Here it is once again from the clowncar.

[boilermaker55]

Kansas lawmaker bans revealing attire for female witnesses

TOPEKA, Kan. -- A Kansas Senate committee chairman has imposed a dress code that prohibits women testifying on an elections or ethics bill from wearing certain clothing while establishing no wardrobe restrictions exclusively for men.
The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that a rule of state Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct says "low-cut necklines and miniskirts" are inappropriate for women.
Holmes says he offered detailed guidance to women because he had observed provocatively clad women at the state Capitol. He says it's a distraction to the Senate committee during testimony.
What a bunch of buffoons.
At least one republican has some sense.
Republican Sen. Carolyn McGinn: "I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they're wearing that day."

 

[Auld Phart]

Kansas lawmaker bans revealing attire for female witnesses

TOPEKA, Kan. -- A Kansas Senate committee chairman has imposed a dress code that prohibits women testifying on an elections or ethics bill from wearing certain clothing while establishing no wardrobe restrictions exclusively for men.
The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that a rule of state Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct says "low-cut necklines and miniskirts" are inappropriate for women.
Holmes says he offered detailed guidance to women because he had observed provocatively clad women at the state Capitol. He says it's a distraction to the Senate committee during testimony.
What a bunch of buffoons.
At least one republican has some sense.
Republican Sen. Carolyn McGinn: "I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they're wearing that day."

Republican Sen. Carolyn McGinn: "I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they're wearing that day."

a woman isn't interested?

how about the men?

is the attire a distraction to them?

 

[Cassandro]

Kansas lawmaker bans revealing attire for female witnesses

TOPEKA, Kan. -- A Kansas Senate committee chairman has imposed a dress code that prohibits women testifying on an elections or ethics bill from wearing certain clothing while establishing no wardrobe restrictions exclusively for men.
The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that a rule of state Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct says "low-cut necklines and miniskirts" are inappropriate for women.
Holmes says he offered detailed guidance to women because he had observed provocatively clad women at the state Capitol. He says it's a distraction to the Senate committee during testimony.
What a bunch of buffoons.
At least one republican has some sense.
Republican Sen. Carolyn McGinn: "I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they're wearing that day."

So you are in favor of the status quo, which maintains a tacit dress code for men but absolutely nothing for women. Why is it OK for a woman to dress like a hooker, but not OK for a man to dress like a bum?

 

[boilermaker55]

Why did you make that comment? Please explain.

Kansas lawmaker bans revealing attire for female witnesses

TOPEKA, Kan. -- A Kansas Senate committee chairman has imposed a dress code that prohibits women testifying on an elections or ethics bill from wearing certain clothing while establishing no wardrobe restrictions exclusively for men.
The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that a rule of state Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct says "low-cut necklines and miniskirts" are inappropriate for women.
Holmes says he offered detailed guidance to women because he had observed provocatively clad women at the state Capitol. He says it's a distraction to the Senate committee during testimony.
What a bunch of buffoons.
At least one republican has some sense.
Republican Sen. Carolyn McGinn: "I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they're wearing that day."

Republican Sen. Carolyn McGinn: "I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they're wearing that day."

a woman isn't interested?

how about the men?

is the attire a distraction to them?

 

[boilermaker55]

Explain what dressing like a hooker means?
Try!

Kansas lawmaker bans revealing attire for female witnesses

TOPEKA, Kan. -- A Kansas Senate committee chairman has imposed a dress code that prohibits women testifying on an elections or ethics bill from wearing certain clothing while establishing no wardrobe restrictions exclusively for men.
The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that a rule of state Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct says "low-cut necklines and miniskirts" are inappropriate for women.
Holmes says he offered detailed guidance to women because he had observed provocatively clad women at the state Capitol. He says it's a distraction to the Senate committee during testimony.
What a bunch of buffoons.
At least one republican has some sense.
Republican Sen. Carolyn McGinn: "I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they're wearing that day."

So you are in favor of the status quo, which maintains a tacit dress code for men but absolutely nothing for women. Why is it OK for a woman to dress like a hooker, but not OK for a man to dress like a bum?

 

[NightFox]

The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that a rule of state Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct says "low-cut necklines and miniskirts" are inappropriate for women.

WTF? Obviously Senator Holmes is a pillow biter ......

 

[boilermaker55]

He is one of the misogynistic assholes that believes women need to dress according to what his mind thinks.

The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that a rule of state Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct says "low-cut necklines and miniskirts" are inappropriate for women.

WTF? Obviously Senator Holmes is a pillow biter ......

 

[OldLady]

"Dress codes" crack me up. Take a look at the 6 p.m. Fox news. The women are in sleeveless sheath dresses that end several inches above the knee, and four or five inch stilleto heels. The men don't have to wear clothing that clings to every curve and bulge and bares as much of their body as is socially acceptable. Tonight picture the guys sitting there in all their glory in Speedo shorts and muscle shirts. The sexual objectification of women is so ingrained no one even notices.
Senator Holmes is a dinosaur, and thanks for noticing, guys.

 

[NightFox]

The sexual objectification of women is so ingrained no one even notices.
.

Nothing wrong with a beautiful woman dressing in a way that shows off her beauty, as long she's comfortable with it. Anybody that doesn't like it can complain to the manufacturer.

 

[TNHarley]

what happened to "equality" and all that?

 

[Freewill]

Kansas lawmaker bans revealing attire for female witnesses

TOPEKA, Kan. -- A Kansas Senate committee chairman has imposed a dress code that prohibits women testifying on an elections or ethics bill from wearing certain clothing while establishing no wardrobe restrictions exclusively for men.
The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that a rule of state Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct says "low-cut necklines and miniskirts" are inappropriate for women.
Holmes says he offered detailed guidance to women because he had observed provocatively clad women at the state Capitol. He says it's a distraction to the Senate committee during testimony.
What a bunch of buffoons.
At least one republican has some sense.
Republican Sen. Carolyn McGinn: "I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they're wearing that day."

So you are in favor of the status quo, which maintains a tacit dress code for men but absolutely nothing for women. Why is it OK for a woman to dress like a hooker, but not OK for a man to dress like a bum?

Not sure if i have a real problem with that.

 

[Freewill]

what happened to "equality" and all that?

Men are not allowed to wear plunging necklines or mini skirts........Oh wait would that bigoted against trannies.

 

[boilermaker55]

What equality issue are you talking about?

what happened to "equality" and all that?

 

[TNHarley]

What equality issue are you talking about?

what happened to "equality" and all that?

women having a standard of attire. I am sure the mean cant show up in cut-offs and wife beaters

 

[boilermaker55]

They why wasn't that addressed by mr. misogynistic?

What equality issue are you talking about?

what happened to "equality" and all that?

women having a standard of attire. I am sure the mean cant show up in cut-offs and wife beaters