Home insurance and climate

Old Rocks said:
Meaning what, silly boi?
Click to expand...



What that article documents is


1. the actual data from satellites and balloons showed NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
2. that data was FUDGED in 2005 with laughable BS excuses for doing so
3. the CO2 FRAUD has NO ACTUAL DATA showing atmospheric warming, only FUDGE
4. actual science rejects CO2 FRAUD right there, "the science" fudges the data and continues to bilk the taxpayer
 
Old Rocks said:
Ah yes, all those scientists in the Scientific Societies, all the people at the National Academies of Science, and all the scientists at the major Universities are fools, and only you are aware of the truth. You and a bunch of braindead MAGAts.
Click to expand...
Ahhhh yes, the perpetual appeal to authority logic fail.

You never cease to please.
 
Old Rocks said:
Yessirreeeeeeeeeeee........................... Oil, coal, and gas much better investment, they get much bigger subsidies than does renewables.

fossil fuel subsidies compared to renewable subsidies - Search Videos

Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.
www.bing.com www.bing.com
Click to expand...

Once again you show your talent as being easily misled by the media as this post makes clear why they are very small, short term subsidies:

The $7 Trillion Lie​

How the IMF cooked the books to demonize fossil fuels and justify the biggest transfer of taxpayer money in history.​

Dr. Matthew Wielicki
Jul 02, 2025

LINK

Here is a chart showing the true reality of subsidies:

1751941327894.webp


You are a gullible fool.
 
westwall said:
Ahhhh yes, the perpetual appeal to authority logic fail.

You never cease to please.
Click to expand...

He never realizes that the rank-and-file members of all those societies were never polled, it comes from the board of directors and similar very small number of members making a blanket claim.

Consensus is political and they are a captive of politics from the U.N. and the IPCC all from governmental bodies who have a direct and very large vested interest in promoting the climate change scam.
 
westwall said:
Ahhhh yes, the perpetual appeal to authority logic fail.

You never cease to please.
Click to expand...
Ah yes. I really think that the research of real scientists far outweighs the flap-yap of pretenders on the internet. So when you take your car to a mechanic, instead of a brain surgeon, you are appealing to authority? LOL You logic is just as false as your lies.
 
Old Rocks said:
Ah yes. I really think that the research of real scientists far outweighs the flap-yap of pretenders on the internet. So when you take your car to a mechanic, instead of a brain surgeon, you are appealing to authority? LOL You logic is just as false as your lies.
Click to expand...

How has Michael Mann's research been working out for him lately?

Has he paid the legal judgements against him yet?
 
Sunsettommy said:
He never realizes that the rank-and-file members of all those societies were never polled, it comes from the board of directors and similar very small number of members making a blanket claim.

Consensus is political and they are a captive of politics from the U.N. and the IPCC all from governmental bodies who have a direct and very large vested interest in promoting the climate change scam.
Click to expand...
What a fucked up lie. Here is are survey questions from a Scientific Society of which I am an affiliate member.


 
Sunsettommy said:
Once again you show your talent as being easily misled by the media as this post makes clear why they are very small, short term subsidies:

The $7 Trillion Lie​

How the IMF cooked the books to demonize fossil fuels and justify the biggest transfer of taxpayer money in history.​

Dr. Matthew Wielicki
Jul 02, 2025

LINK

Here is a chart showing the true reality of subsidies:

View attachment 1133665

You are a gullible fool.
Click to expand...
The problem is that fossil fuels produce far more pollution than just that used in electrical generation. And that graph was produced by a fossil fuel shill. Love the fact that the graph does not include the last four years. You see, if it did, it would look far different. For the cost of renewables has been going down every year prior to 2025, while for that period that price of fossil fuels has risen. Of course renewables are not going down now because of the tariffs and other impediments to the adaption renewables that our senile and demented President has put in place. But we will soon be past him, and the economics will force the adaption of renewables even without subsidies.
 
Old Rocks said:
Has Trump served the time in jail he earned for his 34 felonies he was convicted of?
Click to expand...

I know, 34 bookkeeping misdemeanors that were beyond the statute of limitations
is very similar to the lies Mann and his lawyers told in court.

Trump was fined $0 for his "felonies" while Mann was fined $1 million plus, with no felonies.

Hilarious!
 
Old Rocks said:
The problem is that fossil fuels produce far more pollution than just that used in electrical generation. And that graph was produced by a fossil fuel shill. Love the fact that the graph does not include the last four years. You see, if it did, it would look far different. For the cost of renewables has been going down every year prior to 2025, while for that period that price of fossil fuels has risen. Of course renewables are not going down now because of the tariffs and other impediments to the adaption renewables that our senile and demented President has put in place. But we will soon be past him, and the economics will force the adaption of renewables even without subsidies.
Click to expand...

For the cost of renewables has been going down every year prior to 2025, while for that period that price of fossil fuels has risen.

Is that why California and Germany pay so much more for electricity than the rest of us?

All their cheap renewables?
 
Old Rocks said:
Ah yes. I really think that the research of real scientists far outweighs the flap-yap of pretenders on the internet. So when you take your car to a mechanic, instead of a brain surgeon, you are appealing to authority? LOL You logic is just as false as your lies.
Click to expand...
What "research" do you speak of?

That computer derived fiction you clods get all hot and bothered about?

That's not research, old girl, that's a novel.
 
Toddsterpatriot said:
For the cost of renewables has been going down every year prior to 2025, while for that period that price of fossil fuels has risen.

Is that why California and Germany pay so much more for electricity than the rest of us?

All their cheap renewables?
Click to expand...
Every read "Wealth of Nations"? Do you understand the terms supply and demand? Do you understand that when demand constantly outruns supply, you have to build more supply, and that has to be paid for? Here in Oregon, we have cheap electricity with 62% from renewables. California gets 54% from renewables, but is constantly short on power due to the economic dynamo that California is. With the world's fifth largest economy, California contributes 14% of the US GDP. Yes, they are having a devil's time keeping up with demand and that will continue as California's economy continues to grow.
 
Old Rocks said:
Has Trump served the time in jail he earned for his 34 felonies he was convicted of?
Click to expand...

A Penn climate scientist was awarded $1 million in a defamation case. Now he owes that much to those who sued him.​

A D.C. judge reduced a $1 million verdict in favor of Michael Mann to $5,000, and the climate scientist is now on the hook for $1 million in legal fees.


DURR
 
15th post
westwall said:
What "research" do you speak of?

That computer derived fiction you clods get all hot and bothered about?

That's not research, old girl, that's a novel.
Click to expand...
Let's see, is the satellite data computer fiction? Is the measurement of the amount of GHG's computer fiction? Was Foote and Tyndall's experiments in 1858 computer fiction? Are the satellite measured reduction of Arctic sea ice computer fiction? Is the fact that the Northwest Passage was transited by a 1000 passenger cruise ship in 2016 computer fiction? The fact that you are a liar and shill concerning science is not fiction. Afraid to say what the American Geophysical Union says about AGW? Or what the Geological Society of America says? Your continual lies reduces your credibility to zero.
 
Old Rocks said:
Every read "Wealth of Nations"? Do you understand the terms supply and demand? Do you understand that when demand constantly outruns supply, you have to build more supply, and that has to be paid for? Here in Oregon, we have cheap electricity with 62% from renewables. California gets 54% from renewables, but is constantly short on power due to the economic dynamo that California is. With the world's fifth largest economy, California contributes 14% of the US GDP. Yes, they are having a devil's time keeping up with demand and that will continue as California's economy continues to grow.
Click to expand...

Do you understand the terms supply and demand? Do you understand that when demand constantly outruns supply, you have to build more supply, and that has to be paid for?

Sounds like a good reason to build cheap, reliable fossil fuel plants instead of more expensive, less reliable wind and solar.

California gets 54% from renewables, but is constantly short on power due to the economic dynamo that California is.

I wonder if the fact that their solar power output drops to zero at night contributes to their power shortages? I hear the nuclear plants here in Illinois can run all day.
 
Old Rocks said:
Let's see, is the satellite data computer fiction? Is the measurement of the amount of GHG's computer fiction? Was Foote and Tyndall's experiments in 1858 computer fiction? Are the satellite measured reduction of Arctic sea ice computer fiction? Is the fact that the Northwest Passage was transited by a 1000 passenger cruise ship in 2016 computer fiction? The fact that you are a liar and shill concerning science is not fiction. Afraid to say what the American Geophysical Union says about AGW? Or what the Geological Society of America says? Your continual lies reduces your credibility to zero.
Click to expand...
You mean the satellite "data" that gets run through multiple computer models before release?

That "data".

And isn't it nice that the satellite era begins 50 years ago, so they can ignore the decade of the 1930's that blows agw theory out of the water.

Interesting that....don't you think?


Ohhhh, riiiight....you don't think...you parrot.

Carry on bird brain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

It’s hot in Italy

< Previous Thread

Burmese python news.

Next Thread >

Similar threads

O
Interesting weather for the second week of February
Replies
14
Views
363
Anomalism
Anomalism
O
What will summer bring?
4 5 6
Replies
113
Views
830
EMH
EMH
O
EV buses run at -4 degrees in Wisconsin
Replies
11
Views
173
Old Rocks
O
O
Another solution for energy storage
Replies
7
Views
267
toobfreak
toobfreak
O
Installed capacity of solar exceeding coal in China
2
Replies
30
Views
592
Anomalism
Anomalism

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom