he didn't lie to the FBI. I thought you would know that by now.
www.ronpaulinstitute.org
NotfooledbyW , I'm waiting on the post number.
A declaration that in the future he will deny ever having made
yeah........ right?
Maybe, Bob is contemplating a “ change” himself and is just subtly trying to glean more info about the procedure.
Projecting yet again!
And so wasn’t Trump suggesting we should inject industrial disinfectants. Discussion doesn’t mean acceptance. You and a dictionary need to get better acquainted. You’re hilarious.
Actually, you guys are strange dudes. You have no legit argument supporting ignorance.
Yawn.Your opinion and while I respect it, I respect the opinion of a well known attorney like Jonathan Turley more.
Justified shooting or fair game? Shooter of Ashli Babbitt makes shocking admission
He proceeded to demolish the two official reviews that cleared him.thehill.com
***snip***
When protesters rushed to the House chamber, police barricaded the chamber’s doors; Capitol Police were on both sides, with officers standing directly behind Babbitt. Babbitt and others began to force their way through, and Babbitt started to climb through a broken window. That is when Byrd killed her.
At the time, some of us familiar with the rules governing police use of force raised concerns over the shooting. Those concerns were heightened by the DOJ’s bizarre review and report, which stated the governing standards but then seemed to brush them aside to clear Byrd.
The DOJ report did not read like any post-shooting review I have read as a criminal defense attorney or law professor. The DOJ statement notably does not say that the shooting was clearly justified. Instead, it stressed that “prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so ‘willfully.’” It seemed simply to shrug and say that the DOJ did not believe it could prove “a bad purpose to disregard the law” and that “evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of intent.”
While the Supreme Court, in cases such as Graham v. Connor, has said that courts must consider “the facts and circumstances of each particular case,” it has emphasized that lethal force must be used only against someone who is “an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and … is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.” Particularly with armed assailants, the standard governing “imminent harm” recognizes that these decisions must often be made in the most chaotic and brief encounters.
Under these standards, police officers should not shoot unarmed suspects or rioters without a clear threat to themselves or fellow officers. That even applies to armed suspects who fail to obey orders. Indeed, Huntsville police officer William “Ben” Darby recently was convicted for killing a suicidal man holding a gun to his own head. Despite being cleared by a police review board, Darby was prosecuted, found guilty and sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though Darby said he feared for the safety of himself and fellow officers. Yet law professors and experts who have praised such prosecutions in the past have been conspicuously silent over the shooting of an unarmed woman who had officers in front of and behind her on Jan. 6.
That statement alone portrays you as an ignoramus .
Find the quote dufus….it applies to medical community not the general public. You are an idiot.
Still waking dumbo…where is the quote liar.
You are very repetitive.
Reference from Ron Paul institute. Wow. Why don’t you just make from it from Flynn himself, a convicted felon.he didn't lie to the FBI. I thought you would know that by now.
Michael Flynn Did Not Lie, He Was Framed by The FBI
Two and one-half years ago, Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller unveiled charges against Michael Flynn for "lying to Federal agents." At the time I...
You got it On all three accounts but one alteration. For a liberal, I’m just average or below. But compared to you Humper conspiracy theorists, I am much smarter. You guys don’t even believe in AGW and every university, govt agency and major institution in the world on key issues. You guys are effin weirdos, fascist Trump Humpers
How does that change the facts?
You’re ignorant and I will always point that out
Oh, I am pretty sure he stopped her.
