With the debt the left is forcing on us something has to give. We are either going to HAVE TO raise taxes or cut spending. The answer seems obvious to me but few seem courageous enough to try.
1. Cut foreign aid by 80% or more.
2. Stop funding shrimp on a treadmill type shit.
3. Increase oil production and export it.
4. Put salary caps on politicians.
5. Ban fundraising/money in politics. Require PBS to host and air ALL political debates since we fund them (cut out corporate media money pits)
6. Make ALL government contracts publicly bid. No more giving contracts to your buddies who charge you 80 bucks for a toilet seat.
7. Create a section on irs forms for contributions to go DIRECTLY to our national debt and make that program publicly accessible by anyone via the internet (full transparency)
8. Lock down our southern border and institute strick guidelines for work visas.
9. Cut the budget of ALL federal agencies by at least 5%.
10. Add a balanced budget amendment to the constitution.
11. Require ALL spending bills to be accessible for 7 days & to be publicly read on the floor BEFORE any vote is taken.
12. AFTER all that raise taxes incrementally as needed.
These are just thoughts off the top of my head. Point being that anyone, including our elected officials, can solve this problem if they actually wanted to.
Why either/or? Why not both?
1. I think a across the board cut by that amount would undermine our national interests. "Foreign Aid" is a catchall that covers many different types of aid, including those that help advance our own interests abroad or increase stability. It's easy to say cut foreign aid, I think most people don't really realize what it entails or they think the US can live in a vacuum, isolated from what goes on abroad. When that happens, another power will step in, like China.
2. What bill was that in? Another reality check here...stuff like that, is easy to pick out and hold up for public outrage, like many different ridiculous our outrageous funding requests. But spending bills for science (and correct me if I'm wrong) are usually given out like "block grants" and the determinations on what projects are funded are determined by a competitive process overseen by scientific panels. Do you really want the federal government to determine what specific projects should or should not be funded? I don't.
3. Why export it? We'll just use it up quicker. Why do we need to increase production at this point?
4. Sure...but tie it to cost of living. Living in DC is very expensive.
5. Sure. PBS already airs political debates on both sides. No need to require it. PBS is just the convenient rightwing punching bag. You can thank Citizens United for the rest. We really need to reduce money in politics. Elected officials spend more time accumulating "war chests" now than doing their job imo.
6&7. Sounds good.
8. We need comprehensive bipartisan immigration reform, not just "lock down the border".
9. Why? Aren't they already operating on budget cuts...for some time now??
10. No. Finance at that level doesn't operate like a checkbook. I think that would cause more problems than it would fix;
11. Raise taxes as appropriate from the start.
I would add that for one, it is utterly ironic that the right is suddenly concerned again about debt. And also, decreased spending should not occur while the economy is still trying to recover and joblessness still high. The time to cut spending, imo, is when it's booming and people and businesses don't need help.