House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

"Jack Smith’s Twisted, Machiavellian Lawfare Mindset Paints a Dystopian Future for the USA if not Dispatched Quickly
January 1, 2026 | Sundance | 19 Comments


I don’t care if you support Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis or the Easter Bunny, any American who doesn’t realize the tenuous future of our union after reviewing the information within this testimony is going to forever live in a collapsed dystopian nightmare, if they vote for any political representative who support it.


The House Judiciary Committee has released the [VIDEO] and [TRANSCRIPT] of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition. What is outlined within it is alarming in the extreme. I strongly urge anyone with any platform to review the details and quickly highlight the content therein. There is no time to waste.

Jack Smith appeared before the committee with three personal lawyers to support him. The content of the deposition is chilling in the extreme. While many will focus on the granular details of the testimony, I wish to highlight one of the more alarming aspects to the bigger picture."







Smith's political witch hunt against Trump on behalf of Joe Biden was shut down by the voters. Now, Jack Smith gets to testify under oath and the ballots in Fulton co GA will eventually be examined by the DOJ. This is the will of the American People.

Right-wing screed.

It's clear why the Trump toadies would not allow a public hearing.

Smith makes it clear the evidence against the degenerate is damning.
 
How did trump affect government function?

Even smith said there was no evidence that trump caused J6 rioters
Trump lied to his goons about the election. That incited them to attack outnumbered police protecting democracy and the Capitol for hours as the degenerate watched and did nothing to stop them, despite the pleas of aides, advisers, media handlers, family members, and others.
 
Yes, it's called the OP article. :popcorn:

Here's a clip:


The degenerate's petty vendetta sprees are fizzling, but this one backfired bigly.
Trump's toadies were impotent in their attempt to concoct anything to indict the special counsel.


Smith used the day-long grilling before the House Judiciary Committee to mount a robust defense of his investigation into Trump for seeking to subvert the 2020 election. He forcefully rebutted claims that his work was tainted by politics and delivered a granular defense of his office’s tactics and prosecution strategy — all while repeatedly restating his view that Trump was guilty of a historic crime...
Smith repeatedly drew on diehard Republicans to make the case against the man they wanted to become president but who they acknowledged had been defeated.
Trumpwanks will whine, but they know that all those Republican witnesses nailed the pissy old geezer, as Smith reminded everyone.
 
Last edited:
Be interesting if Biden was found to have cooked the election and lost the elector votes. Then what?

Oh.... we'll vote for Trump then.....:ack-1:

It’s been 5 years since the 2020 election and NOTHING has been found to support any of Trump’s claims.

The law suits against FOX News produced evidence that everyone at FOX knew Trump’s claims were completely without merit or proof but deliberately broadcast lies because their viewers refused to believe Trump lost.

The entire WORLD knows Trump lost in 2020, except his Cult.
 
It’s been 5 years since the 2020 election and NOTHING has been found to support any of Trump’s claims.

The law suits against FOX News produced evidence that everyone at FOX knew Trump’s claims were completely without merit or proof but deliberately broadcast lies because their viewers refused to believe Trump lost.

The entire WORLD knows Trump lost in 2020, except his Cult.
To pretend that there has been a vast, nationwide conspiracy to falsify a national election that has been certified by every state (following numerous recounts, investigations, audits, court challenges, etc.) and not a single conspiracist identified, no explanation of how or where the caper was achieved, that classified documents were not illegally held, concealed, and lied about after they were located, documented and recovered, after officeholders were pressured to falsify vote totals, following fake elector schemes that also fizzled, etc., irrefutable documentation of the loser's goons attacking police while the loser watched for hours. It is ludicrous.

Jack Smith's being targeted for yet another spiteful farce backfired bigly. He acquitted himself with integrity and distinction, There is nothing with which to charge him.

The toadies exposed themselves, and the cult is enraged.
 
Well....Hillary didn't start complaining about the results of the election until months later when the whole Russian interference stuff came out. She lost, conceded, and then went hiking. Trump could have whined and brayed about a "stolen" election to his hearts content....if only it had stopped with him being unable to shut his pie holr.

But no, he had to call Raffensperger up and ask to find "just 20,000 votes, Brad". And then whipped up a riot at the Capitol on 1/6/2025 to get the results of the election overturned.

