MarathonMike
Diamond Member
How many hundreds of millions did we piss away on California's high speed train to nowhere? Now it's billions? FFS we are living Idiocracy 2023.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My time is not speculation, at all.First off, your times are speculation. Nonetheless, I never said it would necessarily be faster, but it does alleviate the stress of having to drive in that mess and on key days, like Sundays, for instance, it would definitely be faster. You can make the same argument about flying. Between the commuting time to and from the airports, assuming you arrive two hours early as suggested, and about an hour and 20 minutes from gate to gate, it's really no faster than driving, which is the reason I usually just drive rather than fly out there.
Also, I'm still waiting for you to explain your earlier comments of how having this rail service will create more traffic between LA and RC if, as you continue to claim, no one will use it anyway.
A deeper question might be How could a country that's 35 trillion dollars in debt not have high speed rail?How many hundreds of millions did we piss away on California's high speed train to nowhere? Now it's billions? FFS we are living Idiocracy 2023.
The Biden administration announced Friday the largest federal investment in passenger trains in decades, with $8.2 billion in new funding for high-speed rail and other projects nationwide.
Why it matters: Rail travel is considered a relatively clean way to get lots of people from A to B, especially compared to aviation — but the U.S. rail network is sorely lagging behind that of peer nations in Europe and Asia.
Driving the news: The big highlight were two multibillion-dollar packages for planned high-speed rail projects.
The other package would provide for high-speed rail travel between Bakersfield and Merced, Calif.
- One would connect Las Vegas, Nev. and Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. (just east of Los Angeles) using electrified trains.
- It's expected to carry more than 11 million passengers annually, the White House said, with roughly two-hour trips — half the typical drive time.
- It's being built by Brightline, a private train operator that's been expanding across Florida and is now setting its eyes westward.
Meanwhile: The investment will also support improved train infrastructure in North Carolina, the Washington, D.C. area, Chicago, Pennsylvania and more.
- "New all-electric trainsets will produce zero emissions and be powered by 100% renewable energy," per the White House.
Yes, and: Amtrak and Texas Central (another private high-speed rail company) are exploring a partnership around Houston-Dallas service.
- New Amtrak service connecting Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati is also on the table, as is a line connecting Scranton and New York City.
How is the democrat party the party of science when the simplest of things, that are proven, they argue with?
Which has far higher concentrations of their population. They are unfeasible for the United States save for the Acela line in the NE. That corridor has a population of about 44 million, making it feasible for high-speed rail..Japan has had HSR since 1968.
aint that the truth, a man is whatever he likes, a man or women,This is, after all, the very same “party of ‘science’” that has a plank in its official platform that denies the biological distinction between men and women.
CA has spent way more than that since the Obama days and still doesn't have a train, brah.The Biden administration announced Friday the largest federal investment in passenger trains in decades, with $8.2 billion in new funding for high-speed rail and other projects nationwide.
Why it matters: Rail travel is considered a relatively clean way to get lots of people from A to B, especially compared to aviation — but the U.S. rail network is sorely lagging behind that of peer nations in Europe and Asia.
Driving the news: The big highlight were two multibillion-dollar packages for planned high-speed rail projects.
The other package would provide for high-speed rail travel between Bakersfield and Merced, Calif.
- One would connect Las Vegas, Nev. and Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. (just east of Los Angeles) using electrified trains.
- It's expected to carry more than 11 million passengers annually, the White House said, with roughly two-hour trips — half the typical drive time.
- It's being built by Brightline, a private train operator that's been expanding across Florida and is now setting its eyes westward.
Meanwhile: The investment will also support improved train infrastructure in North Carolina, the Washington, D.C. area, Chicago, Pennsylvania and more.
- "New all-electric trainsets will produce zero emissions and be powered by 100% renewable energy," per the White House.
Yes, and: Amtrak and Texas Central (another private high-speed rail company) are exploring a partnership around Houston-Dallas service.
- New Amtrak service connecting Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati is also on the table, as is a line connecting Scranton and New York City.
$8.2 billion.CA has spent way more than that since the Obama days and still doesn't have a train, brah.
MSN
www.msn.com
What if that much money was split between all Americans?$8.2 billion.
The cost of 1 day in the Iraq/ Afghanistan wars of the last 22 years.
How many billions of dollars of equipment did Biden unnecessarily leave in Afghanistan?$8.2 billion.
The cost of 1 day in the Iraq/ Afghanistan wars of the last 22 years.
Little comfort to the 95+% of the country who will benefit not at all from those projects but will be required to pay for it. How much will these trains need to be government subsidized in perpetuity?The Biden administration announced Friday the largest federal investment in passenger trains in decades, with $8.2 billion in new funding for high-speed rail and other projects nationwide.
Why it matters: Rail travel is considered a relatively clean way to get lots of people from A to B, especially compared to aviation — but the U.S. rail network is sorely lagging behind that of peer nations in Europe and Asia.
Driving the news: The big highlight were two multibillion-dollar packages for planned high-speed rail projects.
The other package would provide for high-speed rail travel between Bakersfield and Merced, Calif.
- One would connect Las Vegas, Nev. and Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. (just east of Los Angeles) using electrified trains.
- It's expected to carry more than 11 million passengers annually, the White House said, with roughly two-hour trips — half the typical drive time.
- It's being built by Brightline, a private train operator that's been expanding across Florida and is now setting its eyes westward.
Meanwhile: The investment will also support improved train infrastructure in North Carolina, the Washington, D.C. area, Chicago, Pennsylvania and more.
- "New all-electric trainsets will produce zero emissions and be powered by 100% renewable energy," per the White House.
Yes, and: Amtrak and Texas Central (another private high-speed rail company) are exploring a partnership around Houston-Dallas service.
- New Amtrak service connecting Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati is also on the table, as is a line connecting Scranton and New York City.
Why you asking me about that traitor ?How many billions of dollars of equipment did Biden unnecessarily leave in Afghanistan?