Homosexuality is like Cancer

Be carful, Nipper. It is contagious! If you drink out of the same beer bottle as a homosexual, you will soon have limp wrists and a collection of Richard Simmons "Sweating to the Oldies" tapes....
It is the value one places on sex that becomes shared. One may look at sex as sacred or may view it as a thrill. This is what is learned. Instead as a gift from God, it becomes something to toy with. Perverts usually leave God out of the picture entirely.

Tell it to the Puritans ya freaking psycho.

The value of sex is that it makes people feel good. You don't really learn that from the environment you're in. You learn that from trial an error.

And yeah..................sex IS a gift from the Creator....................why should you choose to say who can partake of it and who can not?
And yes, I do believe any "gift" can be abused.
BTW................I'm sure that some people on this planet (who aren't me) would say that what you do with your significant other (be it boyfriend, girlfriend or whatever) could be viewed as a toy or "perverted".

But keep up with the bigotry, at least, if it keeps you "holy".

But, I don't really think that bigotry is holy, especially after what Jesus taught.

Jesus told the harlot to go and sin no more. Does that make Jesus judgmental and a bigot?
 
Last edited:
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

This just means that this kid is gay...and hates himself.
So why glamorize homosexuality? Or is this a way to destroy American values and reduce Americans to a third world nation of sexual deviants. It would seem Russia has deeper morals than Obama.

Have you thought about moving there? Sounds like a good fit.
 
It is the value one places on sex that becomes shared. One may look at sex as sacred or may view it as a thrill. This is what is learned. Instead as a gift from God, it becomes something to toy with. Perverts usually leave God out of the picture entirely.

Tell it to the Puritans ya freaking psycho.

The value of sex is that it makes people feel good. You don't really learn that from the environment you're in. You learn that from trial an error.

And yeah..................sex IS a gift from the Creator....................why should you choose to say who can partake of it and who can not?
And yes, I do believe any "gift" can be abused.
BTW................I'm sure that some people on this planet (who aren't me) would say that what you do with your significant other (be it boyfriend, girlfriend or whatever) could be viewed as a toy or "perverted".

But keep up with the bigotry, at least, if it keeps you "holy".

But, I don't really think that bigotry is holy, especially after what Jesus taught.

Jesus told the harlot to go and sin no more. Does that make Jesus judgmental and a bigot?

Dude, if you were emulating Jesus, this thread wouldn't exist.

:lol:
 
Tell it to the Puritans ya freaking psycho.

The value of sex is that it makes people feel good. You don't really learn that from the environment you're in. You learn that from trial an error.

And yeah..................sex IS a gift from the Creator....................why should you choose to say who can partake of it and who can not?
And yes, I do believe any "gift" can be abused.
BTW................I'm sure that some people on this planet (who aren't me) would say that what you do with your significant other (be it boyfriend, girlfriend or whatever) could be viewed as a toy or "perverted".

But keep up with the bigotry, at least, if it keeps you "holy".

But, I don't really think that bigotry is holy, especially after what Jesus taught.

Jesus told the harlot to go and sin no more. Does that make Jesus judgmental and a bigot?

Dude, if you were emulating Jesus, this thread wouldn't exist.

:lol:

And if you were emulating Jesus you wouldn't be speaking out of both sides of your mouth. Jesus certainly knew when to use the word hypocrite, and wasn't afraid to use that terminology. You actually believe that a bigot is someone who disagrees with you. The truth of the matter is that bigots do not like those who disagree with them. And that sound like yourself...
 
Be carful, Nipper. It is contagious! If you drink out of the same beer bottle as a homosexual, you will soon have limp wrists and a collection of Richard Simmons "Sweating to the Oldies" tapes....
It is the value one places on sex that becomes shared. One may look at sex as sacred or may view it as a thrill. This is what is learned. Instead as a gift from God, it becomes something to toy with. Perverts usually leave God out of the picture entirely.