THAT'S fraud. THAT'S what Jack Smith was going to hang him on.
And Trump, did all that to himself.
He should be sitting in prison right now. Not the White House.

Hillary complained about the election for …2 years.

For those who haven’t done so, I recommend going and reading the transcript of the Raffensperger call, it’s nothing like what the media told you. Trump never told anyone to find any votes, and certainly didn’t tell anyone to fabricate any votes.
 
Inconsequential. The votes were recounted twice, including a hand recount with the same result each time.

Again, being delusional is not a valid defense. There was no real evidence of fraud. Just their delusional thinking.

Yes, they recounted the ballots and verified them each time against a tabulator tape that wasn’t accurate.
 
Trump’s claims were false. He wasn’t laying out what he found, he was lying to Raffensperger in an attempt to get him to “recalculate” the vote totals and make Trump win.

That’s fraud.

Not sure what you mean by “apparently not” because after two recounts the vote total didn’t change which makes it inconsequential.

Prove he knew at the time it was false.

Read the transcript. At no point did trump tell Brad to create votes. He was only ever trying to the Georgia to look into all of the things they said were wrong.
 
Trump lied to his goons about the election. That incited them to attack outnumbered police protecting democracy and the Capitol for hours as the degenerate watched and did nothing to stop them, despite the pleas of aides, advisers, media handlers, family members, and others.

There is no proof he lied, he was going off what he believed at the time.

However, even if he did lie, that’s not a crime.

He did do something, he told pelosi to bring in the national guard, which she admits fault on.

I agree that trump didn’t act appropriately that day, but we’re looking at what was a crime, which what trump did wasn’t illegal, just petty and selfish.

You want to look at HIS speeches as incitement, but you won’t do the same thing for anything someone from the left says.
 
The degenerate's petty vendetta sprees are fizzling, but this one backfired bigly.
Trump's toadies were impotent in their attempt to concoct anything to indict the special counsel.


Smith used the day-long grilling before the House Judiciary Committee to mount a robust defense of his investigation into Trump for seeking to subvert the 2020 election. He forcefully rebutted claims that his work was tainted by politics and delivered a granular defense of his office’s tactics and prosecution strategy — all while repeatedly restating his view that Trump was guilty of a historic crime...
Smith repeatedly drew on diehard Republicans to make the case against the man they wanted to become president but who they acknowledged had been defeated.
Trumpwanks will whine, but they know that all those Republican witnesses nailed the pissy old geezer, as Smith reminded everyone.

I don't agree with you, so you must be a criminal committing fraud.
 
Hold up now, I think he actually won that, but Jeb! threw it to his brother.
That election was hella tainted.
I think America was fucked either way by the uniparty in 2000.
It was either global warming Gore, or global warming Islam is peace Bush.
Both were total asshats.

Regardless, Al Gore wasn't prosecuted for trying to overturn that election result.
 
Hillary complained about the election for …2 years.

For those who haven’t done so, I recommend going and reading the transcript of the Raffensperger call, it’s nothing like what the media told you. Trump never told anyone to find any votes, and certainly didn’t tell anyone to fabricate any votes.

Try listening to the actual phone call because Trump most definitely did tell Raffensberger to find him votes. As for the fake electors, forged documents were submitted to the NA.

Stop lying and deluding yourself. No one with an IQ above 60 believes you.

Hillary didn’t try to overthrow the government, send a mob to stop the transition of power or submit fake electors to Congress.

She didn’t do anything illegal. BIG difference.
 
15th post
Prove he knew at the time it was false.

Read the transcript. At no point did trump tell Brad to create votes. He was only ever trying to the Georgia to look into all of the things they said were wrong.
Find=create
 
If there were credible evidence of wrong-doing by Smith - or any of the many Republicans who testified under oath attesting to Trump's criminal behavior - they would demand Trump's Department of Partisan War (formerly the Department of Justice) must indict those individuals.

The stickler that prevents Trump toadies actually bringing charges is that credible evidence is required under our system of jurisprudence, so they are forced to resort to the vapid bluster of their hyperbolic revilements.

Screen Shot 2026-01-03 at 9.52.12 AM.webp
 
westwall said:

This lack of an intelligent response means,


Screen Shot 2026-01-03 at 10.37.30 AM.webp

"I am unable to honestly refute what
you have said, but I don't like it!"
 
Back
Top Bottom