What is it with you people and your consistent inability to take responsibility for your own behavior?
Buy your own contraceptives and where that doesn't work, raise your kids!
If you can't DO THAT, then you have no business engaging in intercourse.
You aren't entitled to other people's property to make your life easier... and it is not someone else's responsibility to raise your children.
What you don't seem to understand is that where you are incapable of taking responsibility for yourselves, then you aren't qualified for freedom. And it is as simple as THAT.
Yep, you want to control others, and thus really don't care to reduce the number of abortions. In fact, if there were zero abortions you would still want to control the sexual life of others - but deny you're an authoritarian. You'd make a 'good' Nazi.
Question
Fundamentally what is the difference between wanting to control people by keeping gay marriage illegal and wanting to control people by forcing them to do business with people they don't like?
Try to just straight up answer if it is possible. I don't want , or need, any deflection.
Keys, I see you thanked this post, but you MUST realize that the opposite is also true. You ARE trying to control people.
Let faggots get "married" who cares
Except it isn't about homosexuals getting married it is about government tyranny. If the people of a state dont want homosexual marriage it isnt the government's place to deny that state its tenth amendment right
Tapatalk
Crazy talk, if the people of a given state want to deny two people of different races the right to engage in a contract of marriage, isn't that an example of the tyranny of the majority?
The Libertarian movement is based on a foundation of shifting sand. Let's suppose State of A allows two men to marry; State B denies this right, and makes sexual activity between two men a felony.
Point?
.
.
.
Let's assume that the 'sex between them' deviates from the human physiological standard, thus that sex indicates that both suffer from a deviant species of reasoning, thus each suffer a mental disorder. At that point, it becomes clear that neither of them are worthy of the trust which is essential to a free culture.
You see scamp, trust is based upon truth and where two people have demonstrated their inability to accept the truth which rests in the bedrock of human physiology, then neither can be trusted to recognize the truth on anything else.
For instance, such an individual may see that it's 70 Degrees at 8:00am, 75 Degrees at 10:00am and 80 Degrees by 12:00pm and conclude, through their rejection of the truth common to natural cycles that it will be 175 degrees by 12:00pm tomorrow. Thus run around demanding public policy be changed to accommodate their abnormal reasoning.
OR... Perhaps they'll see someone driving a nice car, living in a nice house, assume that those people, being 'just like them', doing exactly what they've done and they don't have as nice a car or as nice a house, thus those that DO: do not 'deserve' those nice things, at which point they go scurrying about demanding public policy which requires everyone else to give up their nice stuff so that THEY can have nice things too... .
OR... They may see that THEY Live here... and that there's no reason that people in other countries shouldn't live here too! And that despite those other countries not having the same health standards, not believing in what our country is founded upon and sustained by, that THIS is no reason to not allow them to just walk in and start soakin' up the welfare, that we gave them 'because it wasn't fair to not give THEM stuff... how is it fair to not give everyone else stuff too?'.
Ya see scamp... if we let the purveyors of perverse reasoning just walk around, sooner or later we'll end up in a position wherein, perhaps, we're at war with a political cult posing as a religion, in the wake of a catastrophic failure of some twisted political 'feeling', and elect an adherent to the political cult, posing as a religion, who advocates for the same twisted political feelings. Who establishes policies outside of our Constitutional restrictions on his power, to allow those who broke our laws to get and stay here, to stay here and to bring their would-be 'families' with them, who also abuses his power to stop people from freely assembling, who abuses his power to frame innocent people of committing federal crimes so as to establish federal policies against their industry, who sets up our Diplomatic personnel for murder and uses the power of his office to conceal his crimes... .
No, no... tolerating perverse reasoning is dangerous to the viability of our nation. It's a TERRIBLE IDEA!
See how that works?
