Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
pimping children?
in what way?
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mindProve it!! Put up or shut up.Except the reams and reams and tomes and tomes of research showing that a boy not having a father or a girl not having a mother for life is deleterious to them. Just that. And that uniquely of all parenting situations, "gay marrieds" possess a contract they share with prospective children that guarantees them the absence of a father or mother under their roof for life.
Just that. Same sex marriage actually, truly, provenly, and proximally hurts children for the duration of their entire lives; using a contract no less. That is illegal also per contract laws where both adults and children share vital benefits. See Obergefell Opinion page 15 for details; and the Infancy Doctrine.. Fun fact, children's interests in the contract re: their stated benefits and shared-status, was not separately briefed to the court in Obergefell. That means the USSC in Obergefell did not follow law in rendering its decision.
It is stunning to me that anyone can look at the complex, complicated, difficult job of effective parenting and raising a sane, functional, productive human being, which is incredibly hard to do even when you have a mother and father working at it together, and just casually decide that it's no big hairy deal if you simply subtract one of them from the equation. Meh. It's like looking at the schematics for building a nuclear reactor, and then deciding that the lead shielding isn't necessary.
No kidding.
My family bought into that feel good the devil be damned marriage is just a piece of paper single women have a right to raise their kids alone bs that was pushed on our society during the 60s and 80s...and it decimated it. There is a reason we celebrate and support traditional family values..and it's because children in traditional families do better. That's the beginning and end of it. That isn't to say there isn't the occasional non traditional family that doesn't produce an amazing set of kids..but for the most part, homosexual families and single parent families are poorer, are more dysfuctional in every way, and have children who suffer for their selfish decisions for their entire lives.
How do you agree on a standard of morality with people who find the whole idea of a standard of morality offensive?
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mindProve it!! Put up or shut up.It is stunning to me that anyone can look at the complex, complicated, difficult job of effective parenting and raising a sane, functional, productive human being, which is incredibly hard to do even when you have a mother and father working at it together, and just casually decide that it's no big hairy deal if you simply subtract one of them from the equation. Meh. It's like looking at the schematics for building a nuclear reactor, and then deciding that the lead shielding isn't necessary.
No kidding.
My family bought into that feel good the devil be damned marriage is just a piece of paper single women have a right to raise their kids alone bs that was pushed on our society during the 60s and 80s...and it decimated it. There is a reason we celebrate and support traditional family values..and it's because children in traditional families do better. That's the beginning and end of it. That isn't to say there isn't the occasional non traditional family that doesn't produce an amazing set of kids..but for the most part, homosexual families and single parent families are poorer, are more dysfuctional in every way, and have children who suffer for their selfish decisions for their entire lives.
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mindProve it!! Put up or shut up.No kidding.
My family bought into that feel good the devil be damned marriage is just a piece of paper single women have a right to raise their kids alone bs that was pushed on our society during the 60s and 80s...and it decimated it. There is a reason we celebrate and support traditional family values..and it's because children in traditional families do better. That's the beginning and end of it. That isn't to say there isn't the occasional non traditional family that doesn't produce an amazing set of kids..but for the most part, homosexual families and single parent families are poorer, are more dysfuctional in every way, and have children who suffer for their selfish decisions for their entire lives.
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mindProve it!! Put up or shut up.No kidding.
My family bought into that feel good the devil be damned marriage is just a piece of paper single women have a right to raise their kids alone bs that was pushed on our society during the 60s and 80s...and it decimated it. There is a reason we celebrate and support traditional family values..and it's because children in traditional families do better. That's the beginning and end of it. That isn't to say there isn't the occasional non traditional family that doesn't produce an amazing set of kids..but for the most part, homosexual families and single parent families are poorer, are more dysfuctional in every way, and have children who suffer for their selfish decisions for their entire lives.
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mindProve it!! Put up or shut up.
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mindProve it!! Put up or shut up.
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
and my worldview is the *normal* one.
Yes, YOUR 'worldview'.
not everyones
Yes that's my point. Pedophiles exist. Their existence doesn't impart morality.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
illegal?
Where?
Got a link to the law?
Is this a healthy loving environment, or is it sex abuse of minors?
It is, after all, illegal to entice children to think or participate in sexual activity...
So why is it the homosexual community thinks that they are exempt?
Ellen praises girlish biological boy's "good lips":
Sexual abuse of a child by definition occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor. The only evidence seems to be your warped imagination.
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mind
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mind
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
and my worldview is the *normal* one.
Yes, YOUR 'worldview'.
not everyones
Yes that's my point. Pedophiles exist. Their existence doesn't impart morality.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
illegal?
Where?
Got a link to the law?
Child pornography is a form of child sexual exploitation. Federal law defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (persons less than 18 years old). Images of child pornography are also referred to aschild sexual abuse images.Jul 25, 2017
Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice
Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mindProve it!! Put up or shut up.No kidding.
My family bought into that feel good the devil be damned marriage is just a piece of paper single women have a right to raise their kids alone bs that was pushed on our society during the 60s and 80s...and it decimated it. There is a reason we celebrate and support traditional family values..and it's because children in traditional families do better. That's the beginning and end of it. That isn't to say there isn't the occasional non traditional family that doesn't produce an amazing set of kids..but for the most part, homosexual families and single parent families are poorer, are more dysfuctional in every way, and have children who suffer for their selfish decisions for their entire lives.
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mind
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
Until all parties can agree on a standard of "morality" y'all gonna be spending a lot of time blue in the face... the word 'futile' comes to mind
There it is...I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
The people who think that just because they think it's cool means it's *okay*..and who think that diversity demands that we accommodate all lifestyles including the ones that exploit, damage, and molest children...are criminals.
Just because you like it doesn't mean we have to accommodate it. Just because you don't agree with decency and morality doesn't mean you get to molest, exploit and sexualize children.
Get it?
I'm sorry, the entire world recognizes that dressing up children in sexually provacative clothing and having them lisp about their *sexuality* is immoral, depraved, and criminal.
maybe your, (very small) world does.
No, pedosexuals are still the minority, thank goodness, and my worldview is the *normal* one.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
and my worldview is the *normal* one.
Yes, YOUR 'worldview'.
not everyones
Yes that's my point. Pedophiles exist. Their existence doesn't impart morality.
In case you missed it..dressing up little boys to look like sexualized little girls and parading them in front of faggots is sick, twisted, and illegal.
illegal?
Where?
Got a link to the law?
Child pornography is a form of child sexual exploitation. Federal law defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (persons less than 18 years old). Images of child pornography are also referred to aschild sexual abuse images.Jul 25, 2017
Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice
Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice
Is this a healthy loving environment, or is it sex abuse of minors?
It is, after all, illegal to entice children to think or participate in sexual activity...
So why is it the homosexual community thinks that they are exempt?
Ellen praises girlish biological boy's "good lips":
Sexual abuse of a child by definition occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor. The only evidence seems to be your warped imagination.
Not a thorough definition. It can also be exposure to porn or fornication or other inappropriate media. It could be over-emphasizing sexuality convos at too young an age. It COULD be choosing a gender FOR a child before they even comprehend their behaviors or preferences. Or taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Is this a healthy loving environment, or is it sex abuse of minors?
It is, after all, illegal to entice children to think or participate in sexual activity...
So why is it the homosexual community thinks that they are exempt?
Ellen praises girlish biological boy's "good lips":
Sexual abuse of a child by definition occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor. The only evidence seems to be your warped imagination.
Not a thorough definition. It can also be exposure to porn or fornication or other inappropriate media. It could be over-emphasizing sexuality convos at too young an age. It COULD be choosing a gender FOR a child before they even comprehend their behaviors or preferences. Or taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Well if it was 'choosing a gender' for a child before they could even comprehend their behaviors or preferences a whole lot of parents of transgender adults whose parents tried to force them not to be transgender.
taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Families have been taking kids to nudist colonies for decades- and while its not my cup of tea- not sure why you think that nudity by itself would be a form of pornography.
Certainly we are in no disagreement that adults should not be exposing children to pornography- but a nude adult with no sexual context is not pornography.
Is this a healthy loving environment, or is it sex abuse of minors?
It is, after all, illegal to entice children to think or participate in sexual activity...
So why is it the homosexual community thinks that they are exempt?
Ellen praises girlish biological boy's "good lips":
Sexual abuse of a child by definition occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor. The only evidence seems to be your warped imagination.
Not a thorough definition. It can also be exposure to porn or fornication or other inappropriate media. It could be over-emphasizing sexuality convos at too young an age. It COULD be choosing a gender FOR a child before they even comprehend their behaviors or preferences. Or taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Well if it was 'choosing a gender' for a child before they could even comprehend their behaviors or preferences a whole lot of parents of transgender adults whose parents tried to force them not to be transgender.
taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Families have been taking kids to nudist colonies for decades- and while its not my cup of tea- not sure why you think that nudity by itself would be a form of pornography.
Certainly we are in no disagreement that adults should not be exposing children to pornography- but a nude adult with no sexual context is not pornography.
Is this a healthy loving environment, or is it sex abuse of minors?
It is, after all, illegal to entice children to think or participate in sexual activity...
So why is it the homosexual community thinks that they are exempt?
Ellen praises girlish biological boy's "good lips":
Sexual abuse of a child by definition occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor. The only evidence seems to be your warped imagination.
Not a thorough definition. It can also be exposure to porn or fornication or other inappropriate media. It could be over-emphasizing sexuality convos at too young an age. It COULD be choosing a gender FOR a child before they even comprehend their behaviors or preferences. Or taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Well if it was 'choosing a gender' for a child before they could even comprehend their behaviors or preferences a whole lot of parents of transgender adults whose parents tried to force them not to be transgender.
taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Families have been taking kids to nudist colonies for decades- and while its not my cup of tea- not sure why you think that nudity by itself would be a form of pornography.
Certainly we are in no disagreement that adults should not be exposing children to pornography- but a nude adult with no sexual context is not pornography.
You know, every time I went on a deployment, I always had to take a couple of days to get used to the beaches in the Med. Why? Because ALL of them are top optional for women, and many women like to walk around in nothing more than a skimpy bikini bottom. In Brazil, it's the same thing, but they prefer french cut bottoms.
I also remember one time a few women from the AIRDET decided to go native in Greece one port visit. Well, the OIC chewed them out for not being covered on their chest and sent them back to the ship. When the CO heard about it, he chewed out the OIC, because the CO said that was probably one of the safest things for them to do, because they didn't look like Americans when they were topless. The girls were back on the beach the next day, topless.
I've never understood why Americans are so prudish.
Is this a healthy loving environment, or is it sex abuse of minors?
It is, after all, illegal to entice children to think or participate in sexual activity...
So why is it the homosexual community thinks that they are exempt?
Ellen praises girlish biological boy's "good lips":
Sexual abuse of a child by definition occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor. The only evidence seems to be your warped imagination.
Not a thorough definition. It can also be exposure to porn or fornication or other inappropriate media. It could be over-emphasizing sexuality convos at too young an age. It COULD be choosing a gender FOR a child before they even comprehend their behaviors or preferences. Or taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Well if it was 'choosing a gender' for a child before they could even comprehend their behaviors or preferences a whole lot of parents of transgender adults whose parents tried to force them not to be transgender.
taking them to nudist activities or Gay Pride parades before they have an adequate understanding of such things.
Families have been taking kids to nudist colonies for decades- and while its not my cup of tea- not sure why you think that nudity by itself would be a form of pornography.
Certainly we are in no disagreement that adults should not be exposing children to pornography- but a nude adult with no sexual context is not pornography.
You know, every time I went on a deployment, I always had to take a couple of days to get used to the beaches in the Med. Why? Because ALL of them are top optional for women, and many women like to walk around in nothing more than a skimpy bikini bottom. In Brazil, it's the same thing, but they prefer french cut bottoms.
I also remember one time a few women from the AIRDET decided to go native in Greece one port visit. Well, the OIC chewed them out for not being covered on their chest and sent them back to the ship. When the CO heard about it, he chewed out the OIC, because the CO said that was probably one of the safest things for them to do, because they didn't look like Americans when they were topless. The girls were back on the beach the next day, topless.
I've never understood why Americans are so prudish.
I (fondly) remember Page 3 girls from my tour in London.
NO newspaper in the US would have the balls to do that.
Not hard to say, and prove, we're more Victorian than Queen Victoria was.
Is this a healthy loving environment, or is it sex abuse of minors?
It is, after all, illegal to entice children to think or participate in sexual activity...
So why is it the homosexual community thinks that they are exempt?
Ellen praises girlish biological boy's "good lips":
Sexual abuse of a child by definition occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor. The only evidence seems to be your warped imagination.
Yeah that's straight out of the pedosexual manual as well.You think he's employable because he's an underaged kid in makeup and heels.
That's called pimping.
No ... I think he will be able to eventually get a job or work for himself.
You are the one hung up on his age, the heels and everything.
.
"Age is irrelevant..all that matters is that they express themselves sexually"
"Love knows no age bounds"
"Children are individuals and have *rights* to experience love in all it's forms
Uh huh. Okay, first of all, your first sentence made no actual sense. Maybe dial back on your "how DARE you!" outrage enough to be coherent, huh?
OK, I screwed up the first sentence! Sue me. Here it is again:
It's stunning to me, to listen to you people rant and rave about this issue, claiming that kids need a mother and a father, while having the temerity to expect that your appeals to ignorance will convince anybody except those who already agree with you.
