Sorry, you have not proven there was no fraud. That means you cannot prove these people are lying. On the other hand, the media and the politicians saying there was no fraud have been caught in multiple lies.
They did in the counties that won the election for incest Joe. Take a look at Milwaukee.
I thought you would say you do not have to prove anything. Do you realize that you support people that will not give other people the chance to prove anything? Why are ballots and election data being withheld if there was no fraud? Why are you scared shitless of the transparency the voter is entitled to?
Fake leftyvirus mailins. But enjoy Poopeypants while he is alive.
It doesn't work that way. You have to prove there was and you have to prove there was enough of it to change the outcome.
I sure have and you are not going to tell me a thing about what I say. Period. You are not a credible person if you support this crime.
My main talking point is that the election was stolen. That is a fact obscured by censorship, intimidation, bribery and every other illegal trick the powers that be can get away with. You will never convince me and half the country the election was not stolen. I suggest you move on and find the people you can convince. You are wasting your time with me.
Look at the swing states and the number of disputed votes that no one can see. There are enough to easily overturn the election. Why are the ballots hidden? Why does Dominion refuse to cooperate?
You have proven 0. Remember that. Your sources are dishonest and criminal.
Maybe because its been over a year and still no actual proof.
They are not fake because you say they are. Your sources are untrustworthy and have the power behind them. They say what they want whether it is fact based or not.
Now a lawsuit filed Thursday by the Amistad Project is poised to explore whether the extraordinary turnout figures can be explained merely by civic-minded residents or by a political machine that should warrant suspicion.
michaelsavage.com
Now a lawsuit filed Thursday by the Amistad Project is poised to explore whether the extraordinary turnout figures can be explained merely by civic-minded residents or by a political machine that should warrant suspicion.
Ward-by-ward voting data from this year’s election shows that numerous Milwaukee County voting precincts registered close to 100% voter turnout: Many saw 95% voter engagement, while more saw registered voters turn out at 90% or more. One ward saw 98% of voters cast a ballot.
Those numbers are not without some precedent. Turnout for many of those wards in 2016 hovered around the 85%-89% range. Many broke 90%, though nowhere near as many as did this year.
Milwaukee’s sky-high voter turnout raises questions, prompts lawsuit seeking explanation
Visit the post for more.
Now a lawsuit filed Thursday by the Amistad Project is poised to explore whether the extraordinary turnout figures can be explained merely by civic-minded residents or by a political machine that should warrant suspicion.
Ward-by-ward voting data from this year’s election shows that numerous Milwaukee County voting precincts registered close to 100% voter turnout: Many saw 95% voter engagement, while more saw registered voters turn out at 90% or more. One ward saw 98% of voters cast a ballot.
Those numbers are not without some precedent. Turnout for many of those wards in 2016 hovered around the 85%-89% range. Many broke 90%, though nowhere near as many as did this year.
Milwaukee’s sky-high voter turnout raises questions, prompts lawsuit seeking explanation
Visit the post for more.
