homosexual marriage

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Repeatedly stating your opinion as if it were fact does not magically make it fact.

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweeter Ironies...

 

[Syriusly]

It is exceedingly difficult to disagree with you given the LGBT cult icon Harvey Milk and his sodomizing his adopted minor ward and many other "young waifs with substance abuse problems"...0% of any LGBT person denouncing that. And the same with lewd acts performed on purpose in gay pride parades where children invited to watch and attend.

Anyone supporting/not denouncing either of those two revealing governing LGBT tenets belongs on a sex-offenders' registry.

Indeed... Homosexuality is spread best by the imprinting of homosexual activity upon children. !

Of course there is no evidence that is actually happening. If it were true- where did the first homosexual come from? Do you believe that God created some homosexual Adam to start imprinting homosexuality on children?

In reality scientific authorities are not certain how someone ends being attracted to the same gender.

One of the most intriguing and newest theories has to do with Epigenetics:

For an evolutionary biologist, homosexuality is something of a puzzle. It’s a common trait, found inup to 10% of the population. It appears to be run in families, suggesting that it is hereditary, at least in part. And yet it defies the very reason why traits are passed on from generation to generation. How could something that hinders childbearing be passed down so frequently from parents to children?

Researchers at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) think they may have an answer. It’s not in written in our DNA sequence itself, they suggest, which explains why scientists have failed so far to find “gay genes,” despite intensive investigations. Instead, it’s written in how our genes are expressed: that is, in certain modifications to how and when DNA is activated. These changes can have environmental roots, so are not normally permanent enough to be passed from parent to child. But occasionally, they are.

“It’s not genetics. It’s not DNA. It’s not pieces of DNA. It’s epigenetics,” says Sergey Gavrilets, a NIMBioS researcher and an author on the paper that outlines the new theory of homosexuality, published in The Quarterly Review of Biology. “The hypothesis we put forward is based on epigenetic marks,” he says.

To be specific, the new theory suggests that homosexuality is caused by epigenetic marks, or “epi-marks,” related to sensitivity to hormones in the womb. These are compounds that sit on DNA and regulate how active, or inactive certain genes are, and also control when during development these genes are most prolific.

But I am sure you won't let science get in the way of arguing that homosexuals should be discriminated against.

Homosexuality is found in the greatest numbers, in pockets of the culture which are experiencing major stress..

Or we could go with science.

One of the most intriguing and newest theories has to do with Epigenetics:

For an evolutionary biologist, homosexuality is something of a puzzle. It’s a common trait, found inup to 10% of the population. It appears to be run in families, suggesting that it is hereditary, at least in part. And yet it defies the very reason why traits are passed on from generation to generation. How could something that hinders childbearing be passed down so frequently from parents to children?

Researchers at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) think they may have an answer. It’s not in written in our DNA sequence itself, they suggest, which explains why scientists have failed so far to find “gay genes,” despite intensive investigations. Instead, it’s written in how our genes are expressed: that is, in certain modifications to how and when DNA is activated. These changes can have environmental roots, so are not normally permanent enough to be passed from parent to child. But occasionally, they are.

“It’s not genetics. It’s not DNA. It’s not pieces of DNA. It’s epigenetics,” says Sergey Gavrilets, a NIMBioS researcher and an author on the paper that outlines the new theory of homosexuality, published in The Quarterly Review of Biology. “The hypothesis we put forward is based on epigenetic marks,” he says.

To be specific, the new theory suggests that homosexuality is caused by epigenetic marks, or “epi-marks,” related to sensitivity to hormones in the womb. These are compounds that sit on DNA and regulate how active, or inactive certain genes are, and also control when during development these genes are most prolific.
But I am sure you won't let science get in the way of arguing that homosexuals should be discriminated against.

LOL! You're conflating science with the politically correct farce which advances subjective deceit,!)

So you don't believe in science.....if you don't agree with science.

Why am I not surprised?

One of the most intriguing and newest theories has to do with Epigenetics:

For an evolutionary biologist, homosexuality is something of a puzzle. It’s a common trait, found inup to 10% of the population. It appears to be run in families, suggesting that it is hereditary, at least in part. And yet it defies the very reason why traits are passed on from generation to generation. How could something that hinders childbearing be passed down so frequently from parents to children?

Researchers at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) think they may have an answer. It’s not in written in our DNA sequence itself, they suggest, which explains why scientists have failed so far to find “gay genes,” despite intensive investigations. Instead, it’s written in how our genes are expressed: that is, in certain modifications to how and when DNA is activated. These changes can have environmental roots, so are not normally permanent enough to be passed from parent to child. But occasionally, they are.

“It’s not genetics. It’s not DNA. It’s not pieces of DNA. It’s epigenetics,” says Sergey Gavrilets, a NIMBioS researcher and an author on the paper that outlines the new theory of homosexuality, published in The Quarterly Review of Biology. “The hypothesis we put forward is based on epigenetic marks,” he says.

To be specific, the new theory suggests that homosexuality is caused by epigenetic marks, or “epi-marks,” related to sensitivity to hormones in the womb. These are compounds that sit on DNA and regulate how active, or inactive certain genes are, and also control when during development these genes are most prolific.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Gay marriage is happening and soon will be nationwide.


Get over it.

There's no such thing as "Gay-Marriage".

Marriage is the joining of one man and one wo-man.

Well, there are now a whole host of Gay married people who don't really care about your opinion of gay marriage.

Gay married people are gay people married to people of the opposite gender... why would they care about any of this?
!

Thousands- maybe millions of same gender couples are legally married.

Not their problem you can't accept it.

No more than it was the problem of mixed race couples when bigots couldn't accept their marriages.

No person is married to another person of the same gender.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one wo-man. With mass-hysterical pretenses by an irrational, militant cult of perversion, notwithstanding.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

There is no marriage in nature.

LOL! Nonsense... in truth, marriage is the natural occurrence, (thus axiomatic to nature) wherein one man and one woman join, analogous to coitus, wherein the two biologically complimenting bodies join in a sustainable bond, for the purposes of procreation, serving the biological imperative OKA: The Propagation of the Species. Such serves as the means to sustain the female during gestation, as well as providing for a stable environment well suited for the nurturing and raising of children through, to the point where they become, sound, viable adults, so as to provide offspring with the blue-print to repeat the process.

As noted above, Marriage is exclusively and without exception: The joining of one man and one wo-man... .

 

[Syriusly]

Why do you think that?

When blacks and whites were allowed to legally marry each other did you feel that we couldn't have true marriage equality?

You missed the post of mine stating that was tragic.

The demographic group remains the only one that can create children

You: Guess we can't have true marriage equality then aye?

Why do you think that?

When blacks and whites were allowed to legally marry each other did you feel that we couldn't have true marriage equality?

Do you support incest and polygamous marriages since they can have children?

There's no such thing as Marriage Equality... Marriage is the joining of one man and one wo-man. But that's only because that's how Nature designed things.

There is no marriage in nature.

LOL! Nonsense... in truth, marriage is the natural occurrence,.

there is no marriage in nature.

There is sex.

There is even pair bonding.

But there is no marriage in nature.

Entirely a human invention.

 

[Syriusly]

Gay marriage is happening and soon will be nationwide.


Get over it.

There's no such thing as "Gay-Marriage".

Marriage is the joining of one man and one wo-man.

Well, there are now a whole host of Gay married people who don't really care about your opinion of gay marriage.

Gay married people are gay people married to people of the opposite gender... why would they care about any of this?
!

Thousands- maybe millions of same gender couples are legally married.

Not their problem you can't accept it.

No more than it was the problem of mixed race couples when bigots couldn't accept their marriages.

No person is married to another person of the same gender.
.

That is legally and factually incorrect.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

There's no such thing as "Gay-Marriage".

Marriage is the joining of one man and one wo-man.

Well, there are now a whole host of Gay married people who don't really care about your opinion of gay marriage.

Gay married people are gay people married to people of the opposite gender... why would they care about any of this?
!

Thousands- maybe millions of same gender couples are legally married.

Not their problem you can't accept it.

No more than it was the problem of mixed race couples when bigots couldn't accept their marriages.

No person is married to another person of the same gender.
.

That is legally and factually incorrect.

It is factually correct and it is morally correct, two immutable, objective concepts. What is 'legal' is irrelevant where the basis for that legality is demonstrable deceit and which came to pass through treachery and fraudulence.

Put it this way ... when nature gets through with its current run of Ebola on the US, which was provided courtesy of the inability to recognize the necessity of standards, the survivors of that pestilence will have no desire for the tolerance of those things which breed deadly viruses, such as say ... homosexuality and other such forms of deviancy, perversion and debauchery.

You know... folks such as... well, yourself.

 

[Pop23]

You mean Loving didn't fix that polygamy/incest problem?

Just like Gay marriage doesn't mean polygamy and incest- Mixed race marriage didn't mean polygamy or incest either.

Guess we can't have true marriage equality then aye?

Why do you think that?

When blacks and whites were allowed to legally marry each other did you feel that we couldn't have true marriage equality?

You missed the post of mine stating that was tragic.

The demographic group remains the only one that can create children

You: Guess we can't have true marriage equality then aye?

Why do you think that?

When blacks and whites were allowed to legally marry each other did you feel that we couldn't have true marriage equality?

Do you support incest and polygamous marriages since they can have children?

Nope, the dynamics of the relationships are such that they should never be allowed

Same as same sex

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

There is no marriage in nature.

