations who have slave labor and no EPA, FDA etc. regulating local manufacturing into the ground.

Sure, free trade sounds nice when the world plays on a levelish field and moving product costs cash but that cost and level field are diminishing VERY quickly.

Nonsense.

 

[JakeStarkey]

"that cost and level field are diminishing VERY quickly." remains unsupported by any evidence.

 

[The Rabbi]

"that cost and level field are diminishing VERY quickly." remains unsupported by any evidence.

Thus sayeth Jake, King og the Unsubstantiated Statement.

 

[FA_Q2]

"that cost and level field are diminishing VERY quickly." remains unsupported by any evidence.

Thus sayeth Jake, King og the Unsubstantiated Statement.

But then you go on to state:

Americans generally support free trade.

You can't have freedom without free trade.

Yes, actually you can. What you cannot have is freedom in a world where you have open and free trade agreements with nations who have slave labor and no EPA, FDA etc. regulating local manufacturing into the ground.

Sure, free trade sounds nice when the world plays on a levelish field and moving product costs cash but that cost and level field are diminishing VERY quickly.

Nonsense.

….
That would be an unsubstantiated comment

It is not nonsense – the founders even understood this. It used to be the way that we funded our government. Other nations do not have an inherent right to trade here. We, on the other hand, have a right to set certain conditions on them if they do – like trade tariffs.