funny how those on the Left either don't know or care about the Clinton's actions.
I bet many of them don't know who Juanita Broaddrick is. I guess when you get all your information from left wing sources, you naturally are uninformed.
I know exactly who Broadrick is.
She's the woman who filed an affadavitt saying she never had sex with Clinton, and then came back later and claimed Clinton raped her, even though no one in her life remembers this, and she couldn't remember the date this supposedly happened.
even Ken Starr didn't consider her credible. Not that he failed to put this and every other unsubstantiated claim in his report.
Though Broaddrick was very resistant to talking to the media, rumors about her story began circulating no later than Clinton’s presidential bid in 1992.
[4] Broaddrick had confided in Phillip Yoakum, whom she knew from business circles and at the time considered a friend. When Clinton won the Democratic nomination, Yoakum, widely considered to have a
Republican agenda,
[4] contacted Sheffield Nelson, Clinton’s opponent in the 1990 gubernatorial race. Yoakum arranged a meeting between Nelson and Broaddrick, who resisted Yoakum's and Nelson’s push that she go public.
[10] Yoakum secretly taped the conversation and wrote a letter summarizing the allegations, which began to circulate within Republican circles. The story reached the
New York Times and the
LA Times in October 1992, but the papers dropped the story after Broaddrick refused to talk to reporters and Yoakum refused to release the recording.
[4]
In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.
[9] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”
[11] The investigators told her she would likely be subpoenaed if she would not talk to them. Broaddrick said she would deny everything, saying “you can’t get to him, and I’m not going to ruin my good name to do it… there’s just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he’s just too vicious.”
[11] Broaddrick was subpoenaed in the Jones suit soon after and submitted an affidavit denying that Clinton had made “any sexual advances”.
[1][2] The recording of Broaddrick’s conversation with the investigators was leaked to the press, but Broaddrick continued to refuse to speak to reporters.
[9]
Despite Broaddrick’s denial in her affidavit, Jones’ lawyers included Yoakum’s letter and Broaddrick's name in a 1998 filing.
[9] The letter suggested that the Clintons had bought Broaddrick’s silence, describing a phone call where Broaddrick’s husband asked Yoakum to say the incident never happened and said that he intended to ask Clinton “for a couple of big favors.”
[12] This, along with the discrepancy between the letter and Broaddrick’s affidavit, attracted the attention of independent counsel
Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton for obstruction of justice. After being approached by the FBI, Broaddrick consulted her son, a lawyer, who told her she could not lie to federal investigators.
[4]After they promised her she would not be prosecuted for perjury regarding her affidavit in the Jones case, Broaddrick recanted the affidavit. However, she insisted that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way, and so Starr concluded that the story was not relevant to his investigation and his report only mentioned the recanting in a footnote.
[10]
Wikipedia.
You sheeple conveniently never seem to acknowledge that part 
Just like cons, blame the fireman for trying to put out the fire.
