Hillary Clinton Is Just To Damn Old

[Redfish]

He held no office nor had any say. he is NOT relevant to the issue. HER actions HER works HER time in leadership.

Bush held office when there were other attacks on consulates and embassies and other diplomats who were also granted that same promise of protection.

The right saw fit to turn the other cheek following 9.11 and every attack on U.S. consulates and re-elect Bush.

If you want to render Bush irrelevant to this discussion, you'll need a better reason for why Bush was still qualified to run for office following the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in our history which resulted in 3000 dead, but Hillary is not qualified following an attack overseas which resulted in 4 dead...

Now you try to bring Bush in because he WAS president at the time of an attack. Argument STILL fails BECAUSE you are asking to compare a STANDING president to a "runner". Apple vs Orange.

Umm ... Bush wasn't a "runner" in 2004 following 9.11 and many of those attacks on U.S. consulates and embassies???

Is that the best defense you can muster?

To compare a standing president to another IS fair but not a standing to a runner. If you want to compare George to Bill at least that's even BUT they BOTH have zero to do with HER and HER actions.

We're comparing two people running for president and the fuckups the right ignored to elect Bush in 2004 compared to what they accuse Hillary of fucking up. I've yet to see a lucid argument for why it was perfectly ok to elect Bush as president in 2004 after failing to protect America on 9.11 which led to 3,000 deaths but not ok to elect Hillary as president for failing to protect a consulate overseas which led to 4 deaths.

bush was in office 8 months when 9/11 happened. The "prevention" should have been done by Clinton, and it wasn't. That attack was planned and resourced long before Bush took the oath of office.

 

[Sarah G]

Bush held office when there were other attacks on consulates and embassies and other diplomats who were also granted that same promise of protection.

The right saw fit to turn the other cheek following 9.11 and every attack on U.S. consulates and re-elect Bush.

If you want to render Bush irrelevant to this discussion, you'll need a better reason for why Bush was still qualified to run for office following the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in our history which resulted in 3000 dead, but Hillary is not qualified following an attack overseas which resulted in 4 dead...

Now you try to bring Bush in because he WAS president at the time of an attack. Argument STILL fails BECAUSE you are asking to compare a STANDING president to a "runner". Apple vs Orange.

Umm ... Bush wasn't a "runner" in 2004 following 9.11 and many of those attacks on U.S. consulates and embassies???

Is that the best defense you can muster?

To compare a standing president to another IS fair but not a standing to a runner. If you want to compare George to Bill at least that's even BUT they BOTH have zero to do with HER and HER actions.

We're comparing two people running for president and the fuckups the right ignored to elect Bush in 2004 compared to what they accuse Hillary of fucking up. I've yet to see a lucid argument for why it was perfectly ok to elect Bush as president in 2004 after failing to protect America on 9.11 which led to 3,000 deaths but not ok to elect Hillary as president for failing to protect a consulate overseas which led to 4 deaths.

bush was in office 8 months when 9/11 happened. The "prevention" should have been done by Clinton, and it wasn't. That attack was planned and resourced long before Bush took the oath of office.

As if anything would have been done by Bush had he been in office anyway? You're trying to blame someone here in America for 911... Pretty disgusting not to mention wrong.

Remember, Bush did nothing to bring OBL to justice. Obama did though.

 

[Redfish]

Now you try to bring Bush in because he WAS president at the time of an attack. Argument STILL fails BECAUSE you are asking to compare a STANDING president to a "runner". Apple vs Orange.

Umm ... Bush wasn't a "runner" in 2004 following 9.11 and many of those attacks on U.S. consulates and embassies???

Is that the best defense you can muster?

To compare a standing president to another IS fair but not a standing to a runner. If you want to compare George to Bill at least that's even BUT they BOTH have zero to do with HER and HER actions.

We're comparing two people running for president and the fuckups the right ignored to elect Bush in 2004 compared to what they accuse Hillary of fucking up. I've yet to see a lucid argument for why it was perfectly ok to elect Bush as president in 2004 after failing to protect America on 9.11 which led to 3,000 deaths but not ok to elect Hillary as president for failing to protect a consulate overseas which led to 4 deaths.

bush was in office 8 months when 9/11 happened. The "prevention" should have been done by Clinton, and it wasn't. That attack was planned and resourced long before Bush took the oath of office.