Snag is, homosexuals aren’t ‘perverts.’

In fact, in the United States, the majority of homosexuals are Christian, adhere to its tenets, they even marry their same-sex partner in accordance with Christian marriage rituals.

Some of the most devout Christians are gay.
Sounds like you're speaking of Roman Catholic priests. Also, there are no marriage rituals that include same sex partners. 'I now pronounce you husband and husband,' is not in any Christian book I'm aware of.
 
Christ never said a word about homosexuals. The old Testament does, but unless you are cherry picking, it also commands you to stone a person to death for gathering sticks on the sabbath.
 
Jesus told the harlot to go and sin no more. Does that make Jesus judgmental and a bigot?

Dude, if you were emulating Jesus, this thread wouldn't exist.

:lol:

And if you were emulating Jesus you wouldn't be speaking out of both sides of your mouth. Jesus certainly knew when to use the word hypocrite, and wasn't afraid to use that terminology. You actually believe that a bigot is someone who disagrees with you. The truth of the matter is that bigots do not like those who disagree with them. And that sound like yourself...

Like I said. I am not a christian. You, on the other hand, are why people are leaving the church in droves.
 
It is the value one places on sex that becomes shared. One may look at sex as sacred or may view it as a thrill. This is what is learned. Instead as a gift from God, it becomes something to toy with. Perverts usually leave God out of the picture entirely.

Snag is, homosexuals aren’t ‘perverts.’

In fact, in the United States, the majority of homosexuals are Christian, adhere to its tenets, they even marry their same-sex partner in accordance with Christian marriage rituals.

Some of the most devout Christians are gay.
Sounds like you're speaking of Roman Catholic priests. Also, there are no marriage rituals that include same sex partners. 'I now pronounce you husband and husband,' is not in any Christian book I'm aware of.

Granted................maybe there are no rituals written down in the Bible that says you can become husband and husband (or wife and wife as the case may be), but there is also no ritual in the Bible that makes a marriage out of a man and a woman. I challenge you to find me the rituals in the Bible that says anything about marriage and how the ceremony is supposed to be performed.

Interestingly enough though, there WAS a same sex union recognized in the Bible (Old Testament to be specific) where the nation of Israel recognized the union of King David and his best friend Jonathan.
 
Dude, if you were emulating Jesus, this thread wouldn't exist.

:lol:

And if you were emulating Jesus you wouldn't be speaking out of both sides of your mouth. Jesus certainly knew when to use the word hypocrite, and wasn't afraid to use that terminology. You actually believe that a bigot is someone who disagrees with you. The truth of the matter is that bigots do not like those who disagree with them. And that sound like yourself...

Like I said. I am not a christian. You, on the other hand, are why people are leaving the church in droves.

People are leaving mainline churches (the ones that promote homosexuality) for more fundamental bible churches. Those churches (the kind I attend) have actually been growing. People want to hear the truth and not "comforting" lies designed to make people feel cosey with choices they have made.
 
Snag is, homosexuals aren’t ‘perverts.’

In fact, in the United States, the majority of homosexuals are Christian, adhere to its tenets, they even marry their same-sex partner in accordance with Christian marriage rituals.

Some of the most devout Christians are gay.
Sounds like you're sphuheaking of Roman Catholic priests. Also, there are no marriage rituals that include same sex partners. 'I now pronounce you husband and husband,' is not in any Christian book I'm aware of.

Granted................maybe there are no rituals written down in the Bible that says you can become husband and husband (or wife and wife as the case may be), but there is also no ritual in the Bible that makes a marriage out of a man and a woman. I challenge you to find me the rituals in the Bible that says anything about marriage and how the ceremony is supposed to be performed.

Interestingly enough though, there WAS a same sex union recognized in the Bible (Old Testament to be specific) where the nation of Israel recognized the union of King David and his best friend Jonathan.

There has never been a problem with friendship.
 
Think they were more than friends.
A homosexual needs to think that, because some are scraping at the bottom of the barrel in order to find moral support for homosexuality. The fact is that both David and Jonathan had wives and they also had children. Love is not sex. Love doesn't need sex. Sex doesn't need love --- thought it makes the event more enjoyable.
 
Last edited:
Think they were more than friends.
A homosexual needs to think that, because some are scraping at the bottom of the barrel in order to find moral support for homosexuality. The fact is that both David and Jonathan had wives and they also had children. Love is not sex. Love doesn't need sex. Sex doesn't need love --- thought it makes the event more enjoyable.

Exactly!! Thank you.

Thank you. :D

Now maybe you can stop denying that gays fall in love and want to get married.
 
And if you were emulating Jesus you wouldn't be speaking out of both sides of your mouth. Jesus certainly knew when to use the word hypocrite, and wasn't afraid to use that terminology. You actually believe that a bigot is someone who disagrees with you. The truth of the matter is that bigots do not like those who disagree with them. And that sound like yourself...

Like I said. I am not a christian. You, on the other hand, are why people are leaving the church in droves.

People are leaving mainline churches (the ones that promote homosexuality) for more fundamental bible churches. Those churches (the kind I attend) have actually been growing. People want to hear the truth and not "comforting" lies designed to make people feel cosey with choices they have made.

Got any links to back up your statements, or is this just more bigoted b.s. from your own narrow perspective?
 
15th post
Think they were more than friends.
A homosexual needs to think that, because some are scraping at the bottom of the barrel in order to find moral support for homosexuality. The fact is that both David and Jonathan had wives and they also had children. Love is not sex. Love doesn't need sex. Sex doesn't need love --- thought it makes the event more enjoyable.

Exactly!! Thank you.

Thank you. :D

Now maybe you can stop denying that gays fall in love and want to get married.
That two men can have a love for each other does not mean that they are or should have sex with each other. And since such sex offers no blessing of babies, there are no biological reasons or spiritual reasons for such unions to be promoted nor encouraged.
 
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness....the tenets found in the Declaration of Independence....those are the unalienable rights guaranteed every American citizen, regardless of sexual orientation, gender, race, or class.
So my question is, when did you realize you were gay, and what was so disgusting about it that moved you to "self-hate"?
 
A homosexual needs to think that, because some are scraping at the bottom of the barrel in order to find moral support for homosexuality. The fact is that both David and Jonathan had wives and they also had children. Love is not sex. Love doesn't need sex. Sex doesn't need love --- thought it makes the event more enjoyable.

Exactly!! Thank you.

Thank you. :D

Now maybe you can stop denying that gays fall in love and want to get married.
That two men can have a love for each other does not mean that they are or should have sex with each other. And since such sex offers no blessing of babies, there are no biological reasons or spiritual reasons for such unions to be promoted nor encouraged.


Many hetero couples are "childless"either naturally, or by choice. Sex can be the most profound expression of love, or it can be "just a ****". Many heteros engage in the latter, often producing "unwanted" or "neglected" progeny. How sad is that?
 
It is the value one places on sex that becomes shared. One may look at sex as sacred or may view it as a thrill. This is what is learned. Instead as a gift from God, it becomes something to toy with. Perverts usually leave God out of the picture entirely.

Snag is, homosexuals aren’t ‘perverts.’

In fact, in the United States, the majority of homosexuals are Christian, adhere to its tenets, they even marry their same-sex partner in accordance with Christian marriage rituals.

Some of the most devout Christians are gay.
Sounds like you're speaking of Roman Catholic priests. Also, there are no marriage rituals that include same sex partners. 'I now pronounce you husband and husband,' is not in any Christian book I'm aware of.

‘Ritual’ is not exclusive to text; Christian same-sex couples are marrying in Christian churches in accordance with Christian ritual where two people are making a life-long commitment predicated on love and mutual respect, the same love and mutual respect as opposite-sex couples.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom