House Democrats Object to Targeting Gang Members for Deportation, Alleging Racism

Actually, no they didn't. In interviews conducted by Fox News reporters that I witnessed on live TV,
Immigrants waiting on the other side blamed their exodus from countries on violent crime and squalor. Most of them never heard of Biden. The problem is that you trump-a-dumps are so dishonest and uninformed that you are trying to make a political issue out of a humanitarian effort, as clumsy as it is.
As tempting as it is for some people that have no skin in this game the United States of America cannot
be the flop house and soup kitchen for the world.

We already have a legal and well ordered way to take in a number of cases on humanitarian grounds
and when you overfill a life boat the boat capsizes and then everyone dies.

Where were all these people the last four years? Obviously their lives are only miserably harsh and
unbearable when a leftist democrat enters the White House.
With a little bit of money many countries can induced to take in refugees.

Wring your little hanky out! The difference between living a decent life and living in the racist,
right wing Hell hole of the USA makes a great deal of difference to a lot of people.
But people don't have to live here to live decently.
 
Your argument is bunk. Dems feel that felons have the right to vote, especially if they have served their time. It has nothing to do with who they vote for, and their vote would have 0 effect on an election. My view is that convicted felons have lost their rights to just about everything, especially the vote.

Democrats are criminals, so they want other criminals to vote because they will vote for them. It's not rocket science. Just like immigrants. If they were known to vote Republican, the commies would have had a 100 foot wall on that border that was guaranteed impassible.

According to this research which took their information from 11 years ago, 3% of our total population were convicted felons, and included are the 15% of blacks who are felons. So don't tell me these people voting wouldn't change the outcome of an election.

 
Actually, no they didn't. In interviews conducted by Fox News reporters that I witnessed on live TV,
Immigrants waiting on the other side blamed their exodus from countries on violent crime and squalor. Most of them never heard of Biden. The problem is that you trump-a-dumps are so dishonest and uninformed that you are trying to make a political issue out of a humanitarian effort, as clumsy as it is.

Right. It was just dumb luck they started to flood our country after the election.

I've seen plenty of border immigrants on Fox where they clearly say they came because of Biden. But you may consider Fox a bias source. So here's another source.


And here is how they are dressed while coming here:

Unknown-1.jpeg
 
Hundreds of thousands? Gosh oh gee! The Dems put on their smuggling clothes in the morning and go out to guide the Cartel in their smuggling effort, yes? What happened to the smugglers during the Trump-a-dump years? Did they just stop and wait for Biden? Talk about a dimwit!

Are you enjoying trolling this thread?

Stop posting until you read the rules.
Are you enjoying the phony accusations on this thread?

Only yours
 
Your argument is bunk. Dems feel that felons have the right to vote, especially if they have served their time. It has nothing to do with who they vote for, and their vote would have 0 effect on an election. My view is that convicted felons have lost their rights to just about everything, especially the vote.

Democrats are criminals, so they want other criminals to vote because they will vote for them. It's not rocket science. Just like immigrants. If they were known to vote Republican, the commies would have had a 100 foot wall on that border that was guaranteed impassible.

According to this research which took their information from 11 years ago, 3% of our total population were convicted felons, and included are the 15% of blacks who are felons. So don't tell me these people voting wouldn't change the outcome of an election.

Regardless, your rhetoric is bogus as usual. let's not bring up the subject of criminals because your ilk is as criminal as it gets--Jan 6.
 
Actually, no they didn't. In interviews conducted by Fox News reporters that I witnessed on live TV,
Immigrants waiting on the other side blamed their exodus from countries on violent crime and squalor. Most of them never heard of Biden. The problem is that you trump-a-dumps are so dishonest and uninformed that you are trying to make a political issue out of a humanitarian effort, as clumsy as it is.

Right. It was just dumb luck they started to flood our country after the election.

I've seen plenty of border immigrants on Fox where they clearly say they came because of Biden. But you may consider Fox a bias source. So here's another source.


And here is how they are dressed while coming here:

View attachment 492209
Before that, they were just over the imaginary border in Mexico, awaiting their number to be called.
 
Hundreds of thousands? Gosh oh gee! The Dems put on their smuggling clothes in the morning and go out to guide the Cartel in their smuggling effort, yes? What happened to the smugglers during the Trump-a-dump years? Did they just stop and wait for Biden? Talk about a dimwit!

Are you enjoying trolling this thread?

Stop posting until you read the rules.
Are you enjoying the phony accusations on this thread?

Only yours
And what might they be?
 
Before that, they were just over the imaginary border in Mexico, awaiting their number to be called.

Some got through, they always will. But Trump's policy put pressure on Mexico to stop people from other countries entering their country to get to the US. He told them if they don't do something about their southern borders, he's going to cut US aid to Mexico. He also made the policy that if anybody does get to our border to apply for asylum and was offered asylum in another country along the way, they'd be immediately disqualified.

It worked very well, especially in 2019.
 
Before that, they were just over the imaginary border in Mexico, awaiting their number to be called.

Some got through, they always will. But Trump's policy put pressure on Mexico to stop people from other countries entering their country to get to the US. He told them if they don't do something about their southern borders, he's going to cut US aid to Mexico. He also made the policy that if anybody does get to our border to apply for asylum and was offered asylum in another country along the way, they'd be immediately disqualified.

It worked very well, especially in 2019.
It didn't really work all that well as many entered our country through other means and non-protected entrances.
 
The only people that the libs want to deport are those leaving communist shitholes like Cuba.

I still remember how they expelled Elian Gonzalez, even though the boy committed no crime at all. The idea of leaving a "workers paradise" was beyond the pale.

That was about parental rights, you moron.
 
Regardless, your rhetoric is bogus as usual. let's not bring up the subject of criminals because your ilk is as criminal as it gets--Jan 6.

Right. So when it comes to riots, what's the ratio now, like 100 to 1?
Actually no. The PO boys, white supremacists, etc know how to aggravate a situation and we will see more of them for sure. That particular riot was an insurrection to unseat our government and more loonie actions will occur due to the sheer numbers of 'em that have reared their ugly heads since Trump
gave of his support. They will find ways to be disruptive and initiate organized attacks.
 
Actually no. The PO boys, white supremacists, etc know how to aggravate a situation and we will see more of them for sure. That particular riot was an insurrection to unseat our government and more loonie actions will occur due to the sheer numbers of 'em that have reared their ugly heads since Trump
gave of his support. They will find ways to be disruptive and initiate organized attacks.

You can't lie to win an argument. It never works. Trump didn't give anybody any support. Furthermore out of the thousands of people at the Capital, only a hundred or so actually entered the building. Nobody is going to do anything to these anti-gun commies who now are surrounded with a larger military than what we have in Afghanistan. The reason they are there is when they try to try and pull off unconstitutional laws against us, or do something commie like expand the court so they have control, or make DC and PR states for political power. That's what they're scared of.
 
It didn't really work all that well as many entered our country through other means and non-protected entrances.

Bullshit.



 
Actually no. The PO boys, white supremacists, etc know how to aggravate a situation and we will see more of them for sure. That particular riot was an insurrection to unseat our government and more loonie actions will occur due to the sheer numbers of 'em that have reared their ugly heads since Trump
gave of his support. They will find ways to be disruptive and initiate organized attacks.

You can't lie to win an argument. It never works. Trump didn't give anybody any support. Furthermore out of the thousands of people at the Capital, only a hundred or so actually entered the building. Nobody is going to do anything to these anti-gun commies who now are surrounded with a larger military than what we have in Afghanistan. The reason they are there is when they try to try and pull off unconstitutional laws against us, or do something commie like expand the court so they have control, or make DC and PR states for political power. That's what they're scared of.
They are so scared! Trump did give support to internal terrorists, telling them that "we love you"
and "stand back and be ready". If that isn't a small example of broader support, what is?
Do you expect anything less than an action to prevent a future insurrection attempt, or do you want it to be a fair fight?
Relative to the Supreme court, the Republicans asked for a possible expansion by not following the normal code of conduct with the selection of Justices. Don't worry. It won't happen.
 
It didn't really work all that well as many entered our country through other means and non-protected entrances.

Bullshit.



Fact, not bullshit because there were other ways to enter as we are seeing today where there is no wall.
Biden has made an effort to correct his blunder, except for the children.
 
Fact, not bullshit because there were other ways to enter as we are seeing today where there is no wall.
Biden has made an effort to correct his blunder, except for the children.

What effort is that? I fail to see any. No wall? And who's fault was that?

Pelosi-1.jpeg


Even leftist sources are forced to admit the great accomplishments of President Trump when it comes to immigration. In fact if you read the CNBC link I posted, they tried to make the case that the wall was a waste of time and money given how low our illegal border crossings were under Trump. Of course they didn't write the article with praising Trump in mind, they wrote the article to convince the sheep that Trump's wall is totally unnecessary. In order to do that, they had to admit how illegal crossings were well under control.

Thanks to Dementia, the border is once again a huge mess, with children and women getting raped along the way, a percentage of them dying during the trip here, being kidnapped for human trafficing, bringing in illegal narcotics to kill Americans with, all of which Trump stopped.

The solution to our new border problem is Donald Trump, but since we can't have him the solution is his policies that Dementia will never allow because he'd rather see hundreds of Americans die getting Covid from these migrants than he would stopping them and allowing the media to continue crediting Trump's great work.
 
They are so scared! Trump did give support to internal terrorists, telling them that "we love you"
and "stand back and be ready". If that isn't a small example of broader support, what is?
Do you expect anything less than an action to prevent a future insurrection attempt, or do you want it to be a fair fight?
Relative to the Supreme court, the Republicans asked for a possible expansion by not following the normal code of conduct with the selection of Justices. Don't worry. It won't happen.

It may not happen because polls show 80% of the country is against it, and those leftists up for reelection may vote it down. The idea that it's under consideration demonstrates the dictator mentality of the Nazi's. But if enough of them are willing to chance losing their career over it and it does pass, the majority of people will be super pissed, and that's why the solders are there over 4 1/2 months after the last event. Why do you think both Dementia and Whorris refused to answer the question of stacking the courts before the election? Because they are going to try and do it, but wouldn't tell the people about it because it would have cost them the election since most are against it.

Trump never told any terrorist group he loved them. If he did, please provide the video not out of context. As far as what Trump said, I can show you several more caustic phrases Democrats used when addressing their followers, one of which that led to rioters trying to bust down the doors of the Supreme Court while Kavanaugh was being sworn in.
 
They are so scared! Trump did give support to internal terrorists, telling them that "we love you"
and "stand back and be ready". If that isn't a small example of broader support, what is?
Do you expect anything less than an action to prevent a future insurrection attempt, or do you want it to be a fair fight?
Relative to the Supreme court, the Republicans asked for a possible expansion by not following the normal code of conduct with the selection of Justices. Don't worry. It won't happen.

It may not happen because polls show 80% of the country is against it, and those leftists up for reelection may vote it down. The idea that it's under consideration demonstrates the dictator mentality of the Nazi's. But if enough of them are willing to chance losing their career over it and it does pass, the majority of people will be super pissed, and that's why the solders are there over 4 1/2 months after the last event. Why do you think both Dementia and Whorris refused to answer the question of stacking the courts before the election? Because they are going to try and do it, but wouldn't tell the people about it because it would have cost them the election since most are against it.

Trump never told any terrorist group he loved them. If he did, please provide the video not out of context. As far as what Trump said, I can show you several more caustic phrases Democrats used when addressing their followers, one of which that led to rioters trying to bust down the doors of the Supreme Court while Kavanaugh was being sworn in.

Donald Trump Tells Capitol Rioters 'Go Home' but 'We Love You'

https://people.com › Politics

Jan 6, 2021 — In contrast to Trump's tone, Vice President Mike Pence tweeted that "this attack on our Capitol will not be tolerated and those involved will be ...
 
Donald Trump Tells Capitol Rioters 'Go Home' but 'We Love You'

Trump was not addressing the rioters. WTF does it say that in the video or Tweet? He was addressing the other thousands of PROTESTERS that did not riot.

What did I tell you about trying to win a debate with lies?
 

Forum List

Back
Top