As if anything would have been done by Bush had he been in office anyway? You're trying to blame someone here in America for 911... Pretty disgusting not to mention wrong.

Remember, Bush did nothing to bring OBL to justice. Obama did though.

wrong of all counts. The environment that made 9/11 possible was created by the Clinton administration when it prevented our intelligence agencies from exchanging data and taking agressive action against terrorists.

OBL was shot because of intel developed by the Bush administration. All obama did was give the OK to take him out-------------and he gave it very reluctantly.

 

[Sarah G]

Umm ... Bush wasn't a "runner" in 2004 following 9.11 and many of those attacks on U.S. consulates and embassies???

Is that the best defense you can muster?

To compare a standing president to another IS fair but not a standing to a runner. If you want to compare George to Bill at least that's even BUT they BOTH have zero to do with HER and HER actions.

We're comparing two people running for president and the fuckups the right ignored to elect Bush in 2004 compared to what they accuse Hillary of fucking up. I've yet to see a lucid argument for why it was perfectly ok to elect Bush as president in 2004 after failing to protect America on 9.11 which led to 3,000 deaths but not ok to elect Hillary as president for failing to protect a consulate overseas which led to 4 deaths.

bush was in office 8 months when 9/11 happened. The "prevention" should have been done by Clinton, and it wasn't. That attack was planned and resourced long before Bush took the oath of office.

As if anything would have been done by Bush had he been in office anyway? You're trying to blame someone here in America for 911... Pretty disgusting not to mention wrong.

Remember, Bush did nothing to bring OBL to justice. Obama did though.

wrong of all counts. The environment that made 9/11 possible was created by the Clinton administration when it prevented our intelligence agencies from exchanging data and taking agressive action against terrorists.

OBL was shot because of intel developed by the Bush administration. All obama did was give the OK to take him out-------------and he gave it very reluctantly.

Wrong yet again. You must hold the world record or something.

 

[Skull Pilot]

The problem with Hillary isn't her age it's that she's a clinton

 

[Redfish]

To compare a standing president to another IS fair but not a standing to a runner. If you want to compare George to Bill at least that's even BUT they BOTH have zero to do with HER and HER actions.

We're comparing two people running for president and the fuckups the right ignored to elect Bush in 2004 compared to what they accuse Hillary of fucking up. I've yet to see a lucid argument for why it was perfectly ok to elect Bush as president in 2004 after failing to protect America on 9.11 which led to 3,000 deaths but not ok to elect Hillary as president for failing to protect a consulate overseas which led to 4 deaths.

bush was in office 8 months when 9/11 happened. The "prevention" should have been done by Clinton, and it wasn't. That attack was planned and resourced long before Bush took the oath of office.

As if anything would have been done by Bush had he been in office anyway? You're trying to blame someone here in America for 911... Pretty disgusting not to mention wrong.

Remember, Bush did nothing to bring OBL to justice. Obama did though.

wrong of all counts. The environment that made 9/11 possible was created by the Clinton administration when it prevented our intelligence agencies from exchanging data and taking agressive action against terrorists.

OBL was shot because of intel developed by the Bush administration. All obama did was give the OK to take him out-------------and he gave it very reluctantly.

Wrong yet again. You must hold the world record or something.

what I posted is 100% correct. if you choose to believe dem myths, go right ahead, you fit in well with the idiot class.

 

[Redfish]

The problem with Hillary isn't her age it's that she's a clinton

actually its both, plus being a liar, a fraud, and a screeching bitch.

 

[Skull Pilot]

The problem with Hillary isn't her age it's that she's a clinton

actually its both, plus being a liar, a fraud, and a screeching bitch.

Like I said she's a clinton.

 

[Wildman]

we had a dozen Benghazi's while Bush was president

i demand proof with specifics.., providing you know what the word "specifics" mean.
i believe as usual, you and every fucking liberscum lie your asses off just to get responses like mine, then you run off to your home at nearest bridge to hide under.

........+..............

 

[Wildman]

The "prevention" should have been done by Clinton, and it wasn't.

in fact Cliton approved the visas for those muslimes who piloted the September 11 terrorist attack flight training right here in the good ole U.S.A.

in my OPINION, that was an act of treason !!

 

[jon_berzerk]

either handicapped or cheating the handicapped out of a parking spot

good work hillary

--LOL

 

[ScienceRocks]

Reagan was 1 year older!

 

[Agit8r]

Same age as Reagan was, so could be....