LOL! Nonsense... in truth, marriage is the natural occurrence, (thus axiomatic to nature) wherein one man and one woman join, analogous to coitus, wherein the two biologically complimenting bodies join in a sustainable bond, for the purposes of procreation, serving the biological imperative OKA: The Propagation of the Species. Such serves as the means to sustain the female during gestation, as well as providing for a stable environment well suited for the nurturing and raising of children through, to the point where they become, sound, viable adults, resultant from the life of training, inculcated through the respective natures of the complimenting genders. This, so as to provide offspring with the embedded blue-print through which they can repeat the process.

As noted above, Marriage is exclusively and without exception: The joining of one man and one wo-man... .

See how easy this is folks?

Think of this as intellectual batting practice... and yes, for the great ones, it truly IS as easy as it looks.

 

[Czernobog]

Gay marriage is happening and soon will be nationwide.


Get over it.

There's no such thing as "Gay-Marriage".

Marriage is the joining of one man and one wo-man.

Well, there are now a whole host of Gay married people who don't really care about your opinion of gay marriage.

Gay married people are gay people married to people of the opposite gender... why would they care about any of this?

This is about the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality who demand others accept their pretense that two people of the same gender are legitimate people, who can be legitimately married.

LOL! Can ya IMAGINE? LOL... Militant Pervs... they're HYSTERICAL!

Uh, no. Gay married people are gay people married to their gay life partners, just as the courts said they would recognize, and your sophomoric little temper tantrum ("It's not marriage! Itsnotitsnotitsnotitsnot!!!") doesn't change the reality.

 

[Czernobog]

Repeatedly stating your opinion as if it were fact does not magically make it fact.

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweeter Ironies...

The only irony here is you insisting that something isn't what it is. You do know that marriage is a contract, right? So, when two people have a legally procured marriage license, and they enter into the contract as recognized by the state, they are married. Your opinion to the contrary notwithstanding.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Just like Gay marriage doesn't mean polygamy and incest- Mixed race marriage didn't mean polygamy or incest either.

Guess we can't have true marriage equality then aye?

Why do you think that?

When blacks and whites were allowed to legally marry each other did you feel that we couldn't have true marriage equality?

You missed the post of mine stating that was tragic.

The demographic group remains the only one that can create children

You: Guess we can't have true marriage equality then aye?

Why do you think that?

When blacks and whites were allowed to legally marry each other did you feel that we couldn't have true marriage equality?

Do you support incest and polygamous marriages since they can have children?

Nope, the dynamics of the relationships are such that they should never be allowed

Same as same sex

Clearly, the fact that black males and white females fall well within 'well qualified' for the standards of marriage and that a Black person has absolutely NO CHOICE in whether or not they reflect a dark caramel hue... while choosing to act upon and identify one's self through their aberrant sexual desires, is purely the CHOICE of the respective sexual deviant.

A black or whit person will be black and white respectively... all week. While a homosexual can 'legally' be homosexual on Monday, Wednesday and Friday and straight as a fecal tainted cucumber, Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday... .

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweeter Ironies...

The only irony here is (blah blah feckless drivel... yadda yadda)

LOL! Tisk tisk... It's such a buzz kill to have to explain the more intellectually acute parts. But oh well... such is the ever-present hazard of engaging progressives in conversation: (The Irony is in your lament of people who claim what they say is true because they say so, while in the process of implying that what you're saying is true, because... Wait for it! THIS IS THE IRONIC PART: you say so.)

 

[Moonglow]

You missed the post of mine stating that was tragic.

The demographic group remains the only one that can create children

You: Guess we can't have true marriage equality then aye?

Why do you think that?

When blacks and whites were allowed to legally marry each other did you feel that we couldn't have true marriage equality?

Do you support incest and polygamous marriages since they can have children?

There's no such thing as Marriage Equality... Marriage is the joining of one man and one wo-man. But that's only because that's how Nature designed things.

There is no marriage in nature.

LOL! Nonsense... in truth, marriage is the natural occurrence,.

there is no marriage in nature.

There is sex.

There is even pair bonding.

But there is no marriage in nature.

Entirely a human invention.

I am sure females pushed the envelope the most...

 

[Czernobog]

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweeter Ironies...

The only irony here is (blah blah feckless drivel... yadda yadda)

LOL! Tisk tisk... It's such a buzz kill to have to explain the more intellectual acute parts. But oh well... such is the ever-present hazard of engaging progressives in conversation: (The Irony is in your lament of people who claim what they say is true because they say so, while in the process of implying that what you're saying is true, because... Wait for it! THIS IS THE IRONIC PART: you say so.)

Ah, but that's just it, this Gay marriage is not a "thing' because we say so. Gay marriage is legally recognized because the Courts say so. And, between you, and the courts, guess which one has more authority to determine the legal reality of our society. Here's a hint, it's not you. So, in your own little bubble, you can insist that Gay Marriage doesn't exist all you like. However, while you are doing so, more, and more gay couples are engaging in that social contract that you keep insisting doesn't exist.

You are right, irony is sweet.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweeter Ironies...

The only irony here is (blah blah feckless drivel... yadda yadda)

LOL! Tisk tisk... It's such a buzz kill to have to explain the more intellectual acute parts. But oh well... such is the ever-present hazard of engaging progressives in conversation: (The Irony is in your lament of people who claim what they say is true because they say so, while in the process of implying that what you're saying is true, because... Wait for it! THIS IS THE IRONIC PART: you say so.)

Ah, but that's just it, this Gay marriage is not a "thing' because we say so. Gay marriage is legally recognized because the Courts say so. And, between you, and the courts, guess which one has more authority to determine the legal reality of our society. Here's a hint, it's not you. So, in your own little bubble, you can insist that Gay Marriage doesn't exist all you like. However, while you are doing so, more, and more gay couples are engaging in that social contract that you keep insisting doesn't exist.

You are right, irony is sweet.

Gay Marriage IS a thing. Assuming of course that a fraudulence is a thing... and it is. That it's a judicially fabricated fraud, doesn't change that.

(Ya see Scamp... abusing judicial authority doesn't make something right. It undermines the trust of the judiciary, which undermines the potential for survival of that fraudulent 'thing'.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one wo-man. And it is so because that is how nature designed it. Whether I say so or you say no... it would remain that, if every human being on this planet believed otherwise, with every fiber of their beings. Nature doesn't give a red rats ass about the braying foolishness of the intellectually addled... natural law is how IT IS and all the eye squinted, teary-eye pleas of every degenerate on earth, isn't going to change that.)

 

[Czernobog]

Ya see Scamp... abusing judicial authority doesn't make something right.

And that is why your logic keeps failing you. You keep assuming that the Law is about "Right and Wrong". It isn't. Civil, Secular Law is simply about legal, and illegal. Right and wrong do not enter in. This is because right and wrong is a personal matter, and cannot be legislated - at least not without depriving people of their individual liberty of self-determination.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Ya see Scamp... abusing judicial authority doesn't make something right.

And that is why your logic keeps failing you. You keep assuming that the Law is about "Right and Wrong". It isn't. Civil, Secular Law is simply about legal, and illegal. Right and wrong do not enter in. This is because right and wrong is a personal matter, and cannot be legislated - at least not without depriving people of their individual liberty of self-determination.

The only legitimate purpose for law is to serve justice. Absent objectivity, there is no potential for truth, absent truth there is no potential for trust. Absent truth and trust there is no potential for morality and absent morality there is no potential for justice.

And absent justice, there is no potential that free people will consent to be governed... and without the consent of the governed, there is no potential for peace, order or any of the things you feel are so important to you.

We, the Americans, have tolerated the whimsy of the sexual abnormal. And with the Left having hand delivered EBOLA we can readily see that that was a mistake.

As a result there will be no 'next generation' of openly 'gay' anything... you've screwed yourselves with this nonsense and there's nothing that you or I can do about it. The wheels of the closet door, are rolling. The bad news, for you... is that only a very few of you will manage to get back in there. The rest of ya will not survive, but if it makes ya feel any better, it's not just YOU, it's every variant of the freak show.

The only thing left to be determined now, is how violent things will get, as Nature provides for the means of decent people to yank power from the Ideological Left... .

Franky I would prefer that it be a peaceful transition, but... to be perfectly honest, I really don't give a dam' at this point. Whatever it takes is fine with me.

In 20 years one will not be able to find a inherently color coordinated person in ALL of Manhatten... .

Like it, don't like... it doesn't matter. You can't fool Ma' Nature scout, and should ya try, she'll beat the crap out of ya!

Aids wasn't enough, so nature has ratcheted up the ante... .

 

[Czernobog]

Ya see Scamp... abusing judicial authority doesn't make something right.

And that is why your logic keeps failing you. You keep assuming that the Law is about "Right and Wrong". It isn't. Civil, Secular Law is simply about legal, and illegal. Right and wrong do not enter in. This is because right and wrong is a personal matter, and cannot be legislated - at least not without depriving people of their individual liberty of self-determination.

The only legitimate purpose for law is to serve justice.

No, it's not. The purpose for law is to protect me from you. We have already been through that. All of the rest is justification for depriving me of my right to self-determination in the name of your sense of "morality".

 

[TrueMan]

I will never support same sex marriage. I believe that its not right. Marriage has to be only between a man and woman. But respect one another and know that there is never going to be a one side victory on this.