House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

Why do you think they deserve to have their voices silenced?
I wasn't aware anyone was silenced.

I'm smart enough to point out your repeated lies.
And you've failed miserably at that also. Nothing to point to, except your depravity.

You want to deprive Americans of their constitutional rights.
Like trying to get Trump off Blue state primary ballots?
Ginning up charges, tailoring law to suit?
That what you mean?

It's called connect the dots.
I think thats state sanctioned propaganda.
 
I wasn't aware anyone was silenced.


And you've failed miserably at that also. Nothing to point to, except your depravity.


Like trying to get Trump off Blue state primary ballots?
Ginning up charges, tailoring law to suit?
That what you mean?


I think thats state sanctioned propaganda.
i-93bZTVh-M.jpg
 
Not valid if they're not certified. There's a reason we have rules in this country moroner. Get used to it, the adults are in charge now.
The votes are perfectly valid, the issue was with the tabulation.

So why can’t you recount them?

We both know you don’t want them counted, which is what makes you a terrible person.
 
The votes are perfectly valid, the issue was with the tabulation.

So why can’t you recount them?

We both know you don’t want them counted, which is what makes you a terrible person.
Fraud.
It's what Democrats do.
 
It is so obvious the fix was in.

Lefties, why lie about this?

What is in it for YOU to lie?
The only "fix" that was in play was put in place by Trump's MAGA lackeys on SCOTUS who granted Trump, one of the most undeserved criminals of the past 100 years, immunity.
 
Marener Jack Smith has integrity. You don’t.

Lying doesn’t give anyone integrity, you’re with him now
 
The votes are perfectly valid, the issue was with the tabulation.

So why can’t you recount them?

We both know you don’t want them counted, which is what makes you a terrible person.
What is it about "not valid if they're not certified" don't you understand? You can't just break the rules just because the person you wanted didn't win. Our democracy is very fragile moroner. Do better
 

When I got the Oregon Driver's license, I had to show them my birth certificate and also got the star on the license for air travel. At that time the DMV registered me as Republican.
 
I wasn't aware anyone was silenced.
Trump wanted them silenced. That’s fine with you.
And you've failed miserably at that also. Nothing to point to, except your depravity.
You half heartedly defend it, then when that fails you move onto something else. We were just discussing the Eastman memo which outlined their plan to silence American’s votes. You lied by claiming it was contingent on winning some lawsuit, but as we saw, the plan has nothing to do with winning a lawsuit.

After that you just pivoted to “he wasn’t found guilty” as if that proves anything.
Like trying to get Trump off Blue state primary ballots?
A legal process, adjudicated in court before the election. Is there a problem?
Ginning up charges, tailoring law to suit?
That what you mean?
The charges were perfectly legitimate. You haven’t put forth any valid argument otherwise.
 
What is it about "not valid if they're not certified" don't you understand? You can't just break the rules just because the person you wanted didn't win. Our democracy is very fragile moroner. Do better
You don’t know what you’re talking about.

It’s very fragile because of dipshits like you. Democracy depends on an informed electorate. Not brain dead cultists.
 
When did Al Gore get indicted for trying to overturn the election?
Hold up now, I think he actually won that, but Jeb! threw it to his brother.
That election was hella tainted.
I think America was fucked either way by the uniparty in 2000.
It was either global warming Gore, or global warming Islam is peace Bush.
Both were total asshats.
 
15th post
You don’t know what you’re talking about.

It’s very fragile because of dipshits like you. Democracy depends on an informed electorate. Not brain dead cultists.
The rules are the rules for a reason moroner. You can't just pick some that you like and discard others that you don't. That's not how our democracy works, get with the program
 
A legal process, adjudicated in court before the election.
What was the DNCs reasoning for the lawsuits?
We were just discussing the Eastman memo which outlined their plan to silence American’s votes. You lied by claiming it was contingent on winning some lawsuit, but as we saw, the plan has nothing to do with winning a lawsuit.
Quite clear why contingent electors were required.
Discussing the Eastman memo that you had no clue about and begged me to show quotes from, which embarrassed you and caught you in several lies....:biggrin:
The charges were perfectly legitimate.
Which charges? You clowns failed so miserably on that.

Who's posting for you now?
 
The only "fix" that was in play was put in place by Trump's MAGA lackeys on SCOTUS who granted Trump, one of the most undeserved criminals of the past 100 years, immunity.
Good thing they did that, keeps Obama from going down for wacking several Americans.
 
The rules are the rules for a reason moroner. You can't just pick some that you like and discard others that you don't. That's not how our democracy works, get with the program
You can’t just ditch votes because you don’t like who they voted for.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom