Holy crap, is the LEFT now beginning to wake up?

[Dagosa]

They still have their heads buried deep up Trump's ass.

Well, it's such a big fat criminal ass. He and his fat shit laden ass are being exposed....by the testimony of....republican former supporters. Oh, that’s the deep state, republicans who are put under oath.

 

[Dagosa]

Mac-7

The Deep State is real

And out of control

the deep state....
Is primarily in your pea brain head. The rest of your “deep state” is made up of former republican Trump cohorts put under oath. You can’t take it. Melania is a member of the the deep state now. Wow. More Chem trails.

 

[Batcat]

Oh, so now you’re quoting CNN ? Ok that seems like a ligit source for you.
You are the bozos who fixated on the Steel Dorsier.

You can name one ligit criminal proceeding that use it to prosecute your fking criminal ass Trump laden crime syndicate.

No I don’t consider CNN all that legitimate but when they admit they were wrong, I consider the source and suspect CNN may be trying to change. I thought YOU would consider CNN to be reliable.

New CNN Boss Considers Axing Big Names as He Seeks to Change Network's Direction: Report

What was once reviled as the 'Clinton News Network' may be going through some changes, according to new reports.

www.westernjournal.com

The Steele Dossier was discussed buy the liberal media for years and was susposed to be God’s Truth. Plus it wa used in FISA court proceedings to get investigations on those around Trump approved.

FBI used Steele dossier in FISAs despite knowing about flaws and bias - Washington Examiner

Newly released FBI notes from interviews with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr about British ex-spy Christopher Steele show the bureau continued using Steele’s unverified and flawed dossier despite warnings about Steele’s biases. The heavily redacted documents, produced by the DOJ following...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

***snip***

The redacted FISA documents released in 2018 show the DOJ and FBI made extensive use of Steele’s dossier, which included a series of salacious and unverified allegations regarding Trump and Russia, in order to obtain surveillance through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court against former Trump campaign associate Carter Page. Steele put his research together in 2016 at the behest of Fusion GPS, which had been hired by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the Perkins Coie law firm. Steele receiving Democratic funding was never revealed to the court.

 

[JoeB131]

The Democrapic tradition of trying to cast the blame for their own fuckups on their Republican predecessors goes back a very long way.

Carter's fuckups were his own.

Biden's fuckups are his own.

Yet far more fuckups happen when Republicans are in charge. But they are right with Mormon Jesus, that's the important thing.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Your red states are a drag as you live in a world of ignorance, while dissing science, facts and generally non idiots.

Yours is the side that thinks that “science” supports the claim that Bruce Jenner is a woman.

You'll have to excuse us sane people for not taking your side very seriously when you try to lay any claim to “science”.

 

[scruffy]

Mac-7

the deep state....
Is primarily in your pea brain head.

Sigh.

You must be young.

Here's a Deep State trivia question for you:

What do Gerald Ford and Arlen Specter have in common?

 

[Dagosa]

Yours is the side that thinks that “science” supports the claim that Bruce Jenner is a woman.

That’s ridiculous . Wtf are you talking about ?
Science makes no sure claim. You’re ignorance on this topic is appalling.

 

[Dagosa]

Sigh.

You must be young.

Here's a Deep State trivia question for you:

What do Gerald Ford and Arlen Specter have in common?

What do you and Trump have in common ?

 

[Dagosa]

Yours is the side that thinks that “science” supports the claim that Bruce Jenner is a woman.

You'll have to excuse us sane people for not taking your side very seriously when you try to lay any claim to “science”.

When in doubt with no answer to a comment, you change the discussion and start with another totally off the wall lie.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So the police who were present were unable to stop one unarmed female who crawled through a window? Give me a break. She was not Wonder Woman.

Plus if you watched the video the guy who was with her says she was trying to stop protestors. If the Jan 6th Committee was actually investigating the riot, this man would be interviewed and his tape examined.

All of that embarrassing equivocation, unethical half truth, and self-degrading, aggressive ignorance...


... all to be completely wrong and once again not have reality align with anything even approaching your cult fantasies.

It has to be tiring, after a while.

 

[scruffy]

What do you and Trump have in common ?

Well, we're both white and male, beyond that not much. He has orange hair, I don't.

No clue on Gerald Ford?

 

[Dagosa]

Well, we're both white and male, beyond that not much. He has orange hair, I don't.

No clue on Gerald Ford?

Gerald Ford is not on my radar.

 

[scruffy]

Gerald Ford is not on my radar.

Okay. The Deep State goes back to at least Eisenhower, possibly Truman. (Things get a little fuzzy in the early 50's).

 

[Dagosa]

Okay. The Deep State goes back to at least Eisenhower, possibly Truman. (Things get a little fuzzy in the early 50's).

Things are a lot fuzzy as soon as you try to make up stuff. Really……the deep state is a figment of your imagination for one reason. Most of the rights ideas are based on made up shit for the gullible masses who are afraid of minorities. You guys believe shit because it’s easy. Following science, facts and ligit inquiry is hard.

 

[Dagosa]

Well, we're both white and male,

No kidding. Who’d have thought.

 

[Batcat]

All of that embarrassing equivocation, unethical half truth, and self-degrading, aggressive ignorance...


... all to be completely wrong and once again not have reality align with anything even approaching your cult fantasies.

It has to be tiring, after a while.

So the Capitol Police on the scene were incapable of stopping one unarmed female crawling though a door window.

If Ashley Babbit was black there would have been hell to pay.

Capitol Police Officer's Explanation for Shooting and Killing Ashli Babbitt Is Riddled With Problems - The Truth About Guns

&#9664Previous Post Next Post▶ When the Capitol Hill riot — or the “insurrection” as the mainstream media like to refer to it — took place on January 6th, conservatives questioned why Ashli Babbitt was shot and killed. Babbitt was a veteran who was unarmed and was shot to death by Capitol Police...

www.thetruthaboutguns.com

What if the Capitol Rioters Had Been Democrats and Ashli Babbitt a Black Woman?

pjmedia.com

 

[Dagosa]

So the Capitol Police on the scene were incapable of stopping one unarmed female crawling though a door window.

With dozens of wide eye white supremest dullards screaming “hang Mike Pence“ they were incapable of stopping the crowd behind her if she did break through. BS truth is, if that were a black man breaking into a car and not spear heading an insurrection while beating police , you’d be whining if he wasn’t shot while for stealing a TV. Hypocrisy is overwhelming.

 

[Dagosa]

So the Capitol Police on the scene were incapable of stopping one unarmed female crawling though a door window.

If Ashley Babbit was black there would have been hell to pay.

Capitol Police Officer's Explanation for Shooting and Killing Ashli Babbitt Is Riddled With Problems - The Truth About Guns

&#9664Previous Post Next Post▶ When the Capitol Hill riot — or the “insurrection” as the mainstream media like to refer to it — took place on January 6th, conservatives questioned why Ashli Babbitt was shot and killed. Babbitt was a veteran who was unarmed and was shot to death by Capitol Police...

www.thetruthaboutguns.com

What if the Capitol Rioters Had Been Democrats and Ashli Babbitt a Black Woman?

pjmedia.com

If she were black, you’d be screaming bloody murder that everyone wasn’t mowed down.

 

[Batcat]

If she were black, you’d be screaming bloody murder that everyone wasn’t mowed down.

Why would I want to see people slaughtered like in the Kent State massacre?

 

[Batcat]

With dozens of wide eye white supremest dullards screaming “hang Mike Pence“ they were incapable of stopping the crowd behind her if she did break through. BS truth is, if that were a black man breaking into a car and not spear heading an insurrection while beating police , you’d be whining if he wasn’t shot while for stealing a TV. Hypocrisy is overwhelming.

Your opinion and while I respect it, I respect the opinion of a well known attorney like Jonathan Turley more.

Justified shooting or fair game? Shooter of Ashli Babbitt makes shocking admission

He proceeded to demolish the two official reviews that cleared him.

thehill.com

***snip***


When protesters rushed to the House chamber, police barricaded the chamber’s doors; Capitol Police were on both sides, with officers standing directly behind Babbitt. Babbitt and others began to force their way through, and Babbitt started to climb through a broken window. That is when Byrd killed her.

At the time, some of us familiar with the rules governing police use of force raised concerns over the shooting. Those concerns were heightened by the DOJ’s bizarre review and report, which stated the governing standards but then seemed to brush them aside to clear Byrd.

The DOJ report did not read like any post-shooting review I have read as a criminal defense attorney or law professor. The DOJ statement notably does not say that the shooting was clearly justified. Instead, it stressed that “prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so ‘willfully.’” It seemed simply to shrug and say that the DOJ did not believe it could prove “a bad purpose to disregard the law” and that “evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of intent.”

While the Supreme Court, in cases such as Graham v. Connor, has said that courts must consider “the facts and circumstances of each particular case,” it has emphasized that lethal force must be used only against someone who is “an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and … is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.” Particularly with armed assailants, the standard governing “imminent harm” recognizes that these decisions must often be made in the most chaotic and brief encounters.

Under these standards, police officers should not shoot unarmed suspects or rioters without a clear threat to themselves or fellow officers. That even applies to armed suspects who fail to obey orders. Indeed, Huntsville police officer William “Ben” Darby recently was convicted for killing a suicidal man holding a gun to his own head. Despite being cleared by a police review board, Darby was prosecuted, found guilty and sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though Darby said he feared for the safety of himself and fellow officers. Yet law professors and experts who have praised such prosecutions in the past have been conspicuously silent over the shooting of an unarmed woman who had officers in front of and behind her on Jan. 6.