Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A House Democrat said Wednesday that it "really bothers me" when people claim the U.S. Constitution was designed to limit the federal government's power.
At a Wednesday House Judiciary Committee hearing focusing on whether Congress should consider impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the founding document of the U.S. was designed for the "opposite" purpose.
House Dem: Constitution was designed to increase government power
Yes, this assclown actually said this.
A House Democrat said Wednesday that it "really bothers me" when people claim the U.S. Constitution was designed to limit the federal government's power.
At a Wednesday House Judiciary Committee hearing focusing on whether Congress should consider impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the founding document of the U.S. was designed for the "opposite" purpose.
House Dem: Constitution was designed to increase government power
I'm not surprised he believes this. He's an extremist far left nut job. I'm surprised he actually stated it publicly.
Could America have survived if the framers had not given the central government more power than the Articles?Yes, this assclown actually said this.
A House Democrat said Wednesday that it "really bothers me" when people claim the U.S. Constitution was designed to limit the federal government's power.
At a Wednesday House Judiciary Committee hearing focusing on whether Congress should consider impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the founding document of the U.S. was designed for the "opposite" purpose.
House Dem: Constitution was designed to increase government power
I'm not surprised he believes this. He's an extremist far left nut job. I'm surprised he actually stated it publicly.
Damn it. Technically speaking, COMPARED TO THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION, he is correct.
Under the articles the central government was unable to function effectively.
The constitution was written to increase the power of the federal government relative to that.
BUT, the concept of limitations and separations of powers, was NOT ABANDONED, just moderated.
It always amazes me to hear leftists trying to talk law and constitution. They have absolutely no sense of history.
Could America have survived if the framers had not given the central government more power than the Articles?Yes, this assclown actually said this.
A House Democrat said Wednesday that it "really bothers me" when people claim the U.S. Constitution was designed to limit the federal government's power.
At a Wednesday House Judiciary Committee hearing focusing on whether Congress should consider impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the founding document of the U.S. was designed for the "opposite" purpose.
House Dem: Constitution was designed to increase government power
I'm not surprised he believes this. He's an extremist far left nut job. I'm surprised he actually stated it publicly.
Damn it. Technically speaking, COMPARED TO THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION, he is correct.
Under the articles the central government was unable to function effectively.
The constitution was written to increase the power of the federal government relative to that.
BUT, the concept of limitations and separations of powers, was NOT ABANDONED, just moderated.
Actually, he is correct in sayingYes, this assclown actually said this.
A House Democrat said Wednesday that it "really bothers me" when people claim the U.S. Constitution was designed to limit the federal government's power.
At a Wednesday House Judiciary Committee hearing focusing on whether Congress should consider impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the founding document of the U.S. was designed for the "opposite" purpose.
House Dem: Constitution was designed to increase government power
I'm not surprised he believes this. He's an extremist far left nut job. I'm surprised he actually stated it publicly.
Actually, he is correct in sayingYes, this assclown actually said this.
A House Democrat said Wednesday that it "really bothers me" when people claim the U.S. Constitution was designed to limit the federal government's power.
At a Wednesday House Judiciary Committee hearing focusing on whether Congress should consider impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the founding document of the U.S. was designed for the "opposite" purpose.
House Dem: Constitution was designed to increase government power
I'm not surprised he believes this. He's an extremist far left nut job. I'm surprised he actually stated it publicly.
"The Constitution was enacted to strengthen government power to enable central government to lay taxes and to function effectively. We put limits on that through the Bill of Rights, but the Constitution was enacted for the opposite purpose," said Nadler.
They're all stating it publicly anymore. Like those idiots who claim that people who read/discuss the Constitution are "ignorant" because, apparently, the Constitution isn't really supposed to be followed, read or discussed. To do these things or imply these things is *stupid*. They claim a LIVING document (which means the words mean nothing) and therefore we should NOT read it, and instead accept whatever *interpretation* our statist masters choose to attach to it.Yes, this assclown actually said this.
A House Democrat said Wednesday that it "really bothers me" when people claim the U.S. Constitution was designed to limit the federal government's power.
At a Wednesday House Judiciary Committee hearing focusing on whether Congress should consider impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the founding document of the U.S. was designed for the "opposite" purpose.
House Dem: Constitution was designed to increase government power
I'm not surprised he believes this. He's an extremist far left nut job. I'm surprised he actually stated it publicly.
Yo, Socialist Democrats, they don`t believe in the Constitution, Israel, Religion, Life(abortion), ETC.!!!
"GTP"
They do believe in this:
View attachment 79036
Actually, he is correct in sayingYes, this assclown actually said this.
A House Democrat said Wednesday that it "really bothers me" when people claim the U.S. Constitution was designed to limit the federal government's power.
At a Wednesday House Judiciary Committee hearing focusing on whether Congress should consider impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the founding document of the U.S. was designed for the "opposite" purpose.
House Dem: Constitution was designed to increase government power
I'm not surprised he believes this. He's an extremist far left nut job. I'm surprised he actually stated it publicly.
"The Constitution was enacted to strengthen government power to enable central government to lay taxes and to function effectively. We put limits on that through the Bill of Rights, but the Constitution was enacted for the opposite purpose," said Nadler.
Is he wrong ? The con allows the creation of laws ect.. Song long as the votes are there and the law doesn't violate the con itself .
Yes, he's wrong.Is he wrong ? The con allows the creation of laws ect.. Song long as the votes are there and the law doesn't violate the con itself .
And yet America's top historians are accused of being leftists.It always amazes me to hear leftists trying to talk law and constitution. They have absolutely no sense of history.
?And yet America's top historians are accused of being leftists.It always amazes me to hear leftists trying to talk law and constitution. They have absolutely no sense of history.
